Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link World History Group RSS feed World History Group Subscriptions Historynet Home page

Murder in Tombstone: The Forgotten Trial of Wyatt Earp (Book Review)

Originally published on Published Online: June 12, 2006 
Print Friendly
0 comments FONT +  FONT -

Reviewed by Johnny D. Boggs
By Steven Lubet
Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, Conn., 2004

Is there anything left to say about the October 26, 1881, fight in which three Earp brothers and Doc Holliday killed Billy Clanton and brothers Tom and Frank McLaury in Tombstone, Arizona Territory? After all, the Gunfight at the O.K. Corral (which didn't take place at the corral) lasted less than 30 seconds, and several other Wild West shootouts had higher body counts. Of course, the Tombstone street fight did have quite an aftermath, and reverberations from the event would be felt for years afterward. So what's the verdict?

In Murder in Tombstone, Steven Lubet, a law professor at Northwestern University, concentrates on the immediate legal proceedings after the gunfight. After a coroner's inquest proved inconclusive, Ike Clanton, one of the gunfight's instigators who, unarmed, fled shortly after the shooting started, filed first-degree murder charges against the Earps and Holliday. What followed over the next month was a legal courtroom thriller–call it Perry Mason Meets Gunsmoke. "We tell ourselves that trials are about truth," Lubet writes, "but they are also very much about clarity. The most convincing case wins, not necessarily the truer one."

Technically, Lubet's subtitle, The Forgotten Trial of Wyatt Earp, is a misnomer because the case never went past Judge Wells W. Spicer's preliminary hearing. Spicer, who had defended John D. Lee years earlier during the infamous Mountain Meadows Massacre case in Utah Territory, found insufficient evidence to proceed with a trial, and a grand jury failed to indict. Yet the hearing proved dramatic enough, especially with the arrival of Texas attorney Will McLaury, brother of the deceased Frank and Tom, to assist with the prosecution. "The case against the Earps, with its dueling narratives of brutality and justification, played out themes of intrigue, betrayal, duplicity, revenge, and even adultery," Lubet writes. History buffs and John Grisham wannabes will enjoy defending or prosecuting Lubet's analysis and assessment of The Territory of Arizona v. Morgan Earp, et al., and most will reach the verdict that Murder in Tombstone is a refreshing take on an Old West legend.

Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Related Articles

History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet? is brought to you by World History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
World History Group

World History Group Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer!
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2015 World History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy