Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link Weider History Group RSS feed Weider Subscriptions Historynet Home page

Letter From February 2007Vietnam Magazine

Originally published on HistoryNet.com. Published Online: December 20, 2006 
Print Friendly
0 comments FONT +  FONT -

Military Intelligence and Other Oxymorons

This issue's article about CIA analyst Joe Hovey is a cautionary tale of one of the biggest intelligence failures in modern American history. Like all intelligence failures, it is all very clear now what was happening back then and the conclusions that should have been drawn—but only in hindsight, and that's the rub.

Intelligence has always been as much an art as a science. It's complicated stuff. Those who criticize intelligence practitioners the loudest—journalists, academics, politicians, students—are those who have never had to do it themselves or had to bear the responsibility for the consequences.

Although I spent most of my own military career in the combat arms, military intelligence is my secondary military occupational specialty, and I did spend a couple years working in the field. I can't count the number of times I've had people tell me dismissively: "Military intelligence! Boy, there's the ultimate oxymoron."
Well, perhaps. But I can think of a number of oxymorons that are even more absurd. Academic freedom is one that comes to mind.

This issue's article on Dr. Gerald Hickey illustrates most poignantly the highly selective nature of the principle of academic freedom in the modern United States. After spending some 17 years working in Vietnam, this accomplished and widely respected anthropologist was denied a tenured university position because his work was tainted by his long association with the U.S. government, and especially the military. That's code for his work being ideologically suspect—or politically incorrect, in today's vernacular.

What academic freedom all too often means is that any professor or college student can say anything he wants, no matter how stupid or outrageous, so long as no one is offended in any way. The exceptions, of course, are anyone with even slightly conservative social or political beliefs, people in business or anyone involved in the actual production of wealth, males of European descent and, of course, all branches of law enforcement and the military. It's perfectly OK to offend any of those groups all day long.

My own introduction to the world of academic freedom came when I returned to college in early 1970. It was the age of "do your own thing," but it damn well had better be compatible with the "thing" of the Campus Thought Police. It was OK to be a Vietnam vet on campus back then, but only if you were deeply ashamed of your military service and abjectly apologized for committing nonexistent war crimes.

Today's poster boys of academic freedom include Ward Churchill of the University of Colorado, who made himself famous by declaring that the 9/11 victims of the Twin Towers were the equivalent of Nazi war criminals. Another is Columbia University's Nicholas De Genova, who during a 2003 anti-ROTC "teach in" declared, "I personally would like to see a million Mogadishus," in reference to the 18 American GIs killed there in 1993. If this isn't classic hate speech, I don't know what is.

Charles Moskos, the great American sociologist, who has specialized in studying the American military, probably summed it up best when he once observed that antimilitarism is the anti-Semitism of the American intelligentsia.



Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Related Articles


History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer
HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
STAY CONNECTED WITH US
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer! | StreamHistory.com
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2013 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy