Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link Weider History Group RSS feed Weider Subscriptions Historynet Home page

Letter from American History - December 2010

By American History editors 
Originally published on HistoryNet.com. Published Online: October 04, 2010 
Print Friendly
1 comment FONT +  FONT -

The mythologizing began soon after the last shots were fired in the Civil War. Rebel diehards who clung to the notion that the Confederacy was a noble "lost cause" argued that the South failed in its quest for independence only because of the overwhelming military resources of the Union. "What has long been overlooked is that the Confederacy fell victim not just to enemy armies, but also to the poverty of its proslavery, antidemocratic vision of the future and the determined resistance of its own people," says Stephanie McCurry, a professor of history at the University of Pennsylvania and the author of Confederate Reckoning: Power and Politics in the Civil War South. In our cover story, "The Confederacy: America's Worst Idea," McCurry argues that as we approach the 150th anniversary of secession this December, it's time to take an unromanticized look at the Confederate States of America and how it collapsed under the weight of its own moral and political contradictions.


One Response to “Letter from American History - December 2010”


  1. 1
    Ethan Ables says:

    In you opening paragraph you make an utterly baseless and ridculous statement that the CSU "collapsed under the weight of its own moral and political contradictions." The CSU collapsed under the weight of an invading army! An army who waged open warfare on civilian populations (shelling of Vicksburg to name one of many). The CSU never had a chance of winning a conventional war with the north and its leaders were terribly misguided to even attempt one. The war making ability of the north compared to the south at that time is like the New York Yankees vs The Bad News Bears.

    We don't know how the CSU would have developed because it was invaded and conquered.

    As to the point about slavery being the cause of the war; you must answer the question of whether or not the North would have invaded if the south if the south had freed the slaves at the same time as they -seperated from the union.



Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Related Articles


History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer
HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
STAY CONNECTED WITH US
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by Weider History, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
Weider History

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer! | StreamHistory.com
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2014 Weider History. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy