| |

Interview With World War II German Officer Siegfried Knappe| World War II | 8 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post Berlin was a stout place for a fight. It was large, modern and well-planned, which had allowed it to remain less damaged than other German cities, even though it had been heavily bombed. Still, by 1945, approximately 25 percent of Berlin had been destroyed by air raids, but its essential services had never been overwhelmed. Because of its sturdy construction, a great effort would be required to capture the capital city. Subscribe Today
The same factors that made Berlin so bomb-resistant also helped it resist ground attack. Throughout the city, large apartment buildings stood on strong, deep cellars. Wide boulevards and avenues at regular intervals served as firebreaks and would also serve as killing zones against Soviet tanks and infantry. Natural obstacles within the city made it even more defensible. The Spree River cut from the northwest part of the city through its center to the southeast. Berlin’s southern approaches were guarded by the Teltow Canal. The center of the city, the heart of the capital, lay in a ‘V’ surrounded by the Spree River and the Landwehr Canal.
Many of the city’s defenders were fighting for survival in the hope that they could delay the Soviets long enough for the Western armies to occupy more of Germany and, hopefully, Berlin. That was a hope that would never be realized, however. Berlin was defended by the LVI Panzer Corps under General Karl Weidling. At the start of the Soviet offensive, the LVI Panzer Corps was still not fully manned and consisted of only two divisions, the recently formed Muncheberg Division and the 20th SS Panzer Division, whose strength had been severely depleted during futile counterattacks at Kustrin. Eventually, the corps would consist of five divisions. When it fell back into Berlin, it lost contact with one division, so the last battle was fought with four divisions, as well as those forces already in the city–a total of 60,000 men and 50 to 60 tanks.
The Soviet armies were well-trained and well-equipped. Their plan was to surround and capture the city on the sixth day of the offensive. By the 11th day, the Red Army was at the Elbe River. Contrary to the Soviet plan, Berlin did not surrender until May 2, a full 17 days after the offensive began. The American and Soviet troops first met on April 25 at the Elbe River, 10 days after the offensive began.
While it is difficult to say exactly how many Soviet soldiers actually participated in the assault on Berlin, the Berlin Medal was awarded to nearly 1,082,000 troops. That means the Soviet forces had more than 10 times the men the Germans had during the fight for the city itself. Even so, it took the Red Army from April 21, when it first reached the city, until May 2 to capture Berlin–a total of 12 days.
The length of time required to capture the city can be explained by the desperate German resistance, the difficulties involved in street combat and the Soviet soldiers’ knowledge that the war was all but over. Soldiers have no desire to die, and it is difficult to motivate them to take extra chances if they feel that their deaths would be meaningless. The Soviet soldier had nothing to gain or prove by dying for the motherland so late in the war. Even so, losses among the three Red Army fronts involved in the operation from April 16 to May 8 totaled more than 300,000 men–over 10 percent of their total strength.
One German soldier who fought during the battle for Berlin was Siegfried Knappe. At the time of the battle, he was a major and the operations officer of the LVI Panzer Corps. Knappe, along with Ted Brusaw, has recently written Soldat, a book on his experiences in the German army from 1936 to 1949.
WWII: How were the defenses of Berlin laid out?
Knappe: The defenses of the city consisted of three rings with nine sectors. The outer ring was about 60 miles in circumference and ran around the outskirts of the city. It mainly consisted of partially dug trenches and hastily emplaced roadblocks. The middle ring was about 25 miles in circumference and made use of already existing obstacles such as the S-Bahn [surface railway] and solidly built houses. The inner ring was the center of the city and consisted of massive government buildings. In addition, there were six bombproof flak towers. Eight of the sectors, labeled A through H, radiated in a pie shape through all three defensive rings. The ninth, Z, was located in the center of the city. Sector Z had its own defensive force consisting of Hitler’s SS guard units. Beyond the flak units there were no regular army units to speak of in Berlin until we arrived. Pages: 1 2 3 4Tags: 20th - 21st Century, Historical Conflicts, World War II
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
8 Comments to “Interview With World War II German Officer Siegfried Knappe”
I recently finished reading “Soldat”, and it was an interesting account from the ‘other side’. This interview helped flesh out some of the final details from the book, it would be great to hear more from Herr Knappe.
By SVB on Aug 14, 2008 at 12:56 pm
Knappe, We are proud of You,
heil Hitler
By Mandar Deshpande on Aug 17, 2008 at 3:05 am
I recently read Mr. Knappe’s most interesting book about his service in the Heer. I also went to Berlin this past year and saw many of the areas he referred to in his book. In contrast to Herr Deshpane’s comment about Hitler, Knappe didn’t seem to like him, nor did most general staff officers. Herr Deshpande rightly should be proud of Knappe’s service to Germany, but he ended up an American, and not a closet Nazi like Herr Deshpande; to hell with Hitler, rather than heil!
By William Davis on Oct 14, 2008 at 5:11 pm
When evil runs rampant bad things happen to good people. Mr.
Knappe was extraordinarily lucky to survive .
By allen monday on Nov 1, 2008 at 2:32 pm
He lives in my town. German officer shown in PBS special 1 or 2 years ago. How do I view that Hitler/Nazi show-from summer one & half years back-summer of 2007??
call shane 260-493-6043
By shane on Dec 21, 2008 at 5:07 pm
I just finished the book Soldat and found it to be outstanding!! As a German Canadian who’s grandparents and great uncles also fought in WWII for Germany I appreciated the books detail and was happily surprised at how many details were similar to my own grandfather’s tales… Thankyou for putting your memoirs down into type
By David on Feb 22, 2009 at 5:58 pm
I bought this book on a lead from my father when he told me that the old guy that lived acroos the street was an ex-german officer during WWII. Being a military history buff, i read the book and wow! a very interesting look into the othersides perspective of war.
By ddoyle on Mar 19, 2009 at 3:17 pm
I had the pleasure of having Siegfried to my house for dinner on the mid 70’s in CA. At that time he was working for NCR out of Dayton, Ohio. I knew nothing about his background but after a bottle or two of wine the discussion came to his experiences in the war. To say that it was a memorable experience would be a gross understatement.
By Lou on Jun 24, 2009 at 6:46 pm