Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link Weider History Group RSS feed Weider Subscriptions Historynet Home page

Nez Perce War

Originally published by American History magazine. Published Online: June 12, 2006 
Print Friendly
29 comments FONT +  FONT -

From across a freezing Montana battlefield on October 5, 1877, Chief Joseph of the Nez Perce rode into the camp of U.S. Army Colonel Nelson Miles and surrendered his rifle. 'I am tired,' he said. 'My heart is sick and sad. From where the sun now stands I will fight no more forever.' With those words he ended the war between 750 Nez Perce–500 of them women, children, and elderly–and 2,000 soldiers, a four-month battle that had ranged across 1,200 miles. 'Our chiefs are dead,' Joseph told Miles. 'The old men are all dead… The little children are freezing to death.'

Joseph would never again live on the land for which he had fought. The American government sent him and the 430 Nez Perce who surrendered with him to Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. Those who survived the malaria there were later moved to Indian Territory. Eventually some returned to live on the Nez Perce reservation, close to their former home. In 1885 Joseph was exiled to a reservation in Washington Territory, where he died on September 21, 1904.

The origins of the war that caused Joseph and the Nez Perce so much hardship and grief lay in the Wallowa country of northeast Oregon. For generations it had been the Nez Perce homeland, but the arrival of white settlers in the region led to violence. Settlers killed as many as 30 Nez Perce during the 1860s and '70s, yet few of the accused ever stood trial, and those who did were acquitted.

One such fatal confrontation occurred on a summer day the year before Joseph's surrender. Two settlers from the Wallowa Valley rode into a Nez Perce hunting camp searching for missing horses. When they rode out, a Nez Perce warrior named Wilhautyah (Wind Blowing) lay dead, shot by one of the settlers. The recoil from that shot started a chain of events that led to the Nez Perce War.

At the time of Wilhautyah's death, the Nez Perce were embroiled in a struggle to remain on their ancestral homeland. The roots of conflict stretched back to an 1855 treaty that gave the Wallowa country to the Nez Perce and an 1863 treaty that took it away after gold was discovered on Indian land.

Old Joseph, Chief Joseph's father and the leader of the Wallowa band, refused to sign the second treaty. His Nez Perce considered the valley their home, even as homesteaders began building cabins and planting crops there. Other Nez Perce did sign the treaty and agreed to live on the Lapwai Reservation in Idaho Territory. They were known as the treaty Nez Perce.

In 1873 President Ulysses S. Grant issued an Executive Order that divided the valley between homestead sites and an Indian reservation. Two years later, Grant gave into pressure from whites wanting to settle there and revoked the order, reopening the entire valley to settlement and sealing the fate of the Nez Perce. It was only a matter of time before they would be forced from the Wallowa Valley and onto a reservation. Unaware of what lay ahead, Indians and whites lived as reluctant neighbors until the day Alexander B. Findley noticed five of his horses were missing.

According to Union County Circuit Court records, Findley, one of the valley's first settlers, spent several days 'thoroughly searching all the range my horses had run on since I had them.' When on June 22, 1876, he came across a Nez Perce camp in the northern foothills, he decided his'suspicion that my horses were stolen were confirmed. I immediately returned to get assistance to search for my horses or their trail and try to recover them.'

He got help from three men, including Wells McNall, a 21-year-old known as an Indian-hater and troublemaker. Though the men saw no horses when they returned to the camp, Findley remained convinced he had found horse thieves. 'We found tracks comparing or corresponding with my horses,' he said. He and McNall went on alone, following the tracks to a hunting camp containing a cache of venison. Findley 'told Mr. McNall we would return home and get more help.'

The next morning, however, Findley and McNall rode back to the second camp alone and watched from a distance. After about 90 minutes a Nez Perce approached from the woods, and the two white men rode down to meet him. By the time they reached the camp, three Nez Perce were there. One of them was Wilhautyah, a close friend of Chief Joseph of the Wallowa Nez Perce band. Exactly what happened next is subject to debate.

Findley said he dismounted and grabbed a Nez Perce weapon leaning against a tree, one of three hunting rifles in the Indian camp. '[I] told the Indians I believed they had stolen and we wanted them to go to the settlement until we had an understanding about the matter. They did not consent to go.'

According to Findley he then put the Nez Perce rifle beside one that had been lying on the ground, and McNall laid a third rifle that had been near him beside the others. With the Indians unarmed, Findley and McNall again tried to persuade them to go to the settlement. The Nez Perce again refused, an argument erupted, and Wilhautyah and McNall ended up wrestling for McNall's rifle.

'The next thing I knew,' Findley said, 'McNall called on me to shoot.' Then McNall's rifle fired. 'About the time of the report,' Findley said, 'I cocked my gun and held it ready, waiting to see the result of the scuffle over the gun of McNall. Resolved not to shoot until I saw our lives were in danger.' When Findley fired, it seemed to surprise him. 'I had not decided to shoot when I heard the report of my gun,' he said. 'I was not conscious of pulling the trigger.'

When recounting the story years later, Findley's son, H.R. Findley, described a different ending, saying that the fight started when Wilhautyah grabbed McNall's rifle, and the struggle lasted until a desperate McNall began cursing Findley, demanding that he shoot. 'It was then that [my father] took careful aim and killed Wilhautyah,' the younger Findley said. Whether the killing was accidental or deliberate, the two white men quickly left the scene. When word of the incident spread settlers feared Nez Perce retaliation. Some barricaded themselves in McNall's blockhouse-like cabin.

The next morning, the settlers persuaded McNall to ride to the county seat of Union and report the incident to County Judge E.C. Brainard. Unsure of how to handle the situation, Brainard wrote a letter to Colonel Elmer Otis, the commander of Fort Walla Walla. 'More trouble in the Willowa,' Brainard wrote, 'one Finley and McNall accuse the Indians of stealing horses, and have managed to kill one of Joseph's band. The settlers are sufficiently alarmed to mass in the valley.'

To make matters worse, three days after the killing Findley found his missing horses grazing near his home. 'Blowing Wind was an honest man,' said Peopeo Tholekt of the Looking Glass band of Nez Perce, 'and the horses being found proved him innocent.'

His killers, however, were still unpunished, and as Wallowa settlers prepared to defend themselves, John Monteith, the Indian agent at the Lapwai Reservation, met with Joseph to hear the Nez Perce version of the story. Afterwards, Monteith wrote to General Oliver Otis Howard, commander of the U.S. Army's Department of the Columbia, which had jurisdiction over the Wallowa country. Monteith's letter called the killing 'willful, deliberate murder.' Yet he advised Joseph to let white law determine justice. 'I told him to keep his people quiet and all would end well.'

Howard, a veteran officer who had lost his right arm in the Civil War, was a religious man who gained the nickname 'Old Prayer Book' for his distribution of tracts and Bibles to his troops during the war. He sympathized with the Nez Perce cause and sent Major Henry Clay Wood, his assistant adjutant general, to Lapwai. As a lawyer, Wood had studied the Nez Perce case and concluded that 'The nontreaty Nez Perce cannot in law be regarded as bound by the treaty of 1863.' He was also critical of President Grant's revocation of the 1873 Executive Order, saying, 'If not a crime, it was a blunder.'

At Wood's request, 40 Nez Perce rode from Wallowa to Lapwai for a council on July 22-23. During the meetings, Joseph spoke of how among Indians, the chiefs were responsible for controlling their young men and preventing them from doing 'wicked things,' and if the chiefs did not restrain or punish unruly Indians, the chiefs were held accountable. To Joseph, then, white authorities were responsible for the killing of one 'much respected by the tribe.'

Joseph also cited the killing as one more claim the Nez Perce had to the land. 'Since the murder had been done,' Wood reported Joseph saying,'since his brother's life had been taken in Wallowa valley, his body buried there, and the earth there had drunk up his blood, the valley was more sacred to him than ever before . . . and that all the whites must be removed from the valley.' Ollokot, Joseph's brother, added that 'he did not want the whites, Findley and McNall, tried and punished for their crime, but wished them to leave that section of country that he might never see them more.'

Wood told the Nez Perce that Howard had proposed that the U.S. Government appoint a commission to settle once and for all the ownership of the Wallowa country, and he asked the two Indians to let white law deal with Findley and McNall. Both Joseph and Ollokot agreed to this, and the Nez Perce returned home. Afterward, Howard wrote to Brainard to insist that the two men be tried for murder. But in August, Findley and McNall were still free.

Tensions grew. Some believed the Nez Perce were preparing for war; warriors spent their days shooting arrows at targets set up near the Findley home. 'Several war dances were held,' H.R. Findley said, 'and the beating of their drums or tom-toms could often be plainly heard from their [Findley] cabin.' Yet some white settlers continued to harass the Indians by stealing livestock, and against Joseph's advice a few Nez Perce retaliated in kind.

During councils held at Indian Town, the Nez Perce summer encampment at the confluence of the valley's two rivers, Joseph and the older chiefs advised against doing anything that would give whites an excuse to force them onto a reservation. The young men, however, had lost patience with white justice. The time had come for retribution. They agreed to move slowly and avoid force for as long as possible. When the meetings ended, the Nez Perce had decided on a course of action.

On September 1, Nez Perce riders traveled through the valley, stopping at every settler's cabin and delivering the message that all whites, including Findley and McNall, were to attend a council the next day at Indian Town. Seventeen settlers showed up, but Findley and McNall stayed home. At the meeting, the Nez Perce insisted that the whites leave the valley and turn over McNall and Findley. When the settlers refused, the meeting ended with an angry agreement to meet the next day at the McNall cabin.

The next morning 60 warriors rode to the cabin, where a number of settlers waited with the Findley and McNall families. When the Nez Perce repeated their demands and the settlers again refused, Joseph warned that if they did not turn over the two men and leave the valley in one week's time the Nez Perce would drive them out and burn their houses. Then the Indians rode away. The clock started ticking toward Sunday, September 10.

After dark, a few settlers rode through the valley to warn others, and Ephraim McNall, father of Wells, traveled to Fort Walla Walla to plead with Lieutenant Albert Gallatin Forse to send troops to Wallowa. Forse refused.

Denied military assistance, McNall headed back to Wallowa, stopping along the way to recruit armed volunteers. When Forse learned about this new development he changed his mind about sending troops. On September 7 he rode out of Fort Walla Walla with a company of 48 cavalrymen to protect the Nez Perce and prevent a war.

After riding all night, 22 volunteers from the Grande Ronde Valley reached McNall's cabin on September 9 and joined with the settlers to form a force of 43 men. Because the Nez Perce had moved their main camp close to Wallowa Lake for the beginning of the salmon run, 15 men rode that way to help settlers there. The next day they moved on to a nearby ranch, where many settlers had agreed to gather.

Forse's troops had already arrived at the ranch at 1:00 a.m. on Sunday, the day of Joseph's deadline. 'I found about 50 armed men,' Forse noted of the gathering, 'also several families, who there sought protection.' Later, even more families and volunteers arrived.

After leaving some militia at the cabin for protection, Forse moved his men and most of the volunteers up the valley to Alder and the home of Thomas H. Veasey, who was friendly with the Nez Perce and spoke their language. Forse and Veasey then continued on alone to meet with Joseph at his camp, seven miles away.

According to a local newspaper report, Forse and Veasey found Joseph 'at the head of 100 painted warriors on the summit of a hill near his camp, drawn up in line of battle, his men divested of all their superfluous blankets, well armed and mounted on their best war steeds, all decorated with war paint and presenting a formidable appearance.'

Forse was looking for a solution, not a fight, and he recognized the Nez Perce advantage. 'Joseph could have fallen upon the settlers in detail, killing them and destroying their property,' he said. 'An enemy could not approach him without being under his fire for the distance of more than a half-mile.'

Forse got down to the business of negotiating. He asked to see Joseph, whose appearance and character made an immediate impression on the lieutenant. 'I thought he was the finest Indian I had ever seen not only physically but intelligently,' Forse said. 'He was about six feet in height, powerfully built, and strength of character written on every feature.'

With Veasey interpreting, Forse 'asked him if he would be satisfied if McNall and Findley were tried by the civil authorities,' and 'He said he would.' In an attempt to avoid future trouble, Forse requested that the Nez Perce stay away from the settlers and confine themselves to the Wallowa Lake side of Hurricane Creek. Joseph agreed, and to show his good faith he and his men discharged their guns into the air. A truce had been called.

The next day Forse'sent word to McNall and Findley by two of their friends advising them to go to Union and surrender themselves.' They followed his advice. Three days later, on September 14, the court released McNall after ruling he had acted in self-defense, but Judge Brainard issued a warrant for Findley's arrest, charging him with manslaughter. After his arrest Findley was released on $250 bail.

Meanwhile, that same day Forse met again with Joseph to persuade him to send the two Nez Perce witnesses to testify at the trial. Forse offered to send along one of his noncommissioned officers as an escort. Joseph consented, but only with great reluctance. 'He was afraid that whites would harm them,' Forse said. Joseph might also have realized that sending witnesses would accomplish nothing.

The next day, Forse sent a corporal to escort the Nez Perce witnesses. He also sent a letter to Brainard, 'requesting him to see that they were taken care of.' Less than a week later, however, Brainard dismissed the charges against Findley. The two Nez Perce witnesses had refused to testify. Perhaps they feared reprisal or felt their cause was doomed anyway. Either for personal or diplomatic reasons, Findley requested that his case continue, and he faced a grand jury in October. Once again, the charges were dismissed.

Because of the missing testimony, the Nez Perce version of the events remains obscure. Battle, imprisonment, and disease later killed many in the band. Yet one eyewitness who survived, Eskawus, said years later that the Nez Perce hunting party was headed home that day when they stopped to pick up the deer they had hung in the tree.

'So Wilhautyah was told to climb the tree,' Eskawus recalled, 'because he was a small man, and while up the tree, unloosing the ropes, the Indians on the ground saw two white men coming at full speed. A little way off they stopped and got off their horses and shot Wilhautyah.' Whatever occurred that day, Findley's and McNall's pleas of self-defense prevailed in court.

Forse and his men headed back to Fort Walla Walla on September 26, 1876. On his ride back through the valley, Forse 'found everything quiet.' The peace was not to last. Earlier that summer Sioux and Cheyenne warriors had wiped out troops under Lieutenant Colonel George Custer at the Battle of the Little Bighorn. The disaster put an end to the army's patience and to much of the public's sympathy for Indian rights.

To avoid future confrontations, the government had to attend to the issue of removing the Nez Perce from the Wallowa country. Howard used the Wallowa incident to press for a five-member commission to decide how to get the Nez Perce onto a reservation. On October 3, 1876, the secretary of the interior appointed General Howard, Major Wood, and three easterners, David H. Jerome of Michigan, A.C. Barstow of Rhode Island, and William Stickney of Washington, D.C., to the commission. According to Mrs. John Monteith the last three members were 'excellent men… all kings of finance, but with not a speck of Indian sense, experience, or knowledge.'

Joseph met with the commission at Lapwai in November and rejected its offer to buy what remained of Indian land, arguing eloquently that the Nez Perce should be allowed to stay there. But the commission's recommendation to the Department of the Interior stated, 'That unless in a reasonable time Joseph consented to be removed [from Wallowa], he should be forcibly taken with his people and given lands on the reservation.' Major Wood, however, refused to sign the document. Joseph, unaware of the commission's report, went with his people to their winter encampment in the Imnaha canyon.

In April and May 1877 Joseph and his brother Ollokot met three times with General Howard and others trying to convince them that although the Nez Perce did not want to fight, they had the right to stay in the Wallowa Valley. By May 14, an impatient General Howard decided that 'reasonable time' was up, and he gave the Wallowa band 30 days to move to the reservation. 'If you are not here in that time,' he said, 'I shall consider that you want to fight, and will send my soldiers to drive you on.'

To avoid war, the Nez Perce were prepared to do as Howard ordered, but violence found them anyway. On their way to the reservation, with 10 days left of freedom, the five nontreaty bands came together in a gathering of about 600 Indians. The young men staged war parades and rode around simulating battle. On June 13, two days before they were due at the reservation, a warrior named Wahlitits and two companions decided to seek revenge on a white man, Larry Ott, who had killed Wahlitits' father two years earlier. When they couldn't find Ott they waited a day then went to the cabin of a man known to be cruel to Indians and shot him. Roused by this first act of vengeance, they killed four more settlers and wounded one other. Soon other warriors joined them in a series of raids.

'For a short time we lived quietly,' Joseph later said about the pre-war days. 'But that could not last.' One shot from a settler's rifle helped shatter a fragile peace and set the Nez Perce on the path to war.

This article was written by Mark Highberger and originally appeared in the December 1998 issue of American History. For more great articles, subscribe to American History magazine today!

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to American History magazine


29 Responses to “Nez Perce War”


  1. 1

    [...] Americans continued to be pushed off their lands and for years the Nez Perce had been struggling to keep the lands of the Wallowa Valley in northeastern Oregon as the flow of [...]

  2. 2
    Danielle S. says:

    this is stupid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  3. 3
    Johny Man says:

    Americans are such sheep, Nez Perce was a conspiracy like nine eleven!Don't believe it all :/

  4. 4
    Charmaine says:

    this is probably one of the saddest incidences of the abuse of American military on the natives. all they wanted was peace, they were leaving anyway, why did we have to kill them? they were even christians, and we murdered their women and children. thats so sick. and the fact that people still look down on Native Americans. ha, and the slaves thought they had it tough, the blacks think they're discriminated against! ain't nothin compared to this

    • 4.1
      Roselina says:

      This is another sad example of how the U.S abused a race of people. But the atrocities we did to African American people and the Native American people is equally horrifying there is no say in whether either group of people had it worse. Many ethnic groups through out history were abused by the federal government and the truth behind it all is a deep racism that ran through out the whole country. All because someone looked different from the rest of the "normal" people they saw everyday, which therefore in many American minds proved that they were superior human beings.

  5. 5
    Camilla Suazo says:

    The horrors of which some europeans gave to the Native of our land was a hash and crewel in-counterment. Although this happened to us (the Natives) we must understand that this is history. History is a cycle of events, what we did then is never to be done again. Sadly points like this happen, like the Holocaust, black slavery, Indians (from India) dealing with the British Empire, so we have to think, this happens to all races, not just one.
    To Mr. Jonny Man, maybe some things are over exaggerated and people do believe what is said to them. But it is ours, yours, my anyones job to listen to the other side of the story.
    Have a beautiful day
    P.S. And yes I am a Native American from Taos Pueblo and also am Navajo.
    Also I am 16, you can never be too young to express those thoughts of a topic or an opinion.

  6. 6
    Raymond C says:

    i need more info for my project on the Nez Perce indians and the white man

  7. 7
    Tayler Rayon says:

    Well jeez. I feel bad about being white now. They did some horrid stuff.

  8. 8
    koma / Theos says:

    Koma: awwwwwwwwwwww poor indians

    Theos: I find the indian wars disgusting. We keep making it look like their fault, or they were the bad guys when we truly did a lot.
    We slaughtered millions, even when they did nothing against us.
    And to a couple people who decided this was something unimportant…
    I hate you. :]

  9. 9
    Marina and Maddie says:

    Ok, were doing this project so we looked this up . I

  10. 10
    Michael Skinner says:

    i do not recall… well much of this seems…. well im not saying anything but my native history/language advisor never mentioned most of this.

  11. 11
    A.C. says:

    interesting. the one thing I can say is that, yes the "white man" was cruel to the native americans, however, the indians aren't perfect. don't call me racist or a bigot or whatever, b/c I have native blood. all I am saying is that bad things happen, and there is bad and good on both sides.

  12. 12
    Kayla Toby says:

    i need more info for my project this doesn;t help me at all!!!!!!!!

  13. 13
    Mike Hawk says:

    American are definantly not sheep

  14. 14
    Purplebumblebee says:

    White man is a pretty generic term, what they did to the Nez Perce was horrible and F-d up but Americans today are not like that. You cannot say that someone is horrible for something their great great grandfather did 140 years ago.

  15. 15
    Lolie lolie lolie POP! says:

    i need more info for a project

  16. 16
    Jim says:

    I'm gonna bet that Johny Man also loves the T Party. After years of personal research, there is no question the whites (of which I'm one) were at complete fault in starting the hostilities. Another treaty (1855) was broken by the Government that took land away from a people who had occupied the territory for a 1000 years. I would suggest Mr. Man shut his mouth and spend more time in the military archives. There I found that even the Aid De Camp to General Howard saw how unjust the war was. Colonel Miles who defeated the Nez Perce at Bear Paw fought for years to allow the Nez Perce to return to their home land. General Howard who was the righ wing of General Shermans march through Georgia from the very beginning saw how unjust the war was but he was a soldier first and did his duty as he was ordered. Wake up Johny. You can't change history or the truth.

  17. 17
    Tater :) says:

    I need more info for my project… this sucked!!

  18. 18
    Taylor says:

    I know thats how the settlers were back then they got in to wars with every one for no important reason :(

  19. 19
    catz says:

    A truer statment has not been said in recent history, but i do have to say most of this WAS our (the \white mans\) fault.

  20. 20
    mackenzie says:

    none of this would have happened if we had left the natives alone

  21. 21
    Robert says:

    This story, while terrible in its own right is not as much about white vs. Native American, black slavery, etc. This is the unfortunate nature of man. Before the white man arrived, rival tribes warred with each other over land, took members of other tribes as slaves, etc. Sacagawea is a perfect example. She was taken from her tribe and sold to the French fur trader who she later married.

    Wars over land, slavery, etc. in North America isn't limited to the white man by a long shot, nor is it limited to North America. The tribes brutally slaughtered each other, drove other tribes from their land, etc. The white man just eventually had superior numbers and firepower so they prevailed in dominating the continent. If the Lakota Sioux, for example, who were already dominating the other tribes in their region had grown over time and the white man never shown up, they may have eventually ruled the continent.

    The diseases brought by the settlers caused hundreds of times more deaths to the natives than did warfare. It was unintentional, but devastating nonetheless. But although not deliberate, you can see how hate could linger over it.

    Man's innate greed for power and control goes on today all over the world, much of it is disguised, using religion as their justification, but it's still just a big land-grab for the resources and control of them.

    While the white man has enjoyed a pretty good run as masters of this country, his days may be numbered and karma's a bitch. He will be in the minority soon and the way he treated African Americans, Native Americans and now the Hispanic Americans, a drastic change could be in store and the white man may find himself put onto reservations one day.

    History often repeats itself and if this melting pot of ours doesn't get back to some serious melting and blending together peacefully and fairly, the human nature of wanting control and the power to seize that control could change hands some day. Maybe not too far into the future, either.

  22. 22
    Brian says:

    I happen to be the great great grand-son of Major Henry Clay Wood. It has always been a source of pride to me that Major Wood sided with the Nez Perce. He was one of the few white men that stood up for the Nez Perce in their attempt to retain ownership of their land in the Wallowa Valley. Major Wood served with distinction and honor during his career as a regular army officer. He received the Medal of Honor for his actions at the Battle of Wilson's Creek, Missouri, August 10, 1861. He retired as a Brigadier General.



Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Related Articles


History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer
HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
STAY CONNECTED WITH US
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer! | StreamHistory.com
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2013 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy