Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link Weider History Group RSS feed Weider Subscriptions Historynet Home page

Spies??

By Robert M. Citino 
Originally published under Front & Center Blog. Published Online: July 20, 2010 
Print Friendly
5 comments FONT +  FONT -

Last time out we talked about spies.  Cloak'n'dagger.  Derring-do.  There is no doubt that the Allies got the better of the espionage battle in World War II, as the stories of Juan Pujol Garcia (code-named "Garbo"), Dusko Popov ("Tricycle") and Richard Sorge ("Ramsay") all demonstrate.

You want to talk about "information dominance" over your adversary?  Consider this:  in World War II, the Allies actually cracked the German encoding mechanism, the so-called "Enigma machine."  They extracted so much information from it (in an operation code-named "Ultra") that they quite literally had to spend the rest of the war deliberately under-reacting to the intelligence they had gathered, lest the Germans realize they'd been had and move to some new, more secure system.  Even with that self-imposed limitation, the Allies were reading Hitler's mail for the entire war.  The same thing went for the Pacific, where we had cracked the Japanese "Purple" diplomatic code before the war began (in the operation code-named "Magic").  It was as complete an intelligence advantage as anyone had ever enjoyed in military history.

Having said that, I would still recommend a healthy dose of skepticism regarding many of those secret missions.  Let's look a bit more closely at the U.S. espionage network in North Africa, a group of vice consuls whom FDR liked to call his "12 Apostles."  Technically serving as "food control officers" monitoring the trade agreement between Vichy France and the U.S., they had been as busy as bees In the run-up to Operation Torch:  handing out bags of cash, stealing Italian, French, and Spanish diplomatic codes, and organizing anti-Vichy insurrections in all three Allied landing zones (Algiers, Oran, and Rabat).  All three began  simultaneously with the Allied landings, and all three failed miserably.  It was, as Rick Atkinson puts it in An Army at Dawn, a classic opéra bouffe, replete with struggles for precedence between the Vichy officers, uncertainty amongst their American patrons, and a higher-than-normal level of SNAFU and dissonance. There would come a time in the postwar era when U.S. agents would become expert at sponsoring coups across the globe, but that time was not yet.  As things collapsed around him, the American spymaster in Algiers, diplomat Robert Murphy, actually wondered if he'd gotten the date wrong!  He spent that first night in prison, as did his colleague Kenneth Pendar.  Murphy would note in his memoirs that their Senegalese guard offered the two men a Gitane cigarette–the customary last smoke offered to a condemned man.

Well, it didn't come to that, thankfully.  The mess was eventually sorted out, and Allied troops soon arrived in Algiers.  The point is that such operations, while they make a stirring spy novel, are much more difficult to carry out smoothly in real life, and are as likely to backfire as they are to succeed.  Indeed, the sum total of our espionage war in North Africa was a mixed-blessing deal with Admiral Darlan, a highly unpopular figure within North Africa whose Vichy (read "Axis) connections also made him anathema to large parts of the U.S. public.  "Are we fighting Nazis or sleeping with them?" asked CBS radio commentator Edward R. Murrow at the time, and it was a good question.

I sometimes wonder if we all watch too many films like Ocean's 11, in which a small hardy band of roguish good guys carry out an impossibly complex heist with pin-point precision and everyone is happy in the end.  If only real life were more like the movies.

For more discussion of the war, the latest news, and announcements, be sure to visit World War II Magazine's Facebook page. 
 


447, Fire for Effect|, Fire for Effect

5 Responses to “Spies??”


  1. 1
    Matt says:

    Interesting piece.

    Also, your last point is why one should watch the original Ocean's 11 with Frank Sinatra, where everthing does not go right and the gangs nefarious profits literally go up in smoke.

  2. 2
    Rob Citino says:

    Matt–

    Excellent point! Frank and the boys had enough cynicism about everything (including crime) to make a movie where the heist fails.

    Best line:
    "Tell me, Doc. Is it the big casino?"

    Interesting opint: Frank's crew had all been veterans of the war. Maybe they learned about SNAFU there.

    –Rob C

  3. 3

    Matt–

    You led me to add a little appendix to my post. Thanks for the inspiration!

    –Rob

  4. 4
    Matt says:

    It was no problem.

    I was just reading your post and thought, but what about the original movie.

    I look forward to reading your blog (and your more scholarly works) in the future.

    Cheers

    Matt

  5. 5
    LTC Frank X. Weiss USA, (R) says:

    Rob

    Do you think that declassified American Clandestine Operations ought to be analyzed by military historians, spy masters, clandestine practitioners and theorists to distill the bare minimum essentials for proper human and electronic intelligence collection, bribery, technology theft, regime destabilization, strategic/tactical sabotage? In an age of weapons of mass destruction and supersonic aircraft, can we afford to be the goofy footed and unsubtle apes we were in 1942? In my lifetime we crippled our intelligence collection capability by eliminating spy networks and HUMINT, only to have it kick us in the butt on 9/11. When do we "Get SMART"?



Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Related Articles


History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer
HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
STAY CONNECTED WITH US
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by Weider History, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
Weider History

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer! | StreamHistory.com
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2014 Weider History. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy