| |

Scopes TrialAmerican History | Single Page | 11 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post Travelers wandering through Dayton, Tennessee, in mid-July 1925 might have been excused for thinking that the tiny hill town was holding a carnival or perhaps a religious revival. The street leading to the local courthouse was busy with vendors peddling sandwiches, watermelon, calico, and books on biology. Evangelists had erected an open-air tabernacle, and nearby buildings were covered with posters exhorting people to 'read your Bible' and avoid eternal damnation. If there was a consistent theme to the garish exhibits and most of the gossip in Dayton it was, of all things, monkeys. Monkey jokes were faddish. Monkey toys and souvenirs were ubiquitous. A soda fountain advertised something called a 'monkey fizz,' and the town's butcher shop featured a sign reading, 'We handle all kinds of meat except monkey.' As comical as this scene sounds, its background was anything but amusing. Sixty-six years after Charles Darwin published his controversial Origin of Species, the debate he'd engendered over humankind's evolution from primates had suddenly reached a fever pitch in this hamlet on the Tennessee River. Efforts to enforce a new state statute against the teaching of evolution in public schools had precipitated the arrest of Dayton educator John T. Scopes. His subsequent prosecution drew international press attention as well as the involvement of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). It also attracted two headliners of that era–Chicago criminal attorney Clarence Darrow and former presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan–to act as opposing counsel. Bryan characterized the coming courtroom battle as a 'duel to the death'–one that would pit religious fundamentalists against others who trusted in scientific conclusions, and would finally determine the right of citizens to dictate the curricula of the schools their tax dollars supported. The case rapidly took on a farcical edge, however, as attorneys shouted at each other and outsiders strove to capitalize on the extraordinary publicity surrounding this litigation. (At one point, for instance, a black man with a cone-shaped head who worked New York's Coney Island sideshows as Zip, the 'humanoid ape,' was offered to the defense as the 'missing link' necessary to prove Darwin's scientific claims.) The 'Scopes Monkey Trial,' as history would come to know it, also included a personal dimension, becoming a hard-fought contest not just between rival ideas, but between Bryan and Darrow, former allies whose political differences had turned them into fierce adversaries. Crusades to purge Darwinism from American public education began as early as 1917 and were most successful in the South, where Fundamentalists controlled the big Protestant denominations. In 1923, the Oklahoma Legislature passed a bill banning the use of all school texts that included evolutionist instruction. Later that same year, the Florida Legislature approved a joint resolution declaring it 'improper and subversive for any teacher in a public school to teach Atheism or Agnosticism, or to teach as true, Darwinism, or any other hypothesis that links man in blood relationship to any other form of life.' To Fundamentalists, for whom literal interpretation of the Bible was central to their faith, there was no room for compromise between the story of God's unilateral creation of man and Darwin's eons-long development of the species. Moreover, these critics deemed evolutionist theories a threat not only to the belief in God but to the very structure of a Christian society. 'To hell with science if it is going to damn souls,' was how one Fundamentalist framed the debate. John Washington Butler couldn't have agreed more. In January 1925, this second-term member of the Tennessee House of Representatives introduced a bill that would make it unlawful for teachers working in schools financed wholly or in part by the state to 'teach any theory that denies the story of the divine creation of man as taught in the Bible.' Violation of the statute would constitute a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not less than $100 or more than $500 for each offense. Butler's bill flummoxed government observers but delighted its predominately Baptist backers, and it sailed through the Tennessee House on a lopsided 71 to 5 vote. It went on to the state Senate, where objections were more numerous, and where one member tried to kill the legislation by proposing an amendment to also 'prohibit the teaching that the earth is round.' Yet senators ultimately sanctioned the measure 24 to 6. As the story goes, many Tennessee lawmakers thought they were safe in voting for this 'absurd' bill because Governor Austin Peay, a well-recognized progressive, was bound to veto it. However, Peay–in a prickly political trade-off that won him the support of rural representatives he needed in order to pass educational and infrastructural reforms–signed the Butler Act into law. As he did so, though, he noted that he had no intention of enforcing it. 'Probably,' the governor said in a special message to his Legislature, 'the law will never be applied.' Peay's prediction might have come true, had not the ACLU chosen to make the statute a cause célèbre. Worried that other states would follow Tennessee's lead, the ACLU agreed in late April 1925 to guarantee legal and financial assistance to any teacher who would test the law. John Scopes wasn't the obvious candidate. A gawky, 24-year-old Illinois native, he was still new to his job as a general science teacher and football coach at Rhea County Central High School. Yet his views on evolution were unequivocal. 'I don't see how a teacher can teach biology without teaching evolution,' Scopes insisted, adding that the state-approved science textbook included lessons in evolution. And he was a vocal supporter of academic freedom and freedom of thought. Yet Scopes was reluctant to participate in the ACLU's efforts until talked into it by Dayton neighbors who hoped that a prominent local trial would stimulate prosperity in their sleepy southeastern Tennessee town. Subscribe Today
Tags: American History, Politics, Social History
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
11 Comments to “Scopes Trial”
very boring
By ahshantee smith on Feb 24, 2009 at 2:58 pm
this is extremely borin and it makes me wanna cry!!!!
By octavia thompson on Feb 24, 2009 at 3:26 pm
this is the dumbest article i've ever read in my life, and it makes me want to jump off a bridge head first into a pool of acid.
By Kristen Raine on Feb 24, 2009 at 3:28 pm
do not read this if you want to keep yourself awake
By mr.keane on Feb 24, 2009 at 3:28 pm
its only boring if your mentally challenged and don't take the time to read it you idoits. if you understood it you'd be interested fricking retards. you all probably should go jump off a bride head first into a pool of acid. (good one kristen raine) real orginal…
By Bo Jangles on Mar 1, 2009 at 10:38 pm
lmao
By alex odom on Mar 3, 2009 at 12:06 pm
I kind of like it. Whomever thinks its boring can get off
By ben dover on Mar 14, 2009 at 2:49 pm
I found this article to be fascinating, informative, and of course, not a little sad, although the contemporary results of this historic trial are heartening and hopeful.
What an impressive service you provided, in this presentation, to those of us interested in the story of the Scopes's trial. [Yes, apostrophe s is how to make possessive the word Scopes, despite the bad time my computer is giving me vis-Ă -vis this name.]
By Jacqueline Bandel on Apr 12, 2009 at 3:16 pm
This helped me out with my thesis paper. Now I must site the darn thing. xD Thank you, whoever posted it.
By Bri on Apr 28, 2009 at 12:25 am
Well octavia, then why in the world did you read it?
By Charlotte on Jun 29, 2009 at 7:18 pm
if you are to ignorant to understand the meaning of this the shut up and go elsewhere….i myself find this to be some intresting info that just shows how much state and church seperation is…it may be seperated but it still affects us just as good…..politically and mentally on everything.
By Wesley Mitchell on Jul 9, 2009 at 2:13 pm