General Tomoyuki Yamashita | HistoryNet MENU

General Tomoyuki Yamashita

By Nathaniel R. Helms
6/12/2006 • Battle of Manila, World War II

In measured steps a column of five men enters the screened enclosure concealing the hangman’s noose. The officer in command gives a terse order, and the somber group halts. More commands are given, and the execution detail moves toward the brightly lit gallows.

One man catches all eyes, the central figure whose hands are bound in front as he approaches the gallows steps. He is the first of three Japanese soldiers sentenced to die this morning. The condemned man is dressed in the plain garb of a private soldier, stripped of ‘decorations and other appurtenances signifying membership in the military profession,’ by personal order of General of the U.S. Army Douglas MacArthur. At his side is a Buddhist priest.

Waiting at the top of the gallows is Lieutenant Charles Raroad, a military police officer charged with executing the condemned. ‘The stage was set under a tropical star-studded sky,’ Raroad wrote just hours later. ‘The stars, usually so warm and friendly, seem gradually to lose their warmth and assume the air of dignified judges turned stern witness.’

At the top of the gallows stairs the executioner steps aside to let pass 61-year-old Lt. Gen. Tomoyuki Yamashita. Nothing about him suggests he is the same ‘Tiger of Malaya’ whose troops rampaged through the South Pacific early in the war. Raroad later called him a ‘heavy, squat, yellow-visaged figure that seemed calm and stoic about his impending doom.’

Twelve days before this day of execution, MacArthur denied the Japanese general’s final appeal. ‘It is not easy for me to pass penal judgment upon a defeated adversary in a major campaign,’ MacArthur wrote in his terse, four-paragraph decision. ‘I have reviewed the proceedings in vain search for some mitigating circumstance on his behalf. I can find none.’ And so now Raroad prepares Yamashita’s passage, working with quick, confident movements. First Raroad places leather straps around Yamashita’s arms and legs, followed by a black hood over his head. Finally, Raroad drops the noose around Yamashita’s thick neck, ‘the bulging knot pulled taut under the left ear.’

Now the stillness is interrupted, ‘hardly broken,’ Raroad later wrote, by the high-pitched chant of the Buddhist priest who stands in front of the trussed figure. The priest’s words gradually fade as Raroad prepares to speak. He pauses and then asks, ‘Have you any last words to say?’

There is a brief, muffled reply from Yamashita: ‘I will pray for the Japanese emperor and the emperor’s family, and national prosperity. Dear father and mother I am going to your side. Please educate well my children.’ Then, the condemned man nods, and Raroad looks around a final time to, as he later wrote, ‘gather strength and control.’ The knife blade in Raroad’s hand flashes momentarily in the bright, yellow light as he quickly draws it down across the counterweight holding the rope. Immediately the silence is shattered by one rasping shriek as the retaining bolts of the trap door pull free. The figure standing before Raroad plummets down, only to be arrested with a sharp jerk after a 6-foot fall. It is 3:02 a.m., February 23, 1946, at the Philippine Detention and Rehabilitation Center near Manila, and the Tiger of Malaya is dead.

‘The General died before dawn,’ proclaimed the next day’s Pacifican, as the Pacific Stars & Stripes was called in the Western Pacific. ‘Executioner Lieutenant Charles Raroad sent Yamashita to join his ancestors.’

It was an ignominious end for one of Japan’s greatest soldiers. Yamashita began his military career in 1916, after graduating with honors from the Japanese War College. During the interwar years he served in many influential posts in the army, including staff, command and attaché duties in Switzerland, Germany and Austria. In 1937 he was posted to Korea, where he commanded an infantry brigade.

By 1941, Yamashita was the commanding general of the Twenty-Fifth Army. His plans for taking Singapore were already underway. On December 8, 1941, he struck, marching his troops for nine weeks through supposedly impenetrable jungle to pounce on Great Britain’s ‘Gibraltar of the East.’ On February 15, 1942, Yamashita prevailed, when British Lt. Gen. Sir Arthur Percival and 130,000 Empire troops surrendered. It was the largest surrender in British history.

Five months later, Yamashita was transferred to the backwaters of Manchuria, the victim of Prime Minister Hideki Tojo’s jealousy and Yamashita’s often-voiced dislike of the warlord’s policies. For the next two years that is where Yamashita stayed, watching his command dwindle away as his soldiers were called to fight in more active theaters. Then, in the fall of 1944, when the Pacific War had reached its zenith, Yamashita received orders to command the defense of the Philippines. It would be his final call to destiny.

By then the Allies had swept the emperor’s soldiers away from most of their fanatically defended island bastions. Yamashita already knew that the Philippines were next on the Allied list for liberation. He also knew that the Philippines were an absolutely vital link in the shrinking supply lines of Japan’s crumbling empire. Yamashita had no illusions about his chances for success. At best he hoped to deprive the Allies of the Philippines as a forward operating area for as long as possible. He reached Manila on October 5, 1944, two weeks before his last battle would begin.

Meanwhile, MacArthur’s Southwest Pacific area forces were on board hundreds of troopships bound for the Philippines. On October 20, Lt. Gen. Walter Krueger’s Sixth Army stormed ashore almost unopposed on the east coast of Leyte. As soon as Yamashita learned of the invasion, he reluctantly ordered troops stationed on Luzon to reinforce Leyte’s outnumbered garrison. More troops were brought in from Korea and Manchuria. By November, the Japanese had 45,000 soldiers facing MacArthur and more were on the way. Eventually, 75,000 Japanese soldiers would be thrown into the fight on Leyte.

The battle raged for more than two months. Before it concluded in late December, Yamashita had lost 60,000 soldiers killed. U.S. Army casualties were 3,500 killed and 12,000 wounded. MacArthur called the battle for Leyte ‘perhaps the greatest defeat in the annals of the Japanese army.’ Still ahead, however, were the grim battles for Luzon and the Philippine capital, Manila, the prewar ‘Pearl of the Orient’ and MacArthur’s adopted home.

The opening gambit of the battle for Luzon started on December 15, 1944, when MacArthur ordered troops ashore on the nearby island of Mindoro. MacArthur knew that if he attacked Luzon without overwhelming superiority the invasion would be a bloodier repeat of the 1942 Japanese conquest. To that end he needed airfields to gain air superiority and protected supply routes that avoided Luzon’s still dangerous air force.

Young Japanese kamikaze pilots already were crashing their planes onto the decks of Allied ships. The first American ship lost to the suicide planes had gone to the bottom on October 25, when planes from the hastily formed kamikaze squadron of Vice Adm. Takijito Onishi’s First Air Fleet sank the escort carrier St. Lô. In all, 16 ships would be sunk off the Philippines and another 80 damaged before the Americans gained total control of the air.

The invasion of Mindoro surprised Yamashita. He had anticipated that MacArthur would develop airfields farther south, thinking that it would take too long to build runways on the marshy ground of Mindoro. Within eight days of landing, however, American and Australian engineers had two fighter strips in operation. A week later they added a bomber base for Fifth Air Force medium bombers.

Within three weeks of landing on Mindoro, Allied aircraft were striking hard at Luzon. More than half the ships carrying supplies to Yamashita were sunk. Thousands of fresh troops drowned, and those that managed to get ashore had nothing to eat.

Yamashita was left with few options. The only offensive weapons he still possessed were the young pilots who were willing to fly one-way suicide strikes at MacArthur’s support ships, and their numbers were dwindling. The situation on the ground was even worse. On paper, Yamashita had 275,000 troops, but those numbers were deceptive. Many of his soldiers were survivors of other battles thrown together in ad hoc outfits of dubious value. Many more were service troops and second-rate line units.

Another 16,000 sailors and special landing-force troops of the 31st Naval Base Force were stationed around Manila under the command of Rear Adm. Sanji Iwabuchi. Although Iwabuchi was nominally under Yamashita’s command, in practice the fiery Bushido warrior chose to ignore orders from Yamashita that he did not like.

The plan Yamashita finally adopted for defending Luzon was simple. He would abandon Manila and its environs and head for the hills. Already resigned to losing eventually, Yamashita simply hoped to occupy as much of the island as possible to deny its use to MacArthur. He later claimed that he was already prepared to cede Manila to MacArthur when the Sixth Army struck. Meanwhile, Iwabuchi put his own simple plan into effect. Iwabuchi planned to defend Manila to the death.

On January 9, 1945, MacArthur finally mounted his invasion of Luzon. At two points on Lingayen Gulf, 110 miles north of Manila, 68,000 men from Krueger’s Sixth Army waded ashore. Two days later, Krueger established a secure beachhead and began forging inland. With I Corps on the left flank and XIV Corps in the van, Krueger headed for Manila.

For the rest of the month he piled on new divisions, until almost the entire Sixth Army was ashore. Throughout January, Krueger’s troops fought a series of tough actions that slowed their assault on Manila to a crawl. Some of the pressure on the Sixth Army’s front was relieved on January 31, when the 11th Airborne Division came ashore by boat at Nasugbu Bay, 55 miles southwest of Manila. But it was not until February 3, when the newly arrived 1st Cavalry Division drove 70 miles through thinly held Japanese lines to reach the eastern approaches to Manila, that the Sixth Army’s goal was in sight. The following day the 11th Airborne Division entered the city from the south to catch Iwabuchi’s sailors in a giant vise.

Remarkably, MacArthur was still hopeful that Manila could be taken without a serious fight. To that end he ordered his soldiers and airmen to use restraint when taking the city. MacArthur completely forbade the use of tactical airstrikes in the city, and he told his gunners to shoot sparingly. There were both philosophical and practical reasons for doing so, MacArthur told his generals.

First and most important, MacArthur said, Yamashita could not feed Manila’s 700,000 civilians. Second, if Yamashita allowed his army to be bottled up in Manila, he could not defend the rest of the island. Finally, MacArthur, for whatever reason, did not believe that Yamashita would order the city’s destruction.

Perhaps MacArthur believed that the dire warnings he had been broadcasting to Yamashita after landing at Leyte would give the Japanese general pause. In a broadcast initially read on October 4, 1944, and repeated many times during the ensuing campaign, MacArthur warned Yamashita that he would ‘hold the Japanese military authorities in the Philippines immediately liable for any harm’ to POWs, civilians and internees trapped in the Philippines.

By February 6, facing mounting casualties, MacArthur purged himself of his grand delusion and ordered his soldiers to use their artillery. He still forbade tactical bombing. Once the earlier prohibitions against using heavy artillery on important buildings was rescinded, the Sixth Army began applying its full might against the Japanese. As fighting raged from building to building and strongpoint to strongpoint, the battle slowly consumed the city.

Later, Yamashita protested that the naval troops and service units still in Manila were not supposed to be there. During his court-martial, Yamashita testified that even before MacArthur had invested Manila he had given orders for his troops to pull back into the mountains to the north and east. The bulk of the Japanese forces complied, he said, though some army service troops and almost the entire contingent of Iwabuchi’s naval force stayed behind.

The U.S. Army’s own reconstruction of the battle several years later somewhat supported Yamashita’s view. In fact many of the service troops in Manila were simply trapped there by MacArthur’s relentless attacks. But others, particularly Iwabuchi’s naval troops, had refused to leave. It was those die-hards who faced Krueger’s troops.

By February 23, the Sixth Army had forced most of Manila’s defenders into the Intramuros, the 150-acre ‘walled city,’ a three-square-mile area near Manila Bay, where many government buildings stood. The retreating Japanese left thousands of murdered and mutilated Filipino civilians in their wake. Holed up with them were 4,000 more civilians who could not escape.

When the Americans began the task of reducing Iwabuchi’s final stronghold, the slaughter was terrific. Still denied air power by MacArthur, the soldiers resorted to massive doses of artillery to give them the edge. Inside the walls of the old Spanish city, Japanese soldiers and sailors went on a vindictive rampage, burning and looting indiscriminately. When the last shot had been fired, Intramuros was razed to the ground, as were the stout government buildings where the Japanese had sought final refuge. Included in the destruction was MacArthur’s six-room penthouse above the Manila Hotel.

The carnage MacArthur witnessed was incredible. Almost all of Iwabuchi’s 16,000 troops, including their commander, were dead. More than 1,000 American soldiers were also killed, and another 5,500 were wounded. But the greatest toll was taken on Manila’s defenseless population. More than 100,000 souls, including most of those trapped in Intramuros, had been wiped out. Thousands more were wounded or missing.

The fall of Manila did not end the Philippine campaign. Yamashita was still to the north of Manila with the bulk of his remaining army, and there were many bitter campaigns ahead. For the remainder of the war, Yamashita’s soldiers fought a series of fierce delaying actions along Luzon’s Cordillera Mountains. It was not until the last day of the war that Yamashita stopped fighting. And then, on September 2, with nowhere else to go, Yamashita surrendered. ‘If I kill myself,’ the general explained,’someone else will have to take the blame.’ The blame was not long in coming. On October 8, 1945, five weeks after Japan unconditionally surrendered, Yamashita was arraigned before a military commission in Manila and charged with war crimes. MacArthur had drawn up the charges, appointed the military commission, and set the rules for the trial.

Yamashita was charged with failing to ‘discharge his duty as commander to control the operations of the members of his command’ between October 2, 1944, and September 2, 1945. In the same specification Yamashita was accused of ‘permitting them to commit brutal atrocities and other high crimes against the people of the United States and its allies and dependencies.’ The prescribed punishment was death. Yamashita’s defense was simple. He claimed he was not there. During his trial at the high commissioner’s residence in Manila, Yamashita testified that he had ordered his troops to leave Manila to the Allies. But because of the stranglehold MacArthur had placed around his garrisons in Manila, he was unable to make sure the orders were carried out.

Yamashita denied any involvement in the atrocities that took place in Manila. ‘I positively and categorically reaffirm that they were against my wishes and in direct contradiction to all my expressed orders,’ he told the court-martial panel. ‘They occurred at a time and place of which I had no knowledge whatsoever.’

It was to no avail. MacArthur had already made up his mind. Yamashita was defended by a battery of competent trial attorneys. His case was even appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. During the first week of January 1946, the high court listened to arguments from both sides. The defense claimed that Yamashita could not have received a fair trial under the mandates dictated by MacArthur. The prosecution argued that the destruction of Manila by Japanese troops under Yamashita’s command was all the evidence needed to convict him. In a 7­2 decision, the high court ruled Yamashita’s conviction and death sentence were just and fitting. The two dissenting justices called it ‘a legalized lynching.’

MacArthur would hear none of it. On February 11, 1946, he wrote: ‘This officer, of proven field merit, entrusted with high command involving authority adequate to responsibility, has failed this irrevocable standard; has failed his duty to his troops, to his country, to his enemy, to mankind; has failed utterly his soldier faith. The results are beyond challenge.’

On February 21, 1946, Lt. Gen. W.D. Styer, commander of the Western Pacific forces, ordered Colonel John H. Fonvielle, commanding officer of the Philippine Detention and Rehabilitation Center near Manila, to carry out MacArthur’s order. Two days later, Yamashita dropped through the gallows floor, unrepentant to the end. ‘Before my God I have told the truth,’ he announced through an interpreter when the sentence of execution was read. ‘I do not believe that I have sinned. I think that I–my soul–will live forever.’

Yamashita swung below the gallows for 25 minutes, swaying to and fro in the early morning breeze. Raroad, the executioner, remembered how the lights suddenly went out–because someone had thrown a circuit breaker–and how the taut rope stood out ‘evilly, connecting the crossbeam and the platform. ‘Yamashita, general in the Imperial Japanese Army and its commander of the Philippine Islands, had been hanged by the neck until dead.’



This article was written by Nathaniel R. Helms and originally appeared in the February 1996 issue of World War II magazine. For more great articles subscribe to World War II magazine today!

44 Responses to General Tomoyuki Yamashita

  1. Whose Justice says:

    Lt-Gen Yamashita did not have a fair trial.

    I do not condone Japan for attacking South East Asia, nor the atrocities which their troops , both officers and men, had committed against innocent civilians in those vanquished countries. As final conquerors and victors, the Americans had the perogative of bringing to justice any enemysoldiers or civilians who had commited war crimes against humanity.

    However, the manner in which the vanquished Japanese generals, especially Yamashita, were put to trial was questionable. Firstly it was the speed – with so many charges read against him the defence team was given only 3 weeks to put up his defence. Secondly, a lot of evidence against him were borne by both “hearsay” (if he had been tried under today’s laws and away from a combat zone I believed he would have a fairer trial) and circumstantial evidences. Thirdly, General MacArthur had already made up his mind on the guilt of Yamashita before the trial as most of the terms of references for his trial seem to suggest.

    Some pertinent points raise by Yamashita in his defence were cast aside by most of the tribunal judges except for Justice Murphy and one other dissenting judge, both of whom were correct to point out that Yamashita’s guilty was questionable, i.e. reasonable doubts existed. How guilty can a commander be if after issuing orders for his forces to retreat (pull out of Manila) and such orders being not acted upon by dissenting unit commanders who chose to stay behind and exacting their last act of vengeance on the filipino population trapped in the city before the advancing American army advanced? Yamashita was not at the theatre of war at that time as he had already moved his main force to another hillside location in preparation of defending against the impending American forces.

    Cut off from the remaining units in Manila, which included naval troops under the command of a Japanese admiral whose disobedience in carrying out his orders have been on record, some credibily on this defence should have been given. Yamashita was not that all notorious and merciless killing machine that General MacArthur portrayed him to be. While it can be said that he was ruthless in battles, it must also be said that he had honour and integrity also.

    When the frontline Japanese troops advanced in Singapore and after advancing towards Alexandra Hospital they masacred most of the patients (wounded allied soldiers and civilians alike) as well as hospital staff. It was recorded that the following day, upon hearing of the massacre, Yamashita (who was commander of the Japanese forces in Malaya) went to the hospital and apologised to the remaining surviving patients who were there – he did this both vocally as well as formally by saluting them. I can attest to this record as being true because my father was a patient there (he being bayoneted by Japanese soldiers a couple of days earlier but survived. My dad even mentioned (which was not reported anywhere) that some of the japanese soldiers who came on the second day even offered cigarettes to the patients.

    These are some of the testimonies which could have saved Yamashita from a death sentence had they been presented at the trial because they would show the defendant to be not totally devoid of human feelings. But the speed of the trial and a right wing hawkish prosecution team made sure that he would not have this privilege.

    Granted, as an overall commander he would have to bear all responsibilities for the actions of the troops under him. This Yamashita did not deny. In fact he made it very clear that he would take all responsibilities. Which was the reason why he did not commit hara kiri (samurai’s code of honourable suicide) because if he did “some one else would have to take the blame”. He was referring to the Emperor of Japan.

    So, if the tribunal held the view that he should be accountable for the crimes of his men (though not necessarily in their presence) then the same should be held for the Emperor in whose name the war was fought. The Americans were having double standards there.

    I think Yamashita was guilt was indirect (his mitigating factor being not in physical control or command of those renegade Japanese troops stationed at Manilaat that time) in the same manner as the Emperor whose guilt was just as equal. But one was sentenced to hang while the other was allowed to continue to rule and absolved from all blame.

    I think rightfully, Yamashita should have got a life sentence.

    • Jerry Everett says:

      I fully agree with you. You definitely have a good point. Well, I guess MacArthur wasn’t as a great person as I used to believe. Luck for us that our president fired him during the Korean War, and later on he didn’t get very far when he tried to run for the presidency.

      • Dan T says:

        MacArthur was terrible. His defense of the Philippines was horribly inept, his actions in prosecuting Yamashita were terribly unfair, and he nearly provoked a nuclear war with China during the Korean war. I honestly don’t know why so many people think so highly of him.

    • Tora says:

      While I don’t agree he should have gotten life (aquittal or at most, a couple of years), I think the rest of your points are valid. No doubt some people needed to be held accountable for the atrocities, but Yamashita should NOT have been one of them. He was a highly capable and honourable soldier.

      The double-standard precedent is so botched it’s known as the “Yamashita Standard” in legal terms, and ironically it’s often the Americans who violate it. You can look it up yourself, but It’s basically the whole chain of command/responsibilty arguement.

      Put in a practical, modern context, it would mean that in the Abu Ghraib incident, General Ricardo Sanchez, not Lynndie England should have been held responsible. Absurd? That’s EXACTLY what happened to Yamashita.

    • rtcdmc says:

      After further investigation, it appears that Yamashita was a genuine war criminal. Hiyashi Hirofumi provides a well-documented case of the atrocities ordered by Yamashita in 1938 in Manchuria, in Singapore in 1941, and in the Phillipines in 1944. URL= To those who defend Yamashita: I urge you to examine the record, and examine your own conscience.

  2. Whose Justice ? says:

    Further to my earlier comments, it should also be noted that the Americans dropped 2 atomic bombs on Japan. These were weapons of mass destruction – they were weapons against humanity.

    They were dropped on 2 heavily populated cities. These were not strategic bombs or dropped strategically, say on military or other targets. They were dropped onto heavily populated areas. Just how many Japanese civilians died and how many others suffered a fate worse than hell no one can accurately say, but the figure is astounding by any measure.

    The man who made the decision to drop them was as guilty as any Japanese officers who gave orders to massacre filipino or any other South East Asian civilians. Two such bombs wiped off twice as much the total number of people the Japanese troops massacred. The Americans can claim they atomic bombs were used in order to bring peace.

    But the facts speak for themselves – 2 series of massacre and crimes against humanity were commited. One was done in the name of war and the other in the name of peace. By whatever name it was called – a massacre is still a massacre. This sought of American justification seemed to rule even decades after WW2.

    During the My Lai massacre (the Vietnam War) one US army general was quoted as saying (as a matter of army policy at that time and referring to mass destruction of people and property pertaining to targeted villages) that “… in order to save them (the villages) we had to destroy them.” This was their justification.

    So after the 2 atomic bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the My Lai (and other villages) Massacre, which American general or President was ever brought to trial for crimes against humanity?

    • John says:

      Yep, the U.S. dropped two WMD’s. BTW, what do you think the Japanese deployed against the Chinese? Look up Unit 731.

      • Rockfords says:

        Unit 731 should have been punished for crimes against humanity. Unfortunately the Americans cut a deal with them and gave them immunity from prosecution in exchange for the scientists giving their research to the USA and none of their allies. The Americans really don’t have the moral high ground here.

    • John S says:

      The atomic bombs were no worse than the earlier firebombings. WMD is a stupid term used by politicians and their water carriers to support their policies.

    • Prof. B.t.H. says:

      Hiroshima was the location of a large military base with appx. 60,000 troops. Nagasaki was a Japanese naval installation. Don’t lie when defending your point of view.

    • Jay says:

      Japan deserved to get nuked and the civilians of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are guilty of aiding and abetting the mass murder of tens of millions of innocent people. And the appropriate punishment is death.

      Yamashita directly ordered the massacre of countless innocent Filipinos and those innocents were not guilty like Japanese civilians were.

  3. Peter says:

    Yamashita got what he deserved. Only his exit was humane. Quit whining & get real.

  4. Don Colibri says:

    General Tomoyuki Yamashita did not “get what he deserved” in any measure whatsoever. If you read the accounts of his show “trial” written by his American Army defence lawyers you will quickly discover that it (the trial) was a complete sham from start to finish.

    General Yamashita was convicted and executed solely at the insistence of British authorities and General Douglas MacArthur. The British were attempting to wipe out the bitter memory of the greatest defeat in the history of the Empire, MacArthur who ignorantly imagined himself to be a great soldier, simply wanted to exterminate the glory of one who actually was. And killing the dirty yellow “nips” after the war wasn’t particularly difficult.

    The Malayan Campaign which ended when the British surrendered the fortress of Singapore and 130,000 troops to the 30,000 exhausted, starving men of the 25th Imperial Japanese Army, who were at that moment not only out of food and medicine but also out of both rifle and artillery rounds was one of the greatest military accomplishments in the war annals of human history.

    Yamashita’s victory was an extraordinary feat, perhaps the greatest victory of any general in the entirety of WW II and it broke the back of European colonialism in Asia forever.

    Long Live the Tiger of Malaya!


    • Jay says:

      Baloney- Yamashita directly ordered the massacre of millions of innocent Filipinos-
      He deserved far worse than he got.

  5. Cullum says:

    absolutely right the opinions and remarks from Don Colibri.
    Sorry, my mother tongue is German.
    Das Zeitrad kann man nicht mehr zurückdrehen.
    Die einzige Frage bleibt:
    Warum lernen wir immer noch nicht aus geschichtlichen Ereignissen
    und begehen laufend wieder gleiche Fehler …?
    Die Gerechtigkeit wird mit Füssen getreten.
    Es ist zum Himmel schreiend – aber dies hilft nichts.
    Diejenigen, die Schaden angerichtet haben werden für immer ein schlechtes Gewissen haben müssen. Das ist wohl die einzige
    Gerechtigketi. – Danke. –

    The wheel of time can turn back any more.
    The only question remains:
    Why do we still do not learn from historical events
    and continually commit the same mistake again …?
    The justice is trampled underfoot.
    It is screaming at the sky – but this does not help.
    Those who have caused harm will forever have to have a guilty conscience. This is probably the only
    Gerechtigketi. – Thank you. —

  6. Cullum says:

    T.Y. is not really dead. He had family and a child. This for an information. At the end we have a certain justice for all things so i hope. Thank you for all the good information.

  7. Alan Ireland says:

    See “The Sacrifice of Singapore: Churchill’s Biggest Blunder” (2011), by Michael Arnold – a book that exposes some of the myths about the capture of the “fortress” of Singapore. (Actually, it wasn’t a fortress. That was Churchill’s romantic term. He was always subordinating reality to rhetoric.) – Alan Ireland,

    • Michael says:

      It was less than the Japanese won Singapore, and more like the British commander did everything he could to lose it.

  8. JR Kane says:

    You people don’t know what your talking about the japs on that island were devils my Grandfather was there after his tank was damaged the japs captured him & tortured him , his fingernails were pulled out ,they did this at the end when they knew all was lost , even though he was one of the kindest people I ever knew whose door was allays open to anyone he disliked the Japanese till his dying day & for good reason , my other grandpa was navy at Pearl that fateful day , & every sea battle after he said they were nuts crashing into them , my Grandma just passed in 2011 & she would have told all of you if you had lived back then & you had to march into Tokyo & fight with knives & swords you wouldn’t have whined about those bombs then !!!

  9. robert e Johnson says:

    People quote how we killed over 250,000 Japanese people on Aug 6, and August 9, Well let’s put it this way. It would have cost this country 11/2 million military caualties to take the islands of Japan. So whose life is more important? Truman was correct on this point. “the greatest good for the greatest number.” If the American people would have learned that we could have saved military lives than few hundred thousand Japanese, Dewey would been president in 1949.

  10. rtcdmc says:

    I do not understand the weeping for Yamashita. He received the end that he chose. He wanted to take the blame, and did. Perhaps he hoped that the morality of his foe would enable him to escape the victor’s justice that has been meted out since the beginning of human history. He could have committed suicide, which was the traditional method of avoiding the shame of defeat. He could have controlled his subordinate, Iwabuchi. He could have surrendered, since he knew the Japanese could not win at that point. He chose his strategy in battle, and in defeat. His error was believing that his conquerors would abide by their own stated moral standards, which they did not.

  11. rtcdmc says:

    After further investigation, it appears that Yamashita was a genuine war criminal. Hiyashi Hirofumi provides a well-documented case of the atrocities ordered by Yamashita in 1938 in Manchuria, in Singapore in 1941, and in the Phillipines in 1944. URL= To those who defend Yamashita: I urge you to examine the record, and examine your own conscience.

  12. Geoff says:

    ‘This officer, of proven field merit, entrusted with high command involving authority adequate to responsibility, has failed this irrevocable standard; has failed his duty to his troops, to his country, to his enemy, to mankind; has failed utterly his soldier faith. The results are beyond challenge.’

    A pretty damning indictment of…MacArthur. The big difference? Yamashita surrendered and took responsibility. “Dugout Dug” bugged out and left Wainwright holding the bad.

  13. clawhammerjake says:

    Without doubt many terrible things happened to the Japanese people in WW2. They had time to think about that before they started the war.

  14. Jeremy Mondejar says:

    Hmmmm…. not one word of condolences to the victims of his massacres- its the typical self-righteous attitude of mass murdering butchers-

    I’m happy that we hanged this animal and I take great joy in his death-
    I hope he burns in hell-

  15. Jeremy Mondejar says:

    This animal’s last words were to blaspheme God in a pathetic attempt to profess his “innocence” and preserve his so-called “honor” in the eyes of history and posterity—

    Ohhh- the Japanese military, while he was in command, butchered millions of innocent Filipino men, women, and children- and he is somehow innocent? Countless pregnant women slashed in half with their fetuses ripped out

    My family saw and experienced first-hand the atrocities committed under his command-

    He may fool a few Europeans or Americans or Japanese-

    But this vile creature cannot fool us-

  16. TM says:

    I am in an archives looking right now at declassified documents about the trial. Of the many legal briefs amassed, one sticks out: \Command Responsibility.\

    \The commander of troops is responsible for atrocities committed by his troops, even though he did not order or authorize the atrocities; for it is his duty to keep informed of the conduct of his troops and to prevent them from committing atrocities…Where atrocities were committed by troops all during this period of Yamashita’s command, in all sections of his command, and on numerous occasions, involving thousands or persons, the Commission may find as a fact that atrocities on such a scale could not have occurred without his knowledge and at least tacit approval…[k]knowledge, combined with failure to prevent, on the part of a commander having a duty to prevent, makes him personally responsible for the atrocities.\ –Capt. Fishman.

    • Alan Ireland says:

      Back in the 1960s, the Japanese noted that this dictum clearly didn’t apply to US commanders when their troops committed atrocities. In Vietnam, General William Westmoreland’s means of communication were far superior to those of General Yamashita in the Philippines.

  17. -XO- says:

    TM is correct – it is the establishment of the overriding principle of Command responsibility which is necessary for the sake of humanity, and an aberrant maguffin should not be taken as eliminating the need for principle.

  18. JLSeagull says:

    During the My Lai massacre (the Vietnam War) one US army general was quoted as saying (as a matter of army policy at that time and referring to mass destruction of people and property pertaining to targeted villages) that … in order to save them (the villages) we had to destroy them.\n
    The comment was not made by a US army general in connection with the My Lai massacre in March 1968. It has been attributed to a Major Booris at a press conference following the destruction of Ben Tre in February 1968. Ben Tre is in the Mekong Delta, My Lai is in Quang Ngai Province almost 400 miles to the north.

    If you left wing nuts are going to rewrite history, I wish you would at least take the time to get your facts straight.

  19. Farmcreek says:

    Who were the other two executed ?

  20. Robert says:

    General MacArthur was a eminently capable commander as was his father before him.Futhermore,as Proconsul of Japan his reconstruction of that country was masterful.

  21. Nancy Morse says:

    While MacArthur violated ethics when he hanged this Yamashita, war is war.

    The Japanese have a history of not only taking other people’s property and country, but a history of abject cruelty that is unfathomable to us in the US who have no conception of such a mindset. The countless brutalities and thefts of what was not theirs to take, throughout history, is the story of Japan, evidently a country with no natural resources to speak of and no extra land. They have always felt entitled to take what they needed from other peoples.

    Their brutality was without end….I cannot believe that there are people in our country so sheltered that they do not accept the truth of how the times were and the sacrifices made by us in the USA as well as the countries of Europe. Those who fought, those who were caught in the middle but valiantly did not give in. The huge losses of lives. All because of countries who were ready to believe it was their right to possess other countries and decide who had the right to live or ought to be destroyed. The medical experiments! The destruction of the handicapped, the use of even human skin to make lampshades. Wake up, folks.

    Because we have become so isolated from any of the experiences of WW II or WW I, we are at enormous risk of letting dangers of today be ignored. We are at risk of losing our freedoms.
    Someone recently asked a bunch of college students about the Civil War. Some of the people responding, asked…”Was it fought in our country?” The South won, didn’t it? “I’m not sure….”
    And these people are old enough to vote in a national election?

    The atrocities are still becoming known. So many people could not bear to tell what they witnessed and survived.

    Thank you all for writing your thoughts. This is very valuable, no matter how you see things, as you can have read other people’s thoughts.

    MacArthur, I infer, was truly inept, but I remember seeing him on TV (black and white at that time) and as a high school student, I was totally impressed with his speech. When you are young and inexperienced, you just cannot know…..

    The Art of War – is about peace. It is read by many people all over the world, who are involved in university studies about the business world.
    One thing I recall reading in it is, paraphrased: ” You want to win at all costs. If you are dealing with a culture where a handshake is a promise…..go ahead and shake the hand. Your goal is to win. Honor is about winning, so do what you have to, whether you mean it or not. The thing is to sucker the other person into making a mistake, even if the mistake was in trusting you. War is War.”
    I mention this, because, after WW II, Japan did a lot of thinking.
    They decided to make success in business their “war.”
    They started by acquiring textiles (cloth) and employing cheap labor to make clothes for a world market. I know because America after the War was charging a lot for anything and those of us who were young could not afford to pay $20 for a half-slip. The third world countries started flooding America with beautifully-made suede little shoes we called “flats,” and $3 would buy you a lovely nylon half-slip…a relatively new item, and nylon being a product of the war research.
    A lot started to change. With our cost of living standard, things in America cost a whole lot more. The quality of the imports had a long way to go to match the quality of American-made goods but they could pay their employees less what with no unions to contend with, and that they were improving their own economy with massive amounts of world sales.
    My parents were determined that they would never, ever buy a product made in Japan. Well, Japan learned to put a fake name on the merchandise…in fact, the Magnavox transistor radio that they got my husband for his birthday….inside it said Made in Japan. We never told my parents.
    After the Japanese got capital from making clothes for the world markets, they went into transistors. Then they got into games for kids…The name Nintendo. Then, television, or the other way around, no matter. Then, cars. And the cars lasted not 100,000 miles before rusting out, as American builders had carefully planned.
    And no more carburetors. And so on and so on. The Americans had cornered the automobile market for so long and planned on people needing to replace a car every three years.
    That all changed.
    While we in America have a lot of thinking to do about why it is said that we owe other countries a lot of money…why????why do we, who rebuilt their war-torn countries…why do we owe anyone anything?

    Why don’t they owe us?

    And what lies ahead? It is the people who read all of these letters and think and write replies that may save us.

    Thank you for giving me an opportunity to sound off. I should have learned a long time ago, to think for myself. I was born in 1938. If you care to figure out my age, you may realize how far ahead in the game of life you already are, compared to me, who is finally waking up to the facts of life.
    I assumed that the people in charge, were decent, full of integrity.

    Apparently it just ain’t the case. Beware. Do your own thinking.

    Again, thanks for this opportunity!

    Retired Harpist – me

    Because of this we are at great risk today of losing all of our freedoms.

    Let it be known by ALL AMERICANS, that the things that saved us all from domination by the most terrible mindset given from an inferior man, to a people who were frustrated that they lost WW I in the first place….Hitler…..were brilliantly devised by Jewish scientists.
    I am referring to the Atomic Bomb. How truly justice was served that the people Hitler attempted to exterminate, and all of the hate he fomented by cleverly finding someone to be a scapegoat…so that countries that disliked each other would unite so as to hate someone else. Well, it sure seemed like a useful idea, right? I am attempting to be sarcastic.
    While these bombs were terrible, they were necessary to get the attention of the brutal Japanese. That, and the extreme weather in Russia, seemed to have played a large part in the Germans losing the war, what with the US having gotten Japan’s attention with the bombs.
    Think about these things while we sit in our air-conditioned or centrally-heated nice environment and go eat some fast food or crawl into a comfy bed every night.
    Anyone who wants to think things out, had better read The Art of War, written a long, long time ago by Sun Tzu

  22. Alan Ireland says:

    “All because of countries who were ready to believe it was their right to possess other countries and decide who had the right to live or ought to be destroyed.”

    Sounds like the USA today, which is trying, by one means or another, to club everyone into submission. Ever heard of the US push for “full-spectrum dominance”? Ever heard of Obama’s notorious “kill list”? Ever heard of “rendition” and torture? As Henry Miller once predicted, the US is dragging the whole world into the bottomless pit.

  23. Jay says:

    I’m glad that we hanged that savage, brutal and cruel subhuman animal.
    Oh, his army massacres countless millions of Filipinos while he is in charge and he is somehow innocent?

    I curse his soul and I defecate on his so-called “honor”.

    I will hate Yamashita and all those Japanese who invaded the Philippines and I will hate them forever in this life and in all lives that follow.

    I’m happy that this mass murderer now burns in Hell.

  24. Jay says:

    I wish that I was the one who personally executed this pig

  25. Alan Ireland says:

    Are you as keen to execute American war criminals? Don’t forget the millions killed by the US in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Afghanistan, Iraq and other countries in the Middle East.

    Yamashita’s main “crime” was defeating the British in Malaya, and knocking the white man off his pedestal. “We” couldn’t allow that to go unpunished.

  26. juliet7bravo says:

    Yamashita’s “crime” was kicking Mac’s worthless heinie, moving into Mac’s penthouse, and boinking Mac’s mistress…hanging him was a “legalized lynching”, just because Mac’s feelings were hurt.

    • jack anderson says:

      yep, Yamashita predictably came from the north and chased MacArthur out of his penthouse to Bataan, then to Corregidor, hell, he kept running all the way to Australia, but when he returned, he returned for revenge.

  27. Arkius says:

    MacArthur should have been court marshaled for his abysmal failure to defend the Philippines in “41”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

, , , ,

Sponsored Content: