|
|
The Importance of Being MussoliniBy Robert M. Citino | Front & Center | 2 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post Sure, for many, he remains the comic relief of a very unfunny war. He had spouted off about war for almost two decades when the real thing broke out in 1939–and then he suddenly got cold feet and stayed out of it. When “neutrality” seemed to be an insufficiently fascist term, he invented a new one: “non-belligerency.” Only when France was well and truly beaten, and he began to get nervous about being left out of the peace talks in a Hitler-dominated Europe, did he bring Italy into the war. The parade of disasters that followed still boggles the mind: Savoy, Sidi Barrani, Taranto, Greece, Beda Fomm. For many folks who study World War II, ineptitude will always be spelled “D-U-C-E.” Subscribe Today
Mussolini was, as my late father put it, a buffone. And yet, the more I think about it, the more I see that the Duce played a central role in the war. Here is a partial list of things that would not have happened if Mussolini had not brought Italy into the war. The Balkan campaign, and thus the German airdrop on Crete. The entire seesaw war in North Africa, from Agheila in 1941 to Alamein in 1942, and thus the fame of Field Marshal Erwin Rommel. Put the “Desert Fox” in the Soviet Union and chances are he’s just another general. The entire Mediterranean campaign, from Torch to Husky to Avalanche to the Po. No Anzio. No Cassino. In other words, it’s a VERY different war without Italy. Indeed, a Germany completely isolated and without allies in 1939 might not have even started the war in the first place. Historians usually call him a drain on German resources. My first response: Aw, gee… you’re breaking my heart. No one forced Hitler to sign the Pact of Steel. My second one: Mussolini may have unwittingly been an aid to the Germans. By opening up those new fronts in 1940, disasters and all, he gave the Wehrmacht maneuver space to do what it did best: win operational-level victories over the British. Indeed, it almost had strategic consequences in the summer of 1942, when Rommel’s armored spearheads were knocking on the door of Suez. He deserves more attention than he usually gets. For more military history blogs, visit our partner site, GreatHistory.com. Help HistoryNet by bookmarking to
            Tags: 20th - 21st Century, Military History, Sea-Air Operations, World War II
 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
Loading ...
2 Comments to “The Importance of Being Mussolini”
as you said Mussolini unnecessarily brought Italy in to 2nd w.w. He could have avoided war like spanish General who took neutrality in the war. spanish Franco did constructive job for his country by wisely avoided war.
By munirrrrrrathnam Jayaprakash on Oct 5, 2009 at 4:47 am
Mussolini’s biggest contribution was his influence in brokering “Peace in Our Time” in 1938 during the Czech crisis. Had he stayed neutral two momentous events would have been altered: (1) Operation Barbarossa commences 4-6 weeks earlier than it did and (2) the western allies would have no choice but to attack France without the combat experience and training they received in the Mediterranean
By paul penrod on Oct 6, 2009 at 10:09 am