What We Learned From... The Fall of Singapore, 1942 | HistoryNet MENU

What We Learned From… The Fall of Singapore, 1942

By James Byrne
3/1/2017 • Military History Magazine

The supposedly impregnable British bastion of Singapore fell to the Japanese on Feb. 15, 1942, after the latter marched down the Malay Peninsula and executed an amphibious crossing of the Johore Strait. Commonwealth losses during the 69-day campaign exceeded 130,000 killed, wounded or captured, while the Japanese lost fewer than 10,000 casualties. Remarkably, the Japanese captured the “Gibraltar of the East” with a force that barely exceeded 30,000 troops.

On the morning of Dec. 8, 1941, Japanese forces made amphibious landings in Thailand and northern Malaya. The Japanese 25th Army and supporting units under General Tomoyuki Yamashita advanced rapidly down the peninsula against some 140,000 British and Commonwealth defenders.

Led by Lt. Gen. Arthur Percival, the Allied troops were generally road bound, poorly trained in jungle warfare, and lacking effective air or naval support. A faulty British assumption the terrain was unsuited to armor left them without tank support, while the Japanese employed some 200 armored vehicles. The loss of British aircraft and airfields, and the sinking of the Royal Navy capital ships Prince of Wales and Repulse by land-based Japanese aircraft, handed Yamashita air and sea superiority.

Trained for jungle warfare and highly mobile, the 25th Army outflanked the British with amphibious and infiltration operations. By New Year’s Day 1942 Allied forces had withdrawn to Singapore Island. The 54-day running battle cost the Japanese 4,000 casualties against some 25,000 British casualties.

Percival still had nearly two-thirds more troops available than Yamashita—and the mile-wide Johore Strait provided a buffer. But there were no fixed defenses on the island’s north coast, and the big guns the British did have lacked sufficient high-explosive rounds. Percival spread his forces along the 30-mile coast in a defensive scheme that lacked depth, flexibility and mutual support. Thinking the Japanese assault would come against the northeast coast, he stationed his strongest division in that sector, while the well-informed Japanese crossed the channel on February 8 and struck the northwest coast. Yamashita’s initial landing force of 13,000 men quickly overran the 3,000 Australian defenders in that sector, and another 10,000 Japanese followed within hours. After a series of uncoordinated counterattacks, Percival’s forces withdrew toward the south end of the island.

Instead of launching a major counterattack or resorting to urban combat (both of which Yamashita dreaded, given his dearth of men and supplies), Percival surrendered Singapore and his entire force on February 15 in what Winston Churchill described as the worst disaster in British military history.

 

Lessons:

Don’t assume away your enemy’s capabilities. Believing the Malaysian jungles to be largely impassable, the British were continually outflanked and overrun by the Japanese.

Intelligence and deception are significant force multipliers. The Japanese scoped out Singapore’s defenses, deceived Percival as to their landing zone and concentrated their forces to achieve overwhelming com- bat power at the point of attack.

The bigger force doesn’t necessarily win. The British surrendered to a force barely one-third their size. Their lack of air and naval support, inadequate training, low morale and poor senior leadership negated their overwhelming advantage in numbers.

You don’t need to kill the enemy to defeat him. The Japanese troops’ excellent training, tenacity, aggressive and innovative tactics, and superior mobility bewildered and demoralized British forces and rendered the leadership of Percival and his senior commanders weak and ineffective.

First published in Military History Magazine’s March 2017 issue.

, , , , ,



Sponsored Content: