Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link Weider History Group RSS feed Weider Subscriptions Historynet Home page

Book Review: Gallipoli, by Peter Hart

By HistoryNet Staff 
Originally published by Military History magazine. Published Online: January 11, 2012 
Print Friendly
0 comments FONT +  FONT -

Gallipoli, by Peter Hart, Oxford University Press, New York, 2011, $34.95 

Books on the 1915 Gallipoli Campaign have been quite common in recent years, and more will inevitably emerge as its centennial approaches. Peter Hart's new study nevertheless merits attention. Hart, oral historian at London's Imperial War Museum, is an expert on British participation in World War I and combines the scholar's devotion to solid research with the oral historian's appreciation for personal perspective. 

Gallipoli, he states early on, "was a lunacy that never could have succeeded, an idiocy generated by muddled thinking." In conception the campaign was rank stupidity on the part of First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill. The war's outcome almost solely depended on events on the Western Front, and the attempt to knock the Ottoman Empire out of the war by landing troops on the Gallipoli Peninsula was a useless diversion of resources.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to Military History magazine

In execution the campaign suffered from the mismanagement of General Sir Ian Hamilton, whose complacence and unnecessarily complex planning all but guaranteed failure. Moreover, the logistical difficulties of fighting a campaign so far from Great Britain, and the inexperience and generally poor leadership of the troops who fought it, led to horrific casualties. Hart correctly credits the toughness and bravery of the Turkish troops defending the peninsula, incorporating some Turkish sources into his research and chronicling how Gallipoli played a pivotal role in the rise to power of Lt. Col. Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, Turkey's future president.

While Hart's arguments about Gallipoli are for the most part nothing new, what distinguishes this book is his research into a trove of primary source material, in particular soldiers' accounts of their experiences. Gallipoli is replete with lengthy and compelling quotations by Australian, British, French and Turkish soldiers, most never before published. Hart's intimate familiarity with the battlefield, where he leads regular tours, adds a level of understanding absent from other books. Overall, Gallipoli is an important contribution to the growing literature on this epic and tragic campaign.

—Edward G. Lengel

 

 



Recommended


Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Related Articles


History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer
HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
STAY CONNECTED WITH US
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by Weider History, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
Weider History

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer! | StreamHistory.com
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2014 Weider History. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy