Book Review: The Fox and the Whirlwind (Peter Aleshire) : WW | HistoryNet MENU

Book Review: The Fox and the Whirlwind (Peter Aleshire) : WW

8/12/2001 • Crazy Horse, Geronimo, Native American Indian Chiefs, Reviews, Wild West Reviews

The Fox and the Whirlwind: General George Crook and Geronimo, A Paired Biography, by PeterAleshire, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000, $30.

“Geronimo and General Crook were born to destroy each other.” With that note, Peter Aleshire begins his paired biography of two of the most famous participants in the Indian wars. Geronimo, born into the Bedonkohe band of the Chiricahua Apaches, and Ohio-born Crook were archenemies who embodied the strengths and weaknesses of their respective cultures. In chronicling these “perfect” enemies, The Fox and the Whirlwind also says a lot about the irreconcilable struggle between Indians and whites.

A shaman and a merciless warrior, but never a “chief,” Geronimo sought revenge with a passion and became, according to Aleshire, “the white man’s most hated foe and a romanticized symbol of Indian resistance.” Crook, on the other hand, could relate to–and even admire–the Indian lifestyle more than most of his fellow officers, but his understanding of the natives did not keep him from workinghard to destroy their cultures and grab their land. He was a gifted cavalry commander who proved his capabilities in the Civil War and then played a prominent role in both the Sioux and Apache wars.

In the Battle of the Rosebud in Montana Territory on June 17, 1876, Crook fought a large force ofSioux (including Crazy Horse) and Cheyenne warriors in an intense fight that produced relativelyfew casualties and no clear-cut victor. “Crook stubbornly claimed victory at the Rosebud for the restof his life,” writes Aleshire, even though the Rosebud fight had knocked Crook out of the so-calledLittle Bighorn campaign.

Against Geronimo in the Southwest and Mexico, there would be hard-fought campaigns without anybig battles (Geronimo did not have the forces for a Rosebudlike engagement). In March 1886, Crookobtained the surrender of the elusive Chiricahua. The general’s success was short-lived, though, asGeronimo again slipped away. Crook had been, according to Aleshire, “defeated by a warrior no lessdetermined, fighting in a hopeless cause,” and General Nelson A. Miles would get credit forGeronimo’s final surrender that September. The author suggests that Crook “probably had more incommon temperamentally and ethically with Crazy Horse and Geronimo than he had with thepoliticians and bureaucrats and politically minded generals….”

Aleshire uses two distinct voices as he alternates between Geronimo chapters and Crook chapters. Theauthor relies on numerous firsthand accounts, records and reports to tell Crook’s well-documentedtale in conventional fashion. For Geronimo’s side of the story he adopts a narrative voice (avoidingdirect quotes, accepting Geronimo’s claim to supernatural powers, etc.) that he says was “inspired bythe tone of Mari Sandoz’s brilliant biography of Crazy Horse.” If nothing else, this “switching” tacticemphasizes the chasm between the cultures of these two fighting men. By the way, they did not endup destroying each other.

Major Dominic J. Caraccilo