Shreveport Under Siege: The Louisiana Maneuvers, Phase 2 | HistoryNet MENU

Shreveport Under Siege: The Louisiana Maneuvers, Phase 2

By Robert M. Citino
5/12/2011 • Fire for Effect

Last week we looked at the opening round of the U.S. Army’s Louisiana Maneuvers in 1941. It was an exercise without a great deal of flash or excitement, but rather one designed to give a newly formed army some seasoning and a green officer corps some experience in maneuvering large formations in the field.

After four days to separate the armies, reorganize them, and return them to their start-lines, Phase 2 of the Louisiana maneuvers began. This time, the Blue Army (LTG Walter Krueger) was both twice as large as Red (LTG Ben Lear) and equipped with its own armored division, the 2nd, which had switched sides since Phase 1. Blue’s mission was advance upon and seize Shreveport, Louisiana. Krueger’s able chief of staff, COL Dwight D. Eisenhower, decided to send his armor on a wide sweep across the Sabine river to drive round Red’s western flank, break into the rear, and attack Shreveport from the north. The Red force was much smaller and tasked largely with positional defense for a 100-mile zone south of the city. Lear decided on a slow retreat, accompanied by massive demolitions that would slow down the pace of Blue’s advance.

Business as usual so far, but we need to introduce another factor into the equation. Some of you have no doubt read Malcolm Gladwell’s 2008 book Outliers. In science, “outliers” are anomalous events that cannot be described by theory. Gladwell believes that there are people we can consider outliers, “men and women who, for one reason or another, are so accomplished and so extraordinary and so outside of ordinary experience that they are as puzzling to the rest of us as a cold day in August.” Gladwell argues that every organization has its outliers, and that successful ones know how to use them and put their talents to good use. Indeed, this phase of the maneuvers would feature one of the greatest outliers in U.S. military history. Commanding Blue 2nd Armored Division on its great ride west would be none other than “Mr. Outlier” himself, MG George S. Patton, Jr.

Patton's end-run in the Louisiana Maneuvers. Click for larger image.
Patton's end-run in the Louisiana Maneuvers. Click for larger image.
Patton showed his flair for maneuver by launching his division on a top speed, 3-day, nearly 400-mile end run into Texas, passing through Woodville, Nacogdoches, and Henderson and slashing into the rear of the Red position (see map). By the end of the maneuver on September 29th, he had fought his way to the outskirts of Shreveport , and one of his reconnaissance battalions had actually overrun Barskdale airport, the headquarters and principal base of Red’s 2nd Air Task Force, and taking the entire staff prisoner. The Red command seemed paralyzed by the threat, and in fact Lear would protest that Patton had taken his division outside of the legal maneuver area. According to one biographer, Patton came back with a snarky “I am unaware of the existence of any rules in war.” During his ride through Texas, he had actually supplied himself through purchases made from local gas stations along the route (rather than the approved 5-gallon “jerry can” then in official use, hundreds of which were needed to fuel an armored unit).

Patton emerged from Louisiana one of the army’s rising stars and would be heard from again. Indeed, the maneuvers determined the cohort of field commanders who would fight the war in Europe. Of the 42 divisional, corps, and army commanders who took part in the fall exercises, U.S. Army Chief of Staff General George C. Marshall would relieve or pushed aside 31 to make way for younger officers. It had taken a while, and it was just in time, but the U.S. Army was getting ready to rumble.

The Louisiana Maneuvers were indeed a reflection of a U.S. “way of war” as it had evolved over a century and a half. It was an army that preferred the broad-front advance to the single-axis penetration. It ground you down, it didn’t slice you up. And yet, it also had its share of “outliers,” freethinkers who didn’t mind tearing up the rulebook. Finally, the maneuvers showed that there was one thing this army could do, something that it would prove it again and again in the ETO: if it found a seam, some operational elbow room, it could move like lightning. You took your eyes off the U.S. Army at your own risk. It was something that the Wehrmacht would have to discover, but might already have known if it had paid any attention at all to the Louisiana maneuvers.

For more discussion of the war, the latest news, and announcements, be sure to visit World War II Magazine’s Facebook page.

3 Responses to Shreveport Under Siege: The Louisiana Maneuvers, Phase 2

  1. Patrick Hays says:

    If used right field maneuvers can be a very usefull tool in training an army to fight. It can show things that you can and cannot due, It can reveil short comings in command and control, doctrine and men and equipment. However, maneuvers are only as good as the staff that evaluates the results. It also requires that the higher command takes the results(good and bad) to heart and truely acts on the information. It seems that Marshall was shown shortcommings in some of his commanders and he was able to sidetrack most of them.

  2. Phil Ridderhof says:

    I just discovered your blog and have been enjoying go back through older posts. On this one, i was curious to see how you framed the Blue Army’s deep maneuver as coming from Eisenhower, the chief of Staff, and not Krueger, the Army commander.
    I know that Eisenhower owes some of his rise to his reputation built in these maneuvers, but the scholarship I’ve read (Keith Holzimmer) indicates that his role in these decisions was much less than frequently attributed to him.
    I will admit being a fan of both Krueger and Eisenhower, but beleive that the former has been generally overlooked in history. The campaigns of the 6th Army in the southwest Pacific are amazing in terms of flexibility and planning. Kreuger, not an easy going man, was unfortunate to work for MacArthur, who claimed all credit, and also in competition with Eichelberger, who felt he was a better general and also craved the spotlight.

  3. Bill Wilson says:

    From the map, Patton came up thru my town of Longview, Texas then north and over to Shreveport. I need to see if our local newspaper has any old articles about that since this is news to me. I suppose he took that wide detour because the roads were better and often paved thanks to the many oil fields plus gasoline was plentiful thanks to the small refineries along the way.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

, , , ,

Sponsored Content: