HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

John Brown’s Moonlight March

By Tim Rowland | America's Civil War  | 3 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

Historynet Image
Historynet Image

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to America's Civil War magazine

On a chill foggy autumn evening in 1859, abolitionist John Brown and a rough gang of 21 men with guns and pikes and revolt in their hearts quietly hiked five miles from a farm in Western Maryland to the federal armory in Harpers Ferry, Va. Their ambitions were outrageous: surprise the guards at the armory, capture wagonloads of rifles and then flee, distributing the guns among slaves. Brown hoped for nothing less than a full uprising of servant against master.

He had spent four months living on the farm simply trying to fit in. The hike to Harpers Ferry had become routine. A new beard and a shock of Lyle Lovett hair kept

locals from recognizing him as the devil who had massacred slave owners in Kansas three years before. Soon the disguise would be irrelevant. “Men, get on your arms,” he famously declared on the night of October 16, “we will proceed to the Ferry.”

Now, 150 years later, walking in Brown’s footsteps remains an eerily timeless experience. Roads that were dirt are now paved, the bridge Brown used to cross the Potomac River has been replaced, and buildings in Harpers Ferry throw off electric light. But most of the route remains pitch-black after sunset; trees that witnessed that night are still there, and woodstoves continue to scent the air.

Civil War buffs have been making this pilgrimage for better than three decades. In 1979—the 120th anniversary of John Brown’s raid—National Park Service historian Dennis Frye and 20 re-enactors, decked out in period clothing and shouldering period weapons, hiked from the Ken­nedy Farm in Washington County to the Harpers Ferry armory. They read from 1850s newspapers to get into character.

“We tried to transport ourselves back in time,” Frye said. “It was very respectful.”

Perhaps the most memorable part of the trek occurred midway, when an approaching car flashed its high beams and slowed. The lights belonged to a squad car from the Washington County Sheriff’s Department. Staying in character, the soldiers sauntered on—there were no squad cars in 1859. Once past, the deputy turned around and re-approached at the same slow speed, high beams blazing. As he neared, “I expected the red and blue lights to come on,” Frye said.

Instead, the deputy drew even with the procession, took one last gander, and then peeled out at full speed, apparently wanting no part of the apparition.

Unlike those earlier cultish marches, the hike planned for this fall’s 150th anniversary will be publicized and well attended. Organizers expect hundreds of enthusiasts.

The path is mostly downhill to the Potomac and flat after that, as the road hugs the riverbank on its way downstream to the confluence with the Shenandoah River. The relative ease of the hike will not diminish the experience. “It’s still sparsely settled,” Frye said, “and still quite dark”—as dark as when John Brown hitched up his team, shouted words of encouragement and set off on a mission to change the world.

“It’s been debated over the last century and a half when the Civil War began,” Frye said. “The conventional wisdom says Fort Sumter. I disagree with that. John Brown invoked a fear that communities had not experienced before.”

Brown intended to raid the federal armory and use the weapons to establish a series of forts where fleeing slaves could join his army of marauders. At a time when the going rate for an 18-year-old male slave was $1,200, a plantation that lost most of its slaves would be equivalent to a modern farm stripped of all its tractors, harvesters, plows and irrigation equipment. Further, Brown hoped that a slave rebellion in the midst of the harvest season would damage plantations even more.

Pages: 1 2 3
HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 3 Comments to “John Brown’s Moonlight March”

  2. Very interesting article that taght me a lot I didn’t know. One suggestion, though: It would be good to provide a link for people to get more information about the 150-year anniversary hike the article mentions. That sounds like something I’d like to do and hotlinks in an article are always appreciated.

    By Chris on Aug 24, 2009 at 9:22 pm

  3. I would say that the seeds of the War Between the States (Civil War is such an oxymoron) were sown in 1619 when the first slaves were brought to this country so that they festered for 242 years!!! Therefore, this conflict basically, essentially and fundamentally began when those slaves arrived here. You would have thought that after 4 years of slaughter the issue would have been resolved. Regrettably, some issues linger even after 144 years.

    By John Jones on Sep 1, 2009 at 2:37 pm

  4. I posed the question about John Brown allowing the train to pass after stopping it to my U. S. History students a few years back (college age).

    One, a mature man who worked in a sports and gun shop, said: “John Brown was waiting for someone. If it wasn’t the slaves (because they were outnumbered 10 to 1 in the local area near Harpers Ferry), who was it?”

    The answer came several times in documentation about Brown’s friends who were outside the area, but close by. One, James Redpath, spent the night in a hotel in Baltimore on October 15 after his friend Francis Meriam came in to join Brown, and found the raid was ready to go. They expected it a week later.

    My theory is that Brown wanted word to spread about the raid so his friends in conspiracy with him could hear that it had begun, and take action. They didn’t.

    He had no other way but the train to spread the word. Even so, the engineer refused to leave Harpers Ferry until daylight. He was afraid they had sabatoged the bridge. John Brown obliged him by sending men to walk across the bridge ahead of the train at daylight to prove it was safe.

    I too believe that John Brown should have left immediately with the arms when he took Harpers Ferry. His staying too long was caused by his single-mindedness and desire to communicate his mission and convert slaveholders. They didn’t.

    By Jean Libby on Sep 26, 2009 at 7:46 pm

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

OPINION POLL

Which of these World War I aircraft was the best fighter plane?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Get Our Daily HistoryNet Email
 
 


What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us|Advertise With Us|Subscription Help