Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link World History Group RSS feed World History Group Subscriptions Historynet Home page

Battle at Sand Creek: The Military Perspective (Book Review)

Originally published on Published Online: June 12, 2006 
Print Friendly
4 comments FONT +  FONT -

Reviewed by Alexander Cook
By Gregory F. Michno
Upton and Sons, El Segundo, Calif., 2004

If you want to read another retelling of the Sand Creek tale (traditionally referred to as a "massacre") in which the blood-thirsty Coloradoans led by Colonel John Chivington did the peaceful Cheyennes in Black Kettle's village an immoral wrong, then this is not the work for you. This 329-page book offers something else altogether—the perspective of the white soldiers, as well as that of the white civilians of Colorado Territory, on the infamous November 29, 1864, event. For that reason alone, Gregory F. Michno's latest offering will ruffle some feathers, as did his article "The Real Villains of Sand Creek" (December 2003 Wild West). Not that there is anything wrong with that, especially not when you do your research and homework the way that Michno does. Interestingly enough, Michno made his biggest splash in the Western history world in the mid-1990s with an article in Wild West Magazine and a book—both called Lakota Noon—that told the story of George Custer's Little Bighorn defeat through the perspective of the Plains Indian victors.

Not that Michno has really "sided" with the soldiers at Sand Creek. He does not condone the military actions. "The Sand Creek affair was not a stellar event in American history, but the fight, the surrounding events, and the people involved did not get a fair hearing," the Colorado author writes in his introduction. Back in the 1990s, he figured rightly that Custer's Last Stand needed an Indian narrative. In the 2000s, he figured that the standard Sand Creek Massacre treatment called out for a new perspective. It's hard to disagree with that notion even if one doesn't totally buy all of his arguments, such as that traditional heroes Major Edward Wynkoop and Black Kettle must share in much of the blame for the tragedy.

For anyone who can keep an open mind about Sand Creek, Michno makes plenty of convincing arguments. His most interesting chapter may be the one called "Legacy," in which he examines how politics played a role in the affair and its aftermath. Michno—as the title of the book announces—says that Sand Creek was definitely a battle, not a massacre, albeit one with atrocities afterward. According to Michno, in the trans-Mississippi West from 1850 to 1890, Sand Creek was surpassed in white casualties by only six battles. Yes, the Little Bighorn was one. The others: Pyramid Lake (1860), Birch Coulee (1862), the Badlands (1864), Dove Creek (1865) and the Fetterman Fight (1866). The latter, in which the U.S. soldiers involved were all wiped out, used to be called a massacre, too. In light of plans to make the Sand Creek site into a unit of the National Park System, a decision will have to be made on whether or not to call it the "Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site" or something else. Whoever makes that decision, as well as the rest of us who take an interest in the Indian wars, would do well to read Michno's book first.

4 Responses to “Battle at Sand Creek: The Military Perspective (Book Review)”

  1. 1
    Kyle says:


  2. 2
    Meredith says:

    thanks im doing a repot on this topic and this was really helpful

  3. 3
    Meredith says:

    srry i ment to say report not repot

  4. 4

    [...] 3rd Colorado Volunteers massacre Black Kettles' camp of Cheyenne and Arapahoe Indians at Sand Creek, [...]

Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Related Articles

History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet? is brought to you by World History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
World History Group

World History Group Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer!
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2015 World History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy