HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

John Singleton Mosby's Revenge

Civil War Times  | Single Page  | 3 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

A ragged line of Union soldiers stood in a field along Goose Creek in Rectortown, Virginia, on November 6, 1864. They jostled, chatted and joked with each other, pleased to be outdoors on a brisk autumn day. As prisoners of war these 27 Yankees had been confined to a brick store building in the village, waiting to be taken south to a Confederate prison camp. Little did they know that nearly a fourth of them were marked to settle a blood debt — minor characters in a major drama of reckoning between Lieutenant Colonel John Singleton Mosby and Brigadier General George Armstrong Custer.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to Civil War Times magazine

A few minutes before noon their captors — members of the 43rd Battalion of Virginia Cavalry, better known to history as Mosby's Rangers — led the Federals from the store to a gentle slope above the creek. It was likely Ranger Sgt. Maj. Guy Broadwater who addressed the prisoners. Seven Rangers had been executed by the prisoners' Union comrades, Broadwater informed the group, and an equal number of them would share a similar fate. The words stunned and silenced the Northerners. A hat with 27 slips of paper, he explained, would be passed along the line, and each man must draw one slip. Seven of the pieces had been marked, and if a Yankee drew one of them, he was to be executed. A Ranger handed the hat to the first soldier.

Mosby, commander of the battalion, stayed in the village, unwilling to watch as his orders were carried out. Events during the past three months had forced Mosby to act. He did so reluctantly, or as he explained later: "I determined to demand and enforce every belligerent right to which the soldiers of a great military power were entitled by the laws of war. But I resolved to do it in the most humane manner, and in a calm, judicial spirit."

Mosby had been conducting partisan operations since January 1863. An opponent of secession and a reluctant soldier, he had adapted to military life with surprising ease as a member of the 1st Virginia Cavalry. Restless by nature, Mosby thrived on scouting and picket duty. In time he became one of Maj. Gen. J.E.B. Stuart's most trusted scouts. On December 30, 1862, Stuart gave Mosby permission to conduct forays against enemy detachments, camps and wagon trains in northern Virginia during the winter months. Within weeks Mosby's value as a partisan became evident. The climax came when he daringly captured Union Brig. Gen. Edwin Stoughton at Fairfax Court House on March 9, 1863.

The Stoughton capture brought Mosby fame both in the South and in the North. Young volunteers hurried to join the growing command. Mosby chose as a base the counties of Fauquier and Loudoun, where civilians enthusiastically sheltered, fed and concealed the Rangers. The local folks also alerted the partisans to the arrival of Federal units in the region, devising various warning signals. The area became known as "Mosby's Confederacy," and Mosby, an antebellum lawyer, served as its supreme military and civil authority.

The Rangers' mission was, as he stated it, "to weaken the armies invading Virginia by harassing their rear." Scouts constantly searched for targets. When one of them found an opportunity to strike, Mosby gathered his men at a prearranged rendezvous. With outriders ringing the column, the Rangers descended upon supply wagons, an enemy outpost, a railroad train or a body of Federal troops. The Confederates struck swiftly, with each man firing a brace of revolvers. "A small force moving with celerity and threatening many points on a line can neutralize a hundred times its own number," asserted Mosby.

On June 10, 1863, at Rector's Cross Roads (modern-day Atoka), Mosby organized his command into Company A, 43rd Battalion of Virginia Cavalry. He selected each officer personally while allowing the men to affirm his choices with a vote. Reserved and even taciturn, Mosby imposed his will and discipline upon youthful hotheads serving under him. If a member dared to cross him or behave badly with the civilians, Mosby banished him to the Confederate Army. He forged a matchless partisan command, earning official praise from Stuart and General Robert E. Lee for its exploits and timely gathering of critical intelligence.

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Tags: , , ,

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 3 Comments to “John Singleton Mosby's Revenge”

  2. Sorry to say, this is the most "mixed up" recounting of "history" that I have ever read – and I've read some doozies!

    You have confused Confederate "LIEUTENANT"* John Mosby's capture of young Union Brigadier General Edwin Stoughton sleeping in the middle of the night in the middle of his army at Fairfax Courthouse on March 8th and 9th, 1863 (no one was killed or even a shot fired, but there were 38 prisoners and some 68 horses taken by Mosby and his 29 men) with the retaliation LT. COLONEL John Mosby took against the commands of Gen. Custer and Col Powell for the hanging and shooting of seven of his men at Front Royal (and elsewhere) in 1864! (*Mosby actually had no rank at the time though he wore a Captain's uniform when he captured Stoughton and had for several months held the rank of lieutenant in the First Virginia Cavalry under Col. William "Grumble" Jones.)

    By the time Mosby had three men hanged and four shot (the three hanged men died, but the four others did not – one escaped and the others survived their wounds), Edwin Stoughton had long since left the army in disgrace for being taken prisoner in his nightshirt. After the retaliation, Mosby sent a letter to General Philip Sheridan and told him that after his men had been murdered, over SEVEN HUNDRED Union prisoners had passed through his hands, but he had singled out men from the commands of the officers that he held responsible for the murders. He also told Sheridan that there would be no more hangings and shootings unless the Yankees continued to treat his men as outlaws; the murder of Mosby's men ceased from that day.

    Really, this information is well known and EXTREMELY well publicized. There is no excuse for confusing these two incidents which took place over a year apart and under very different circumstances. Please correct your present posting. Thank you.

    By Valerie Protopapas on Mar 21, 2009 at 10:20 pm

  3. The first time I read this, much of the text was missing and the only conclusion that could be drawn was as I commented above. For some reason, the SECOND time I accessed the site, the correct information was available. Ah technology!

    The author does not state what I concluded above and I withdraw that critique. He is indeed correct about Mosby and Custer (or at least Mosby THOUGHT it was Custer – others have concluded differently). I apologize for the confusion – but given the text I had to go by, I was confused!

    By Valerie Protopapas on Mar 25, 2009 at 2:08 pm

  4. Please note that my Great-great-great Grandfather's last name was Thomson…Frances Edward Thomson (Ned). There is no "p" in his last name.

    By Lynn Marie Hilleary on Feb 1, 2010 at 6:16 pm

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

If the Tirpitz and the Bismarck could have operated together, would it have made much difference in the naval war of the Atlantic?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Get Our Daily HistoryNet Email
 
 


What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us|Advertise With Us|Subscription Help