Kamikaze Killer | HistoryNet MENU

Kamikaze Killer

By Donald Nijboer
2/2/2018 • Aviation History Magazine

The naval version of the Spitfire had its share of teething troubles, but by the end of World War II it had found its sea legs in the Pacific.

The ready room deep inside HMS Indefatigable offered little relief from the constant tropical heat in late March of 1945. The British carrier was a technical marvel for its day, but to the Royal Navy crew the overcrowded, un – ventilated flattop was more akin to a floating oven. The briefing had been quick and to the point: The Japanese had introduced a deadly new weapon that could alter the tactical situation in the Pacific, and it had to be defeated at all costs. With parachutes in hand, the pilots began the long climb to the flight deck, where six Supermarine Seafire L.IIIs had been readied for takeoff. Picket ships were tracking incoming bogies: The kamikazes had arrived. With throttles wide open, the Seafires rapidly rose to meet the threat.

The sleek interceptor’s excellent takeoff characteristics, speed and rate of climb made it uniquely qualified to deal with the Japanese suicide planes. No longer a second cousin to American carrier fighters, the Seafire would prove to be one of the best pure carrier interceptors of the war.

The Seafire took the reputation of its land-based forebear, the Supermarine Spitfire, to sea as an interceptor par excellence. Such a specialized role was unique to the Royal Navy; the United States and Japanese navies expected more range and versatility from their carrier fighters. After a resurgent British fleet returned to the Pacific in 1945, however, and kamikazes began hurling themselves at its carriers, the Seafire truly came into its own.

When Reginald Mitchell first designed the Spitfire, he never expected it to be used as a Fleet Air Arm fighter. Even a cursory look at the Spitfire reveals why: Its narrow-track landing gear was short and weak in comparison to most purpose-built shipboard fighters, the view forward from the cockpit was extremely poor, and its small size did not allow for an increase in internal fuel to extend range.

The Spitfire had been designed as a fast, maneuverable short-range interceptor, in – tended for operating from established airfields and supported by an abundance of spares and maintenance personnel. Re – vamped as the Seafire, it was adapted to fulfill a role for which it was never intended, flying from carrier decks and ill-equipped landing strips. Consequently, much of what the new Seafire was expected to do was beyond its capabilities, especially at the outset. But later, in the hands of a cadre of well-trained pilots, it outshone other carrier fighters in an interceptor role more suited to its design.

At the start of World War II, Britain’s Fleet Air Arm was in a sorry state. Of its 232 operational aircraft, the majority (140) were archaic Fairey Swordfish biplane torpedo bombers (though ironically they would chalk up an impressive combat record). The only modern aircraft the Fleet Air Arm possessed were 30 Blackburn Skuas. Designed as a fighter/dive bomber, the monoplane Skua fulfilled neither role well. With a top speed of about 225 mph, it was no match for more advanced fighters such as the Mitsubishi A6M2 Zero and Messerschmitt Me-109E, and it was a poor dive bomber to boot. Early Royal Navy operations during the invasion of Norway and subsequent actions in the Mediterranean against the Italians drove home the fact that the Fleet Air Arm was not capable of engaging existing Luftwaffe fighters—or bombers, for that matter.

After the Spitfire proved itself during the Battle of Britain, the Admiralty demanded a navalized version. Actually, as early as November 1939, a Royal Navy pilot had test-flown a Spitfire to investigate its suitability for naval operations, and the previous month Supermarine had tested a Spitfire equipped with an “A-frame” arrestor hook. That relatively casual experimentation turned serious in the autumn of 1941 when the Admiralty received the go-ahead to procure “Sea Spitfires.” It requested 400 aircraft, but the Air Ministry offered only 250.

During Christmas week of 1941, Lt. Cmdr. H.P. Bramwell piloted a Spitfire Mk. VB equipped with an arrestor hook and slinging lugs, conducting initial deck suitability trials aboard HMS Illustrious. In the course of his tests, he made 12 deck landings, took off seven times and was launched by catapult four times. Further successful carrier trials took place in March and April 1942, all flown by experienced carrier pilots aboard a specially prepared ship. As such, the tests gave little insight into the problems that would dog the Seafire under less favorable conditions.

Flying from and landing on a ship is an extremely difficult exercise, and carrier operations are notoriously tough on airplanes. Taking off and landing a docile aircraft on an aircraft carrier in ideal conditions is relatively straightforward. It’s when you add a pitching deck, gusting winds, poor visibility, pilot fatigue and inexperience, and high landing speeds that the real trouble begins. During World War II more carrier aircraft were lost due to accidents, poor navigation and fuel starvation than to enemy action. Add the high-performance Seafire to the mix and the results were predictable.

The first Seafires to be delivered were actually 48 existing Spitfire Mk. VBs that had been modified for shipboard use. Most of them were assigned to the Air Service Training program. The conversion of the Spitfire VB into the Seafire IB and the VC into the Seafire IIC was fairly simple. A 6-foot-long hydraulically damped arrestor hook, catapult spools and reinforced slinging lugs on each side of the fuselage were installed, and naval avionics added. The plane’s empty weight rose just 5 percent, and the drag caused by the new hook and slinging lugs reduced maximum speed by only 5 to 6 mph.

But while the Seafire Mk. IB had been a straight conversion of the VB airframe, the Seafire Mk. IIC and L.IIC that followed were built as naval fighters from the ground up. The Mk. III was the first Seafire with manually folding wings and a Merlin 55 engine. Built in three versions—fighter (F.III), low-altitude fighter (L.III) and low-altitude reconnaissance variant (LR.III)—it was destined to be produced in the greatest numbers.

The Seafire made its combat debut during Operation Torch, the invasion of North Africa, beginning on November 8, 1942. Five squadrons of Seafires participated, destroying five Vichy French aircraft, damaging three others and destroying another four on the ground. Twenty-one Seafires were lost, although only three to enemy action. These operational losses were due to the extremely poor visibility in thick haze on the first day of the invasion. Seafires were not the only ones to suffer; five out of six Sea Hurricanes were lost in one mission due to the poor atmospheric conditions. It was an inauspicious start, but what followed sealed the Seafire’s fate.

The carrier operations surrounding the amphibious assault on Salerno, Italy, served to define the Seafire’s reputation. After the invasion and capture of Sicily in August 1943, the Allies had quickly established a beachhead at Calabria on the “toe” of Italy on September 3. In hopes of avoiding a prolonged fight up the narrow peninsula, the U.S. Fifth Army launched Operation Avalanche, an am – phibious assault in the Bay of Salerno, on September 9. Seven carriers (five of which were escort carriers) with 121 Seafires were tasked with low and medium air defense of the northern beachhead until, it was hoped, the airfield at Montecorvino could be put into operation on the second day.

On D-day the Luftwaffe reacted swiftly and vigorously. At first light a half dozen Junkers Ju-88s were intercepted and forced to drop their bombs and turn away. This was followed by mostly low-level, high-speed hit-and-run raids by Focke Wulf Fw-190 and Messerschmitt Me-109 fighter-bombers.

D-plus-1 was the Seafires’ most successful day of operations. More than 40 enemy aircraft were forced to turn back, but deck landing accidents began to take a heavy toll. At dawn on D-plus-2 only 39 Seafires were available for operations. Still, they managed to fly 160 sorties, an amazing utilization of aircraft.

While the landings at Salerno were ultimately successful, they saddled the Seafire with an unenviable reputation. Statistically speaking, the numbers painted a grim picture. Although only two Seafires were lost in combat, just two enemy aircraft had been shot down. Worse, 42 Seafires had been lost or had to be written off due to accidents. For every ninth sortie flown, a Seafire was lost or seriously damaged—most often when propellers struck the deck.

The major reasons for the Seafire’s high attrition rate were poor operating conditions and pilot inexperience. Many of the fliers had transferred from the fleet carrier Indomitable to an escort carrier, and they now had to deal with a flight deck that was 30 percent smaller and a ship that was 10 knots slower. Add the lack of wind (which increased approach speeds by 10 or 15 knots, causing undue strain on hook, undercarriage, pilots and batsman), and you had a recipe for disaster. Furthermore, planners forced the carriers to operate in a restrictive “box” that was far too small and too close to shore for comfortable operations, even in good wind conditions.

Under these conditions it’s easy to see why the Seafire’s attrition rate was so high, but in terms of the sortie rate per serviceable aircraft, it did exceptionally well. At a time when most naval airplanes flew no more than two sorties in a day, the Seafire force went from 2.5 to 4.1 sorties per serviceable aircraft. Although they shot down few enemy planes, the Seafires did achieve their ultimate objective: They protected the fleet. Enemy raiders were forced to turn back, many jettisoned their bombs early and those that got close bombed wildly and raced for home. It was an admirable performance for an airplane never designed for such a grueling task.

Once bloodied in battle, the Sea – fire proved to be a competent fighter. Its major deficiencies, revealed during Operations Torch and Avalanche, were its low-level speed and pitiful endurance. But these would be rectified with the L.III model and the addition of 45- and 90-gallon slipper tanks. Training problems were also addressed.

By the time Seafires were operating in the Pacific, late in 1944, their reputation had begun to improve. With increased fuel capacity, they were able to fly offensive strikes as far as 195 miles from their ships. In the last operations of the war, the success of the two Sea – fire wings (88 aircraft) aboard Inde fatigable and Implacable came as a surprise to all but the pilots themselves. Striking targets on the Japanese Home Islands between July 17 and August 15, 1945, Seafires of Nos. 801, 880, 887 and 894 squadrons amassed an impressive record: 1,186 sorties flown, comprising 705 combat air patrol, 324 fighter sweep and 157 antishipping missions. In all, those operations expended 43,600 rounds of 20mm and 169,270 rounds of .303-inch ammunition. A total of 87 enemy aircraft were damaged or destroyed on the ground, and 11 in the air. The toll on enemy shipping was extensive: 3,700 tons sunk, 1,615 tons probably sunk and 24,700 tons damaged.

Seafire losses were slight, with only eight downed by flak and one by fighters, and six pilots killed. Deck landing accidents ac – counted for a further 20 aircraft, with seven damaged beyond local repair. Surprisingly, losses from all causes were lower than those experienced by the two Vought F4U Corsair wings flying similar missions.

It took a while, but in the closing weeks of the war the Seafire proved itself a capable carrier plane. From any perspective, it was not an ideal naval aircraft, but properly equipped and operated by well-trained pilots and maintenance personnel, it gained respect – ability undreamed of when it first appeared on a carrier deck.

How did the Seafire stack up against its carrier-borne contemporaries? WWII naval fighters had to perform a variety of tasks. Interception was their primary role, but other jobs included long-range escort, ground attack, reconnaissance, fighter sweeps, dive-bombing and spotting for bombardment by surface ships.

To fulfill these many roles, the carrier-borne fighter must possess three attributes: 1. power, performance and armament equal to or better than land-based interceptors and other naval fighters; 2. the ability to escort strike aircraft or remain on patrol for extended periods of time; 3. rugged structure, good deck landing characteristics and safe deck handling under all conditions. These requirements were more an ideal than an attainable goal. Trade-offs were often necessary in order for an aircraft to enter service. Only two WWII naval fighters possessed all three virtues at the time of their introduction: the A6M2 Zero and Grumman F6F-3 Hellcat.

From October 1942 until August 1943, the Seafire held the crown as the fastest carrier fighter afloat, eclipsed only by the introduction of the A6M5 and F6F-3. While its low- to medium-level performance was respectable, its rate of climb and acceleration were remarkable. The L.IIC climbed at nearly 3,500 feet per minute up to 10,000 feet—some 1,500 feet per minute better than the Hellcat or Corsair, and 1,000 feet per minute better than the Me-109G, Fw-190A or A6M5. For sheer acceleration the Seafire had no peer. In 1945 it was still the fastest and steepest climbing Allied naval interceptor. That turned out to be of great tactical value because once targets had been identified on radar, the Seafire required less distance and time to reach any given altitude.

The Seafire’s armament of two 20mm Hispano cannons and four .303-inch Browning machines guns remained un changed throughout the war. That configuration proved adequate, but there is reason to believe the Seafire/Spitfire was not a particularly good weapons platform. The Seafire was a light fighter, which meant that engine vibration and propeller torque interacted with structural flexing to make precise sighting of the guns difficult, especially at ranges beyond 200 yards. The Seafire L.IIC and L.III were cleared to carry a 500-pound bomb, though only two Seafire wings actually undertook bombing operations during the war.

Designed as a short-range point defense interceptor, the Spitfire was a poor candidate for the role of general-purpose naval fighter. Its internal fuel amounted to just 85 imperial gallons. Slipper tanks of 30 and 45 gallons were quickly introduced, with the 45-gallon version ready for the Seafire’s first combat operation. The 45-gallon tank gave it two-hour endurance with a radius of action of 140 miles. It wasn’t until the summer of 1945 that the Seafire’s short sea legs were significantly extended. Fitted with a 90-gallon slipper tank, Seafires could carry out offensive sweeps of up to 195 miles or stay on patrol for three hours or more.

The deck landing and handling qualities of the Seafire were, to put it kindly, not good. As a land-based interceptor, its landing technique called for long runways and a fairly fast approach speed down a 2-degree glide path, followed by a last-second flare. Carrier deck landings required a totally different technique, one that was foreign to the finely balanced Seafire. A constant-speed and constant-attitude approach was required in order to engage the arrestor wire in a safe, correct manner. The Seafire’s approach speed of between 74 and 80 mph (74 mph was just 7 mph above the “brochure stall”) left little room for error. Add the Seafire’s narrow-track undercarriage, and accidents should not have been unexpected.

Despite its many shortcomings, the Seafire achieved a modest degree of success. At war’s end 12 Seafire squadrons were in frontline carrier service. During air combat operations, they destroyed 37 enemy aircraft (including 15 Zeros), probably destroyed another two and damaged 25, for the loss of eight Seafires in air-to-air engagements.

Though it was adapted from a land-based interceptor and therefore was never particularly well suited to carrier use, the Seafire served admirably, and any criticism of its performance should be viewed through that prism. In many ways what the Seafire accomplished was quite remarkable. Credit for its success should go to those who operated this fine fighter under arduous conditions.


Among several other aviation history books, Toronto-based writer Donald Nijboer is the author of Seafire vs. A6M Zero, which he recommends for further reading. Also try Super – marine Seafire, by Kev Darling, and Royal Navy Aces of World War 2, by Andrew Thomas.

Originally published in the January 2010 issue of Aviation History. To subscribe, click here

, , , , ,

Sponsored Content: