Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link World History Group RSS feed World History Group Subscriptions Historynet Home page

Letter From May 2007 America's Civil War Magazine

Originally published by America's Civil War magazine. Published Online: March 16, 2007 
Print Friendly
0 comments FONT +  FONT -

When pursuing the truth about history, few would be able to use, and few would likely approve of, the methods of Major General Smedley D. Butler. In 1921, when he doubted that "Stonewall" Jackson's amputated left arm had been buried in a small cemetery on a tranquil Virginia farm, he ordered some of his Marines to dig deep and find out if the story was true, a frontal assault for finding facts. The controversy such a rash action would cause today can only be imagined.

When his dutiful Marines did in fact find the remains of the general's arm, a chastised Butler had it reburied and had the brass plaque pictured here placed at the grave. The plaque is currently kept in a National Park Service storage facility.

Alexandra Filipowski and Hugh T. Harrington were also skeptical about the contents of a grave, but they took a much more unobtrusive approach to checking their hunch that Edwin Jemison, whose famous image graces this month's cover, was not buried under his tombstone in Milledgeville, Ga. They were correct. Using a variety of sources, they determined that Jemison was in fact not buried in Georgia.

America's Civil War published their findings in May 2004, and that article is available online at for you to read again if you like. In that same issue, we also published a story by Civil War historian William J. Miller that dealt with the manner in which Jemison reportedly died at Malvern Hill. Miller based that article, "The Two Pictures of Private Jemison," on a Confederate veteran's recollections that he had found at the Richmond National Battlefield.

Miller is a respected, thorough historian, and his article reflected his skills. But when Fili­powski and Harrington read it, something triggered a Butlerian skepticism, and they again begin to dig — no pun in-tended — into the Jemison story. The results of their second round of research follow on P. 28. Without giving too much away, suffice it to say that they come to a different conclusion about what happened to young Jemison. The duo also uncovered interesting information about the Rebel soldier who claimed to have witnessed Jemison's demise.

For years, skeptics have said that everything about the Civil War has already been revealed, and there is nothing new to learn. Don't tell Filipowski and Harrington that. In the interesting new information department, they're two for two.

Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Related Articles

History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet? is brought to you by World History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
World History Group

World History Group Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer!
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2015 World History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy