As the dust settled over Europe in the summer of 1945 and war-ravaged Europeans began the slow process of recovery, the leadership of the Wehrmacht attempted to present itself as untainted by the crimes committed by the Reich. Field Marshal Erich von Manstein artistically painted a picture in his memoirs of the gulf that'separated soldiers' standards and those of our political leadership.' He was not alone. Many other generals busied themselves glossing over the abundant explicit examples of their own complicity with the Nazi regime. Meanwhile, those in the dock at Nuremberg sought to deflect their own guilt by laying the blame at the feet of Adolf Hitler and his SS minions. This campaign of selective memory picked up steam as relations between the former Allies deteriorated and experienced officers of the Wehrmacht were seen as possible assets in any future war between the West and the Soviet Union. By 1946 the impression that the Wehrmacht had fought a chivalrous war, despite the pressure from above to be brutal, was becoming accepted as gospel by some in the West. Even with the passage of 60 years, this impression remains largely unchallenged. While it is true that the Wehrmacht generally fought within the recognized rules of war in Western Europe, the conflict on the Eastern Front was entirely different. In the vast expanse of the Soviet Union, the Wehrmacht was responsible for some of the worst excesses of the war. Subscribe Today
Hitler's war against the Soviet Union fused ideological aggression with racial impetus and colonial aspirations that resulted in a conflict of unsurpassed brutality. Rather than being an unwilling participant in this brutal struggle, the Wehrmacht was a loyal and enthusiastic player. One of the most telling examples of its participation in war crimes was its treatment of Soviet prisoners of war. Statistics show that out of 5.7 million Soviet soldiers captured between 1941 and 1945, more than 3.5 million died in captivity. Several reasons have been advanced by those seeking to explain this gruesome statistic. The first is that the Soviet Union had not signed international conventions protecting prisoners of war, and therefore its soldiers could expect no protection under international law. Another frequently quoted explanation, one used by Wehrmacht officers testifying at Nuremberg, suggests that the German military was simply overwhelmed by the number of prisoners and that the mass deaths were an unfortunate but natural consequence of insufficient resources. Such factors as weather, battle conditions on the Eastern Front, epidemics and problems with food supply are often cited as other possible reasons. Careful scrutiny, however, shows how frail these arguments are. Germany's armed forces played their role as the vehicle for the Reich's expansion to the full, and through their own deliberate policies caused the premeditated death of millions of POWs. Before Operation Barbarossa began in 1941, the Wehrmacht determined that Soviet prisoners taken during the upcoming campaign were to be withdrawn from the protection of international and customary law. Orders issued to subordinate commands suspended the German military penal code and the Hague Convention, the international agreement that governed the treatment of prisoners. Although the Soviets had not signed the Geneva Convention regarding POWs, the Germans had. Article 82 of the convention obliged signatories to treat all prisoners, from any state, according to the dictates of humanity. In March 1941, Hitler issued what has come to be known as the 'Commissar Order,' which clearly spelled out the future nature of the war in Russia. The coming conflict was to be 'one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be waged with unprecedented, unmerciful, and unrelenting hardness.' It also instructed Hitler's subordinates to execute commissars and exonerated his soldiers of any future excess. 'Any German soldier who breaks international law will be pardoned,' the Führer stated. 'Russia did not take part in the Hague Convention and, therefore, has no rights under it.' At a subsequent gathering to explain the application of this order to senior army officers, General Edwin Reinecke, the Reich officer responsible for the treatment of POWs, told his audience: 'The war between Germany and Russia is not a war between two states or two armies, but between two ideologies — namely, the National Socialist and the Bolshevist ideology. The Red Army [soldier] must be looked upon not as a soldier in the sense of the word applying to our western opponents, but as an ideological enemy. He must be regarded as the archenemy of National Socialism and must be treated accordingly.' Reinecke continued with the admonishment that this must be made plain to every officer taking part in the operation,'since they were apparently still entertaining ideas which belonged to the Ice Age and not to the present age of National Socialism.' Under the direction of the Commissar Order, immediately after capture all Soviet political officers should be killed and that thereafter, under a'special selection program of the SD [Sicherheitsdienst, the Nazi Party's security service], all those prisoners who could be identified as thoroughly bolshevized or as active representatives of the Bolshevist ideology' should also be killed. On September 8, 1941, three months after the start of Operation Barbarossa, Reinecke reminded his subordinates, 'the Bolshevik soldier forfeited every claim to be treated as an honorable soldier and in keeping with the Geneva Convention.' Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, chief of the Abwehr (German intelligence), objected to Reinecke's assertions but was quieted by Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel, who reminded the admiral, 'This struggle has nothing to do with soldierly chivalry or the regulations of the Geneva Conventions.' It is interesting to note that while Hitler's armies felt themselves relieved from the 'niceties' of international law during the campaign, the soldiers of their Finnish, Italian and Romanian allies regularly acknowledged the rights of Soviet soldiers under their protection. The other feeble line of reasoning to explain away the mass deaths of Russian POWs is that the supply problems were out of the generals' control. Here again, however, the facts fail to support the argument. From the very beginning, German military planners expected large numbers of prisoners. Four months before the opening of the campaign, the Wehrmacht calculated that it would capture at least 2 to 3 million prisoners — 1 million in the first six weeks. The true explanation for the millions of deaths lies in the Wehrmacht's very deliberate planning of how it was to treat its prisoners. With the war going Hitler's way in 1941, there seemed little reason to observe the customs of civilized warfare; soon there would be nobody left to object. Rather, what was more important was that the generals prove their worth by demonstrating they were reliable partners in Hitler's ideological war. Traditional norms of conduct were discarded even before the campaign opened. In March 1941, as Reinecke was briefing Wehrmacht officers, plans were drawn up for how army units would collaborate with SS General Reinhard Heidrich's Einsatzgruppen murder squads as the Germans moved eastward. Although a product of Hitler's twisted mind, the manual explaining the particulars of how the Commissar Order would be applied was drafted by Wehrmacht lawyers. Guidelines for the Conduct of Troops in the East called for ruthless elimination of active or passive resistance. While it had been customary following earlier campaigns to issue orders absolving German soldiers of guilt, the Barbarossa Jurisdiction Order of May 13, 1941, had provided these protections before the campaign even began. Perhaps more important, German soldiers were informed of this protection and went into Russia believing there would be no consequence for their subsequent actions. With their plans for invasion and treatment of POWs well in place, the Wehrmacht unleashed Operation Barbarossa on June 22. Its initial success shocked even the victors. The mechanized panzer columns rolled forward almost effortlessly and left in their wake tens of thousands of bewildered Soviet soldiers who were quickly and easily scooped up by infantry units following behind. The cruelty was apparent from the outset. Major General Heinz Hellmich, commanding the 23rd Infantry Division, ordered that white flags were not to be respected. 'There will be no quarter!' he raged. A Captain Finselberg of the division's 6th Infantry Regiment told his troops to take no prisoners, as they were 'useless consumers of food and anyway a race whose extermination would be a step in the right direction.' Panzer Group 3 found prisoners guilty of having taken 'measures against the German Wehrmacht' and shot them out of hand. On June 29, Field Marshal Günther von Kluge ordered, 'Women in uniform are to be shot.' Later, as their excesses ignited a protracted partisan war, the Germans reacted by issuing harsh orders calling for the execution of any Red Army personnel found in civilian clothing. An order to the 56th Infantry Division stated, 'Soldiers in plain clothes mostly recognizable by their short hair are to be shot following their identification as Red Army soldiers.' Villages were razed for sheltering Red Army soldiers, and prisoners were shot in retaliation for partisan attacks or for simply being soldiers. A field court-martial had sentenced a major to demotion for shooting POWs for no particular reason. Hitler intervened and excused the major, stating, 'We cannot blame lively spirits when they, convinced as they are that the German people are engaged in a unique battle of life and death, reject the Bolshevik world-enemy beyond all commandments of humanity.' As a reflection of the racial nature of the war, Jewish prisoners were often held for execution by mobile SD squads or by Wehrmacht commanders. Soldiers from the Soviet Union's Asian republics were frequently shot out of turn, as were loosely defined 'Communist agitators.' So too were the wounded. In October 1942, wounded prisoners being held at Stalag 355 were being shot rather than treated. Seventy others, 18 of whom were amputees, were shot near the village of Khazhyn on December 24, 1942. Those 'lucky' enough to escape the arbitrariness of their first moments as POWs were soon herded westward to begin their captivity. The marches were often as terrifying as combat itself. Nikolai Obrynba, a medic in a Soviet militia battalion hastily raised as the Germans pushed on toward Moscow, was captured in the fighting around Vitebsk. He remembered the exhausting march into captivity: 'It was the fourth day of our march toward Smolensk. We spent the nights in specially furnished pens, enclosed by barbed wire and guard towers with machine gunners, who illuminated us with flares through the entire night. The tail of the column, which stretched from hill to hill, disappeared into the horizon. Whenever we halted, thousands of those dying from hunger and cold remained or they collapsed as we marched along. Those still alive were finished off by soldiers wielding submachine guns. A guard would kick a fallen prisoner and, if he couldn't get up in time, fired his gun. I watched with horror how they reduced healthy people to a state of complete helplessness and death.' Leonid Volynsky also remembered such shootings: 'An exhausted person would be sat at the side of the road; an escort would approach on his horse and lash out with his whip. The prisoner would continue sitting, with his head down. Then the escort would take a carbine from his saddle or a pistol from his holster.' Later, when confronted with these atrocities, General Alfred Jodl of the high command of the army (Oberkommando des Heeres, or OKH) explained them away with the feeble explanation that 'prisoners who were shot were not those who could not, but those who did not want, to walk.' Understandably horrified by what it was seeing, the civilian population became restless and uncooperative. To counteract this, an OKH report of August 1941, just three months after the invasion had begun, stressed that 'force, brutality, looting and deception should be avoided in order to win over the population' and that the treatment of POWs was a major source of hatred for the Germans. Alarmed that the will of the troops would be weakened by such kindly treatment toward the enemy, Jodl carefully noted in the margin of the report, 'These are dangerous signs of despicable humanitarianism.' Deliberate brutality and forced marches thinned the ranks of the POWs, but it proved to be an insufficient means of ridding the Germans of their unwanted burden. To further winnow the ranks, rations were systematically withheld from the prisoners. Food was earmarked for German use, and the army was to live off the land and dispatch any surplus to the Reich. Captured food worth 109 million Reichsmarks was sent to Germany from Russia between July and December 1941 alone. This distribution of resources was done with the full cooperation of the army, which acknowledged in another report, 'Thereby tens of millions of men will undoubtedly starve to death.' Prisoners marched through the rear area of Army Group Center, for example, were getting only 300 to 700 calories a day. Those attempting to supplement this bounty by grabbing food from fields passed along the way were instantly shot. In many cases even the civilian population was barred from assisting the prisoners. Dr. Evgeny Livelisha of the 44th Rifle Division remembered: 'The peaceful civilians came to meet us, and tried to supply us with water and bread. However, the Germans would not allow us to approach the citizens, nor would they let them approach us. One of the prisoners stepped five or six meters out of the column and without any warning was killed by a German soldier.' While the initial success of Barbarossa had been significant, the Germans failed to subdue the Soviet Union by the time the first snows fell in November 1941. The worsening weather made combat operations difficult for the German soldiers struggling to reach Moscow and caused the lot of their prisoners to grow even worse. When winter weather made it impossible to move prisoners by road, Wehrmacht directives were issued to have most men transported by rail but only in open wagons. In December 1941, between 25 and 70 percent of prisoners transported in this way perished en route. A prisoner named Gutyrya would be forever haunted by his trip to Stalag 304. 'The experience in the wagons can hardly be described in words,' he remembered. 'Wounds bled and turned everything black. Men died in each wagon. They died of blood loss, tetanus, blood poisoning, or hunger, thirst and suffocation as well as other deprivation. This inhumane ordeal lasted for 10 days. The journey came to an end. At noon they unloaded the men. The dead were thrown out onto the platform.' Whether by foot or by rail, the ultimate destination of most prisoners in 1941 were Russenlager, camps built specifically to house Russian prisoners and managed by the Wehrmacht. Organizational Order Number 37 of April 30, 1941, stipulated that the camps were to consist of barbed-wire enclosures and watchtowers. The Wehrmacht discounted the need for hospitals or canteens — quicklime and cooking pots were to be provided instead. Few of the camps had barracks of any kind. As cold weather set in, the inmates were forced to dig shelters into the earth. The commandant of Stalag 318 noted that his charges were 'digging holes in the ground with their mess-kits and bare hands' as early as September 1941. Pavel Atayan was one of those who resorted to such improvised shelter. 'You just had to dig yourselves a hole in the ground to sleep in and we slid inside there, four at a time; you had to find room to bend your legs. We were really cold. It was winter. Every day they sent a cart to pick up the dead.' When the frost and snow came, however, even those shelters were of little use. Many died of exposure in that living hell, but far more died through starvation. The frontline army policy in Russia of withholding food was continued in the camps, which given their fixed location should have been able to receive and distribute what was necessary. Although some prisoners were doubtlessly hungry when captured, the bulk of the deaths in 1941 actually took place hundreds of miles from the front, weeks or months after capture. As administrators of the Russenlager, it was the OKH that set the amount of rations to be supplied or withheld. The quantity, to say nothing of the quality, of the food received by the Soviet POWs was set far below the minimum required for human survival. Xavier Dorsch noted that in the camp he helped guard at Minsk, 'The problem of feeding the prisoners being insoluble, they have largely been without nourishment for six to eight days and are almost deranged in their need for sustenance.' Another guard, Johannes Gutschmidt at Dulag 203, recorded in his diary that conditions in his camp soon reduced the prisoners to beasts. 'There was nothing to eat, not even any water. Many died. Finally they gave them dry macaroni and they fought over it.' Victor Yermolayev was on the receiving end of such largess. 'After a few days, they began throwing us packets of semolina, dehydrated semolina, they threw them to us…some caught them…and others couldn't. We fell on it like wolves!' The commandant of Stalag 318, a Colonel Falkenberg, noted on September 11, 1941: 'These cursed Untermenschen [sub-humans] have been observed eating grass, flowers and raw potatoes. Once they can't find anything edible in the camp they turn to cannibalism.' 'The prisoners live in the open air,' a witness to conditions at the Karolowka camp reported. 'At the camp the hunger is so terrible that a mile away they can be heard groaning and shouting `Food.' They eat grass. Dozens die from starvation.' A Hungarian tank officer recalled: 'I woke up one morning and heard thousands of dogs howling in the distance. I called my orderly and asked, `Sandor, what is all that moaning and howling?' He answered: `Not far from here there is a huge mass of Russian prisoners in the open air. There must be 80,000 of them. They are wailing because they are starving to death." Rations scarcely resembled food at all. The prisoners' bread was specially formulated for Russians by the German Ministry of Food on November 24, 1941. The ministry advised its bakers that 'a useful mixture consists of 50 percent rye bran, 20 percent residue of sugar beet, 20 percent cellulose flour and 10 percent flour made of straw or leaves.' When made aware of these conditions, Reichsmarshall Hermann Gring and his staff helpfully suggested that the prisoners be allowed to eat cats. The Ministry of Food replied: 'Animals not normally consumed will never do much to satisfy the need for meat. Rations for Russians will have to be based on horse meat and meat stamped by inspectors as unfit for human consumption.' Gabriel Temkin, taken prisoner in 1942, remembered some of those meals. 'All we were getting to eat was watery soup with pieces of rotten meat, a diet that was literally decimating us. It was the flesh of dead horses killed and lying alongside the roads since the German air strikes in the first week of July that was now to become our staple. The horses, their swollen bellies and open wounds full of white maggots and other parasitic worms, were collected by prisoners on adjacent roads.' As the campaign continued, conditions in the camps became even worse. The army revised rations — downward. On November 13, 1941, the quartermaster-general, a Colonel Eduard Wagner, stated boldly that sick prisoners'should starve' and that rations for the remaining prisoners should be reduced — just before the onset of winter. Even those enmeshed in the Nazi regime saw that, had the will been there, the prisoners could have been fed. Alfred Rosenberg, the Reich minister of the Eastern Territories, complained to Field Marshal Keitel, 'In the majority of cases, the camp commanders have forbidden the civilian population from putting food at the disposal of prisoners and they have rather let them starve to death.' Allied officers at Colditz were barred from sharing Red Cross parcels with Soviet prisoners. In 1940 French POWs had been allowed to take supplies from German reserves. No such rights were granted officials supplying Soviet prisoners. Under such deplorable conditions, disease began to stalk the camps. Tetanus and blood poisoning, diphtheria, malaria, pellagra, tuberculosis, pneumonia and typhus decimated the camps. In Stalag 304, prisoner Gutyrya remembered that in the wake of starvation, 'the typhoid fever epidemic began.' He continued: 'Up to 500 men died of this illness each day. The dead were thrown in mass graves, one on top of the other. Misery, cold weather, hunger, disease, death. That was camp 304.' If the question had been simple logistics, as was later claimed, then the offer of outside assistance should have been readily accepted. Such was not the case. A Red Cross overture of vaccination equipment in the winter of 1941, during the epidemic, was rejected by Hitler. Soon the Wehrmacht began to formulate its own system for dealing with the sick and diseased. Many were quarantined in isolation camps; others were shot. In December 1941, one camp commandant noted that 1,000 wounded or sick prisoners had been brought to open-air collection points 'where they mostly soon perished in the cold.' At Stalag 324, it became customary for the sick to be shot once a week. An epidemic of dysentery at Stalag 359B led to a grisly final solution. Between September 21 and 28, 1941, Police Battalion 306 launched Operation Chickenfarm, which saw some 6,000 Red Army prisoners shot by German troops — 3,261 of them on the first day. In the subsequent report detailing the murders, victims were described as 'laid eggs.' The result of all this abuse was that the daily mortality in an average camp was from 80 to 150 men. By January 1942, this equated to an average of 6,000 men per day. Less than a year after the start of Operation Barbarossa, in April 1942, a total of 309,816 prisoners had died in the camps in Poland alone. One German official in the occupied territories coldly noted that as of February 19, 1942, of the 3.9 million prisoners taken to that point, only 1.1 million remained in the camps. Some 280,000 prisoners, mainly Balts and Ukrainians, had been given the dubious privilege of being sent from almost certain death in the Russenlager to begin the slow death of work as slave laborers. The rest had simply perished. When the process of 'disposing' of excess prisoners through abuse or neglect proved to be inefficient, the Wehrmacht streamlined their system by turning to the experts. Prisoners sent to Munich's Stalag VIIA for forced labor were inspected upon arrival by local Gestapo agents. Of the 3,778 prisoners who arrived, some 484 were found to be 'undesirable' and immediately sent to concentration camps and murdered. While it is true that in this instance the Wehrmacht did not carry out the actual executions, it had released the prisoners from its control, placed them on the trains that took them to Germany and, once the loading had been completed, marked the prisoners' identity cards with 'transferred to the Gestapo.' Those prisoners sent to Stalag VIIA were not the only ones to receive such treatment. Sachsenhausen concentration camp alone executed 9,090 Soviet POWs between August 31 and October 2, 1941. Auschwitz, Buchenwald, Dachau, Flossenburg, Gross Rosen, Mauthausen and Neuengamme all received similar 'deliveries,' which they handled in a like fashion.In addition to supplying labor for Germany, the Wehrmacht was also quite happy to provide prisoners for medical experimentation. In one such case, a Dr. Berning killed 12 prisoners from Stalag 310 while performing experiments on their digestive systems. In another, prisoners were shot using dum-dum bullets so the effect of the munitions could be assessed. The policy of deliberate extermination eventually abated as the realization began to sink in that the campaign in Russia would not be the lightning victory that had been planned. Only in the late autumn of 1941, when Germany's wartime economy began to feel the strain of the now global conflict, was the decision made for the greater employment of POWs. From then on, surviving Soviet prisoners were used as slave labor. Many were dispatched to the Reich's coal mines — between July 1 and November 10, 1943, 27,638 Soviet POWs died in the Ruhr coal pits alone. Others were sent to Krupps, Daimler Benz or farmed out to countless smaller companies. Although the generals later claimed that they were busy fighting the war and were thus not responsible for what happened behind the front, the fact remains that the Wehrmacht retained responsibility for the prisoners destined to forced labor, assigning their rations, allocating them to specific industries, guarding the columns as they headed west and maintaining the miserable Russenlager. When the prisoners eventually succumbed, it was Wehrmacht personnel who recorded their deaths and registered and oversaw their burial. Giving the lie to later claims that 'they did not know,' German civilians regularly witnessed bands of weary, starving Russian prisoners moving throughout their country. They were not the only ones. As more and more Russians were sent westward, they were frequently collected in camps that were next to the POW compounds set up for prisoners from the other Allied countries. The abuse of Russian prisoners had become such that American, British and French POWs frequently commented on the mistreatment they witnessed. After the war, when the full horror of what had transpired in Hitler's Reich became known, the Allies set up criminal courts to try the worst offenders. While the SS and other police organizations were, correctly, confronted with their crimes, the Wehrmacht largely escaped such scrutiny. Although a few high-ranking generals were tried, including Jodl and Keitel, Wehrmacht personnel who had actively participated in the systematic abuse and murder of Soviet POWs went unpunished. The fact remains, however, that the Wehrmacht actively assisted in the planning and execution of the war. It is also undeniable that its conduct of the war included a POW system that violated international treaties and the rules of war in its treatment of Soviet prisoners. This was vastly different from its treatment of other Allied prisoners. Contrast the way in which the Wehrmacht safely herded 2 million French prisoners into the Reich in 1940 with the death marches of Russian prisoners of late 1941. The Wehrmacht actively formulated the way Soviet prisoners should be deprived of the protection of international law, handed prisoners over to the SD for execution, set starvation rations, deprived prisoners of essential medical assistance, organized a system of camps designed to be primitive, farmed prisoners out for slave labor and deprived them of rights normally associated with POW status. Most damning is that those excesses were the result of deliberate planning prior to the invasion of Russia and were not the unfortunate result of the 'chaos' of war. Despite the Wehrmacht's feeble efforts to hide its crimes behind a veil of secrecy, Russian soldiers and civilians were well aware of the mistreatment. Such knowledge strengthened the resolve of the Soviets to fight on until it was the Germans who were on the defensive. It also ensured that as Soviet armies advanced westward, their wrath would be terrible. There can be no excuse for the horrible excesses committed by Soviet troops in Germany, but the Wehrmacht's treatment of Russian prisoners might serve as one possible explanation for their behavior. Far more than half the Soviet soldiers taken prisoner by the Germans during the course of World War II died in captivity. Sixty years later, a full accounting of the Nazi regime and the brutality of the war on the Eastern Front requires that politicians, legal authorities, historians and students of the war hold the Wehrmacht accountable for its actions and seek justice for its victims.
This article was written by Jonathan North and originally appeared in the January/February 2006 issue of World War II magazine. For more great articles subscribe to World War II magazine today!
45 Responses to “Soviet Prisoners of War: Forgotten Nazi Victims of World War II”Leave a Reply
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
|
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer! Copyright © 2012 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||


[...] town.http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080405/wl_afp/oly2008sporttorchchinarightsrussia_080405154412HistoryNet ? Soviet Prisoners of War: Forgotten Nazi Victims of …Statistics show that out of 5.7 million Soviet soldiers captured between 1941 and … the [...]
this is my fathers name,he was from the checkrebublick and at one of the prisons,he made it out of ther,but in 1955 he disapeard and was never heard of again.can you help.
It's spelled Czech Rebublic, dimwit.
Czech RePUBLIc, not Rebublic, wise one!
I'm looking for my uncle, (V)Biktor(nikname-Duru)Sakheishvili,missing since WW2.The words spread, he was captured, but he managed to escaped.Please help me to find out,whether he is dead or alive.
My father, Gunter Junicke, was in a Siberian Gulag. He was captured the day after WWII was declared to be over, in Berlin Germany. Does anyone have any information about Siberian camps, and how or whom may have helped my father return to Berlin?
Good one jonathon north! do you also write articles about the way the german prisoners were treated? or the mutilations inflicted on german prisoners from the first days of operation barbarossa? or the the habit of the running over of german prisoners by tanks? or the 90,000 Cossacks and their wives and children handed back to the russians at the end of the war after being promised they wouldn't be by the british? or the 10 million ukrainian peasants deliberately starved to death by stalin? Was there any combatant, ALLIED or AXIS that DIDN'T commit an atrocity during the second world war? Why don't you spend your time searching for those instead of re-hashing the same old information that I get crammed down my throat EVERYTIME I look at ANYTHING about WW2!!! Then maybe you won't look like some 2 bit copy cat! Sorry, BORING copy cat!
If i was a russian in 1941-45 I would hardly give a damn about a humane treatment of Greman POW's. Paul Buhler, I don't know if you are able to try and walk in their shoes…It requires certain empathy. Germans started this brutal war on Russia why do u expect Russians to adhere to international law when Germans didn't?????? Totally agree with Russian. my grandad was in that war too and he reached Vienna. so many of my friends alo lost their grandparents in this war. ok Stalin was horrible but Russians and other USSR nations were not fighting for his sake! they were fighting for the sake of their families and their land. in Russia it is called great Patriotic War. during the war Stalin was very popular and he generated big consensus. At the end of the day he won this war. I am sorry but Stalin's crimes although terrible are a different matter and not a topic of this article.
I was born and raised in USSR and as someone who knows everything first hand I would agree with you but only to part of it, why Soviet people fought Hitler. In everything else you are wrong, especially: "during the war Stalin was very popular and he generated big consensus. At the end of the day he won this war. I am sorry but Stalin's crimes although terrible are a different matter and not a topic of this article."
1. Stalin as much responsible for starting WW2 as Hitler. If you would like me to explain I would be happy to do so.
2. Stalin didn't win the war, Soviet people did. Stalin was more if incompetent. There is a theory that he in fact wanted that war.
3. By Stalin's orderWW2 Soviet POWs were considered to be traitors of USSR and sent by Stalin to concentration camps (camps were as bad as nazi's were), so by this only reason Stalin's crimes is a topic of this article. My grandfather was one of them. Private, called to Red army in 1941, captured by nazi in July 1941, from 1941-1945 in Mauthausen, experienced all Nazi atrocities you hear about Holocaust (though he was Ukrainian), liberated by US Army, went back home and spent next 8 years until Stalin's death in Soviet concentration camp. Such examples are counted by millions.
4. Stalin was the one who refused to sign Geneva convention, so he is ultimately responsible for what happened to any Soviet POW.
5.If you truly empathize with Russian people to close your eyes on what happened to them because communism came to power is wrong thing to do. The only way you can assure that such thing doesn't happen again is to speak the truth about everything what happened in Soviet Union including crimes committed there toward anybody and speak loud.
Shorter Paul Buhler – "Two Wrongs makes a Right".
Russians had it coming.
They have always behaved in war like beasts.
Just remember Poland, Finland, Ukraine, Hungary, Chechnia and Afghanistan.
They've got what they deserved.
What, Anton? If I remember correctly it was the Mujahadin/Taliban "freedom fighters"(armed, trained and financed by the CIA) who flayed Soviet soldiers alive and threw acid in the faces of Communist female teachers who were trying to teach Afghan women to read.
Excellent article, too little is known of the crimes of regular German army in the East.
I note that most of the other 'Comments' are by people who usually post on Stormfront…..
grandfather died in palatki smolensk february 1942. he was a commissar, his name was nikolai turubanov from kurgan republic. Was there a battle in palatki or just the big prisoner of war camp. Are there mass graves in this area.
400,000 nazi soldiers were captured in the battle for Stalingrad. Only 91,000 of them made it to the POW camps in Siberia. The Soviet Union did not release their nazi POW's until 1947 and by that time only 5,000 of them were alive. My grandfather was one of those 5,000. He was not a member of the nazi party and always said that the reason he went to war was so that his sons could stay behind a work their farm. My grandfather once told me that when it comes to war you don't think about your wife, kids, etc…. your training kick in and your just trying to stay alive. Many people do things during war that they wouldn't do under normal circumstances. People know it's wrong but they are afraid to speak up and have the group turn on them. Does this make them monsters? We have women being attacked by groups of men in public, people starving on our streets, and children being abused next door but most people turn a blind eye because we don't want to get involved! Does that make us monsters?
My greandfather
My grandfather fought in this war, he survived from the beginning of 1942 and took Vienna in 45. He had never told me that Russians were brutal to Germans, these sausage-eaters were protected by low, by the commissars they so liked to kill!
Waffen SS soldiers, in general, were not detained; he told me that they were killed on the battlefield by soldiers. It is not amazing – Russian soldiers saw what they have done! They have made a desert on the place of tightly populated regions during just couple of years. But the common Wehrmacht soldiers were spared, over 2.5 millions came back to Germany after Stalin’s death in 1956. Mortality rate in Russian camps was much lower than in German, at least nobody exterminated people there like animals.
It is not casual events when brigades of panzer SS troops surrendered to 2-3 Americans they happily met on their way in April-May 1945. When SS officers quietly and being absolutely adequate killed they families, and then shot themselves. War gave us a lot of such examples. These guys knew what they have done in Russia! They were afraid!
Unlike this “awful” comrade Stalin many Russian generals would barely be so kind with Germans! A lot of them lost their whole families in the flame of the war! What they could do – simply give weapon to yesterday POWs and do the same as Germans did right before the invasion of Russia 22.06.41-say that they can do everything they want with Germans! They did NOT do that!!!
So misters and misses Germans you must understand that you were very, very lucky that you met “monstrous Russian beasts”, but not you civilized neighbors, they would never forgive you things like you have done in Russia!!!
Remember it and never forget that Germany was re-borned in May 1945, thank to Russian generosity and kindness. It was the most generous and expensive gift which has ever been done. It coasted over 25 millions lives!!!
Think about that.
Dear bahsgrl
As a Finn I must state that your comment of the human russians is a great piece of scrap. Rapers of 3 million german female.
I don´t go to details but my country has really felt the kindness of this Great Comrade. During last 800 years more than 100 years of war. Our losses in WW2 equal if US would have lost 18 million men instead of 440k.
Finland was NEVER occupied and the commies losses were astronomous , thanks a lot to our german counterpartis and their arsenal .
thanx 4 having this wonderful site avalable 2 the public!!!
We cannot change the past. All the victims because of a Nazi regime. We can only learn from it in order to be better.
We can only try not to be like Hitler and be against all kind of 'slavery' like 'sex slavery' of women from 'poor' country.
Against reality that people are starving or cannot purchase a home or a reality that people are trying to 'devalue' other people because they are Jewish or Musulman or Christiens etc.. Lets try to be better.
To respect others.
A world that people have different languages, appearence, faith is a more interesting rich world.
Hitler was a crazy sick person.
We should learn not to be like him. We should try to create a better world with mutual Respect no matter the class of the person his origion and religion.
Whether he is beautiful or ugly, slim or fat
The past is DEAD
We have only the FUTURE
siege of Leningrad
I am often haunted by information that many Leningraders ignorant of lightning German advance towards their city had send their children to summer camps,right in the path of the invaders. Though many children were rescued,over 200,000 innocent children were captured by the Germans.what happened to them?.How many survived German captivity or worse.Ref 900 DAYS-SIEGE OF LENINGRAD.Could you please give me some information on this, ´´´ ¨¨
Best regards
R K RAO
War is hell, and ask any soldier he will tell you that. It is usually only the politicians and ignorant that revel in the declaration of war. Every war has its heroes and animals, across the divide. I know of many German heroes, Soviet heroes and Yank and British heroes, and the many acts of bravery that took place throughout the war years. Be careful of generalisation, and understand that when you release the dogs of war, the first casualty will always be the truth, and thereafter death and cruelty take over. War is hell, lets learn from that and not defend anybody or any country who advocates murder.
Thanks for the article.
I always find it so convenient for historians to disassociated the rise of the Axis Powers (yes Hitler was not alone) with the economic terrorism that was being inflicted upon Europe, Middle East, India, China and North Africa.
As if Hitler just suddenly appeared out of thin air to destroy the world! Thats what today's established scholars would love everyone to believe.
If Hitler was such a lone mad man i find it hard to believe he was able to align himself with so many other powers within the world.
Could it be the Rise of the Axis in WWII was a directed reaction to British Global Imperialism and Zionist International Corporations who held no loyalty to their host nations?
Much as we still see to this day in America who's industrial industry has been exported for the sake of international corporate greed?
Does this alternate historic scenario require too much thought amongst the establish 'boogieman' trumpeters?
It makes for SUCH better theater doesnt it? Creating villains for the pilgrims to fight.
The British Empire is on its Death Bed. America better decide which side its on this time round.
And there will be another 'time round'
Dad, as he gets older, is finally telling me some stories. His family lived on a farm in Finland. Three Russian prisoners of war were sent to the small town and one man lived with with Dad's family. Dad was 12 when Sergei arrived, whom Dad felt must have been in his 40's at the time. Dad would point at things and draw items in an attempt to communicate and as kids do, he picked up some Russian. He told me that Sergei taught him many things, including a device they used in Siberia at the time to hunt. The house would get so cold in the winter that water would freeze. The POW's could come and go as they wanted and Sergei shared meals with the family around the table. Dad then told me that it came to the attention of the officials that the 3 POW's in this town were not being treated harshly enough. They were collected one day and my father, who never displays emotions, had to pause when he told me that Sergei began to cry when he had to leave. He took the address and wanted to get in contact when the war ended. He was never heard from again. You know, most of those people were just hard working, nonpolitical guys with loved ones missing them in some far-off locale. Too bad there wasn't a happy reunion for all involved.
die Behandlung der sowjetischen Soldaten war schrecklich. es muss russland sehr weh tun und ich glaube tut immer noch weh.dieses trauma erfordert ein langes heilungsprozess,wenn man es überhaupt heilen kann.
gut, dass man überhaupt darüber spricht. denn solange man das nicht verarbeitet hat, wird es keine Zukunft geben. Schweigen bringt uns nicht weiter.
mother russia is allways with us
This article is true in the instances it quotes, but it is written to make a point and makes no attempt at context or balance. The Russians for instance, until later in the war, basically didn't take prisoners, they simply torutured and murdered any Germans that surrendered.
Whereas the survival rate of Russian prisoners was about 40%, the survivial rate of German prisoners at Stalingrad was only 5%. The article is absolutely silent about Russian treatment of German prisoners. Why?
Many Germans were undoubtedly brutal towards Russian POWS. Given them regularly seeing the mutalated bodies of Germans attempting to surrender that was a regular feature on the Russian front, it is somewhat understandable.
Many frontline German soldiers and officers were not brutal towards prisoners however.
When the Russians counterattacked in the Crimea in 1941/42, the Russian POWs in Manstein's camps voluntarily fled with the German army.
I've never been a fan of authors who tell one side of story. They are biased, and this dilutes the value of what they write.
Do not refer to the survival rates of POWs taken in Stalingrad, it has no sence since (these 90.000 is a small drop of more than 3 millions taken together during the war).
Do not forget that these POWs were captured by the country were the civil population and army starvated due to war that germans has started! Would you expect thay should be fed by black caviar after imprisoning?! It was done a lot to save the miserable lives of these murederers-maniacs, many of them survived the war and told people like you what thay experienced! On the way from from the border to Stalingrad thay have alredy killed and tortured millions of civilians. Of almost 3 millions Russian POW taken during the first 4-5 monthes of blitz krieg germans had intentionally exterminated more than 2 millions during the first winter: starvation, diseases and mass killings also in conc. kamps.
Ainzatsgruppen killed civilian population of Russian ethnicity as pleasurely as jews. Of 27 million died Russians in the war the soldiers of the Red Army consisted only 8.3 millions, other were women, children and old men!!!
Therefore as a Russian I simply do not understand why germans' effecive industry of mass killings, they factories of death like Aushvitz and Osvenzim, has not been used against them after they lost the war. To pay them the same coin: "NO MERCY TO FASHISTS" isn't it?! Unfortunately, comrade Stalin was very philanthropic creature!
i agree with you completely
I think that as the survival rate of prisoners surviving at stalingrad was 5% that the survival rate of prisoners that were capured by russians e.t.c. should have been much lower even though the survival rate was 40% for the russians if it had been me in charge I would not have even started taking prisoners if I needed information or something like that I would have just tortured them and then killed them as that is probably what they would have done to me given the chance.
Excellent article. It is interesting how some people react to the FACTS you are presenting. Since those facts do not agree with their ideas, they react as if they were personally insulted or something like that.
I think we need to be more open. We need to seek for the truth. The truth is not what our media tell us. It is not what soviet media told them. It is not what nazi media told the germans. We have to investigate, because, sadly, media says what is "politically correct" to be published. Three examples:
1) A chorus said: Irak has massive destruction weapons. The chorus repeated it. It was correct, it was patriotic.
2) Everybody heard about the six million dead jews, few about the twenty (or more) million dead russians. Conclusion (in the minds): There were more jews' dead than any other people's.
3) Many of us thought it was only the SS, or the special extermination detachments. Now we all know that the Wehrmacht was involved. Yes, the cold war was a golden chance for thousands of war criminals…
If we are open minded, we can learn more, and work for a better future.
Sorry for my english, it is not my native language.
Max
It has been proved beyond any doubt that STALIN and not
HITLER, was the biggest mass murderer in the History of man-kind.Hitler murdered hundreds of thousands mentally
challenged,terminally sick and even physically handicapped
Germans,as "use-less eaters".He deliberately starved and killed
millions of Russians and Jews.All this pales compared to the
crimes against humanity committed by Stalin,He killed millions
of his own people duling mass collectivization and man-made
famine in the Ukraine and other regions.It was Stalin's policy
to keeep 12-14 million peiople in camps to be employed as slave
labour,majority of whom died of disease and hunger
Stalin did not killed his own people; he was not russian nor ukarainians, he was georgians. He destroyed "the enemy of people as a class". His own people was international revolutionaries . I am wondering how people especially in western countries accuse russians for all the killings and persecutions during the Soviet time, because of the leaders of the communist regime were not russians but all minority nations of the USS; jews, georgians, armenians, baltic nations and even polacks and finns.
I watched the pianist last night on tv and it prompted me to find this site. It stated at the end of the film that the officer who fed and let the pianist live. DIED IN A RUSSIAN PRISON IN 1952. Why was he still in prison at that time i thought the russians let the German pow's go in the late 1940's. When did the last german pow die in russia and what did russia do to them.
Strange how watching a film can spark such interest in a subject.
[...] – 1944. gada septembris". Yearbook of the Occupation Museum of Latvia 2000: pp. 87–153. [15] "Soviet Prisoners of War: Forgotten Nazi Victims of World War II", History Net. [16] [...]
[...] – 1944. gada septembris”. Yearbook of the Occupation Museum of Latvia 2000: pp. 87–153. [15] “Soviet Prisoners of War: Forgotten Nazi Victims of World War II”, History Net. [16] Ibid. [17] [...]
if anything at all is found on Seargent Konstantin Franz Herrmann out of his fighting in Italy or later in his ties with CUBA i SUSPECT. fAMILY WOULD DEARLY LIKE TO KNOW WHAT HAS HAPPENEND AND HAVE SOME CLOSURE. pLEASE LET US KNOW 209-931-4032, A DEATH CERTIFICATE WOUDL BE NICE TO HAVE IF AT ALL POSSIBLE.lAST SEEN IN THE CARRIBEAN IS ALL i KNOW. HE WOULD BE 90 YEARS OLD NOW. THANKS SO MUCH.
non parlo inglese. mio padre si chiamava Konstantin Franz Herrmann ed era nato a Geithain (ex DDR) il 24 giugno 1921. E' morto il 11 agosto 1978 in Italia. Vorrei conoscere i suoi familiare. aspetto con ansia una risposta. Grazie. Il mio nr di telefono(+39) 328.4034594.
Yes anything to do with American Seargeant Konstantin Franz Herrmann, & a last sighting of him in the Carribean would be very very much appreciated or anything about him. I would like to find his grave & possible anything else I can find out about his whereabouts in the Carribean area, maybe why he was there. His family would like any news of any kind. Write to A. Herrmann (War Heroes), 3431 Cherryland Avenue Space #24, Stockton, CA 95215 for anything at all on him. Thanks P.S. He orchestrated an escape from Italy and saved many men's lives some of whom I hope see this Reply. Thanks
[...] HistoryNet: Soviet prisoners of war – Forgotten Nazi victims of World War II [...]
[...] HistoryNet: Soviet prisoners of war – Forgotten Nazi victims of World War II [...]
The last paragraph:…
Another guard, Johannes Gutschmidt at Dulag 203, recorded in his diary that conditions in his camp soon reduced the prisoners to beasts. 'There was nothing to eat, not even any water. Many died. Finally they gave them dry macaroni and they fought over it….
is wrong. Johannes Gutschmidt was a Camp Commander of certain camps (Dulags) who wrote a diary. He wrote in his diary (the quotqtion above appears 07.01.1941):
30. 6. 1941 (Bielsk)
Today a prisoner arrived who had smashed the complete jaws until the ear by shots and the front part was shot off completely.
For he had shots in the region of the heart too, he wasn't supposed to survive according to the physiscian. He reived a lot of morphium but woke up very alive after a while. I took a numer of pictures of him. When he was taken to the civilian hospital he asked to be driven seated and not on a stretcher and also that I take some more pictures of him. The next day I visited him in the hospital and the chief surgeon said that he will make it due to his strong constitution. We have now received 8 large boilers and 22 Russian field kitchens. Now larger numbers of POWs can arrive: we are prepared.
I1. 7. 1941 (Bielsk)
In the afternoon a major from the OKH was on visit and was quite astonished that we have warm food for the POWs. We "found" 2500 litres of gasoline. Food for the POWs we receive plenty, fish,small sardines, corn, ..We also receive horses. Those with broken legs or exhausted that they cannot stand anymore. Our camp is becoming more beautiful each day and the discipline is improving.
8. 7. 1941 (Sluzk)
In Minsk a camp was prepared for 30.000, it had to be stuffed with 140.000. There was nothing to eat, not even water. Many died. Finally they gave them dry maccaroni to eat, on which they desperately threw themselves. They are guarded by soldiers riding on captured horses. Those guards have long whips and even shoot. However they don't get discipline into the camp, the hunger is too big. However I haven't seen the camp…
9. 7. 1941 (Sluzk)
I couldn't sleep the whole night and awoke in my tent at 3.45 a.m.. Numerous farm wives from the neighbourhood brought us milk and eggs, refusing to take money. In Bielsk the Secret Field Police shot 30 Jews with doubtable justification, in Minsk they shot even one hundred. It is ashaming how this police is raging. We do our best to behave correctly towards the Russians and the police behaves the opposite direction. They say that those jews have committed acts of sabotage. However not one case of sabotage has occured.
12. 7. 1941 (Sluzk)
Today a prisoner was brought who had been escaped some days before and was caught again today. Because he behaved rather offensive, I put him under arrest for 10 days. Besides this the POW make a calm impression, we have no difficulties with them. But they realize soon that we have only good in mind with them, caring for that they have enough to eat and do all our best for their woundeds. My physician allways has enough band-aids and medicaments, but we also like to give woundeds to the civilian hospitals. That means to set them into freedom, for the hospitals have no reason to treat them furtherly as prisoners.
my great grand father is missing in action in world war two he is russian his name is ivan danielovich morozkin we think he might have been tooken to prison in germany those idiots are mean and cruel if you have any info plz replay:)
[...] of War: Forgotten Nazi Victims of World War II". HistoryNet.com. Weider History Group. http://www.historynet.com/soviet-prisoners-of-war-forgotten-nazi-victims-of-world-war-ii.htm Richard Overy gives the number of 5.7 million Soviet POWs. Of those, 57 percent died or were [...]
The 20th century has been the most brutal in recorded history. This fact can be contributed to the removal of God in these socities. Communist Russia, Nazi Germany, Red China, Imperial Japan all either removed organized religon or held their leaders up as devine. When a socity has no higher moral code to answer to…there is no end to the level of inhumanity they can inflict on their fellow man.
I found this article very informative but also found one glaring error: the author incorrectly referring to the German Army as the Wehrmacht. The German Army was not the Wehrmact but was the Heer. The Wehrmact is the name for the entire armed forces of Nazi Germany. The Kriegsmarine was the German Navy and the Lufftewaffe was the German Airforce. It is amazing how many author's continue to make this mistake.