HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

The Marksman Who Refused to Shoot George Washington

By Ernest B. Furgurson | American History| Drafts  | 9 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

If Ferguson had taken aim and fired at the officer who turned his back and rode away, there is no telling how the American Revolution would have turned out.

On September 11, 1777, an army of 12,500 British troops who had recently landed at the northern end of the Chesapeake Bay marched through Pennsylvania toward the patriot capital of Philadelphia. Covering their flank, a detachment of green-clad British marksmen hid in the woods along Brandywine Creek, near Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, and kept a lookout for American forces led by General George Washington. Suddenly a cavalry officer dressed in the flamboyant uniform of a European hussar rode into view, followed by a senior American officer wearing a high cocked hat.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to American History magazine

Captain Patrick Ferguson, a 33-year-old Scotsman reputed to be the finest shot in the British army, commanded the British marksmen, who were equipped with fast-firing, breech-loading rifles of Ferguson’s own design. He whispered to three of his best riflemen to creep forward and pick off the unsuspecting officers. But before the men were in place, he felt disgust at the idea of such an ambush, and ordered them not to fire. He shouted to the American officer, who was riding a bay horse. The American looked his way for a moment, and turned to ride on. Ferguson called again, this time leveling his rifle toward the officer. The American glanced back before slowly cantering away.

A day later, after he had been seriously wounded himself, Ferguson learned that the American officer he let ride off was most likely General George Washington. “I could have lodged half a dozen balls in or about him, before he was out of my reach,” Ferguson recalled, “but it was not pleasant to fire at the back of an unoffending individual, who was acquitting himself very coolly of his duty—so I let him alone.”

If Ferguson had taken aim and fired at the officer who turned his back and rode away, there is no telling how the American Revolution would have turned out. Washington lost the Battle of Brandywine and then the city of Philadelphia, but lived on to win the war. A century later the American historian Lyman C. Draper wrote: “How slight, oftentimes, are the incidents which…seem to give direction to the most momentous concerns of the human race. This singular impulse of Ferguson illustrates, in a forcible manner, the over-ruling hand of Providence in directing the operation of a man’s mind when he himself is least of all aware of it.”

Generations have honored the name of Washington, but few remember the chivalrous officer who held his fire and let the general ride on into history. The Scotsman deserved fame for what he did in the rest of his short but full life; he was a brave but unconventional professional soldier, eager for battle from adolescence to the day he died. As Draper would write, “No man, perhaps, of his rank and years, ever attained more military distinction in his day than Patrick Ferguson.” Many months after Brandywine, when the Revolutionary War turned south, it also turned to partisan combat, especially in the thinly settled country back of the Atlantic coast. There Ferguson rode into a darker chapter of history in a battlefield finale that was anything but glorious.

Ferguson was a son of the Scottish Enlightenment, born in 1744 to an eminent judge near Aberdeen, who bought a commission for him before his 15th birthday as a cornet (junior lieutenant) in the Royal North British Dragoons. He proved himself under fire in Flanders and Germany during the Seven Years’ War, but sustained injuries that derailed his military career for nearly six years. Although one leg was still lame, in 1768 he returned to service as a captain in the 70th Foot, a regiment assigned to put down slave uprisings in the West Indies. That meant disorganized, small-unit warfare, experience that Ferguson would draw on near the end of his life. After the tropical islands, he was sent in the early 1770s to the garrison of Halifax, Nova Scotia, quiet duty that soon bored him, and he returned to Britain as disputes heightened between the American colonies and the mother country.

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Tags: , ,

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 9 Comments to “The Marksman Who Refused to Shoot George Washington”

  2. What a pity,that honor isn’t contagious.

    By E.T. on Feb 20, 2009 at 8:29 pm

  3. It was a Gentleman’s war, for sure. For, let’s be honest, we were all British, and I would feel uncomfortable at that time, being of Scottish blood myself, shooting someone from the colonies. And Patrick Ferguson from Scotland, whose father or uncles likely served in the Jacobite Rebellion, did his duty but had no love of King George and the Hanoverians for what they did to Kingdom of Scotland.

    By Keith Patrick Larsen on Feb 21, 2009 at 6:23 am

  4. “Captain Patrick Ferguson, a 33-year-old Scotsman reputed to be the finest shot in the British army, commanded the British marksmen, who were equipped with fast-firing, breech-loading rifles of Ferguson’s own design” Hmmm, I thought that rifles were invented somewhere around the late 1800s. Anything before that was smoothbore.

    By Paul on Mar 25, 2009 at 2:52 pm

  5. did anyone else here read the entire article?

    By Andrew on Mar 26, 2009 at 8:31 pm

  6. The rifle, invented in the 15th cent., is a firearm with a grooved, or rifled, bore that imparts a spinning motion to the bullet, giving it greater accuracy. (The principle of rifling the inner surface of the barrel is applied also to artillery.) Rifles first came into widespread practical use in the E United States. Because of its slow rate of fire and its manufacturing cost, the rifle remained relatively unused as a military weapon in Europe. Until the middle of the 19th cent. the musket was the standard small arm.

    http://www.ask.com/bar?q=when+was+the+rifle+invented&page=1&qsrc=2417&ab=4&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.factmonster.com%2Fce6%2Fhistory%2FA0861137.html

    By p on Mar 27, 2009 at 12:17 am

  7. yeah right. SOURCE PLEASE. This is what citations are for, so you can’t just tell a story and have everyone believe you without providing any proof.

    George Washington, Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams all grew hemp. Today they would be arrested and thrown in prison for that.

    source: tinyurl.com/1mn

    By Phil E. Drifter on Apr 1, 2009 at 8:00 am

  8. Hemp! That is just one of our freedoms (rights) that have been taken from (we the people) us. As you said, they all grew it and all were great leaders, worked for thier money, not steal from the
    people and make a living being a politician. Everyone needs to really study our Constitution and quit listening ( and believing) to how our so called leaders are interpreting it.
    Remember, God gave us our rights, the Constitution was written to insure our God given rights were protected in this country !!!
    I can go on.

    God Bless us all

    By Greg on Apr 14, 2009 at 2:51 pm

  9. Those great leaders you quote Phil/Greg also kept slaves, sodmoized children and had incestuous/extra-marital relationships… lovely what a bit of back ground reading on these “leaders of men” shows up heh!

    And I think I can live without the drug abuse to live in a land without slavery thank you so very much.

    Oh and as neither of you bothered to give sources I’ll withold mine too, happy hunting.

    Greg… there is no god and even if there was she’s a black big mama living down in Mexico pointing her finger at you and laughing -”God gave us our rights, the Constitution was written to insure our God given rights were protected in this country” – yeah, right!

    By Milander on Apr 28, 2009 at 3:33 am

  10. People love to tear down the founders these days and it seems like they think that their generation is so above reproach. Your exaggeration of the founders sins is more propaganda than fact. I would bet that you have some skeletons in your closet also.

    By Jim on Jun 5, 2009 at 12:22 pm

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

OPINION POLL

Which of these World War I aircraft was the best fighter plane?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Get Our Daily HistoryNet Email
 
 


What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us|Advertise With Us|Subscription Help