Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link Weider History Group RSS feed Weider Subscriptions Historynet Home page

Were the USS Pueblo Incident and the Tet Offensive Coordinated?

Originally published under Ask Mr. History. Published Online: June 10, 2014 
Print Friendly
0 comments FONT +  FONT -

Mr. History:

I have been reading an account of the Siege of Khe Sanh, which began in January ,1968. There was a note in passing in my readings that the U.S.S. Pueblo was seized shortly after the siege began and incidentally just a few days before the Tet Offensive kicked off. My question is: Are there any indicators that the North Vietnamese and the North Koreans, either with or without the help of the Soviets and/or Chinese actively colluded to time these events so closely as to have an impact on U. S. planning and operations?

It was just a strange thought of mine, but I really do not know if the Communist Forces were that globally sophisticated or perhaps that politically connected or inclined. Any enlightenment would be appreciated!

Kurt Nelson

? ? ?

Dear Mr. Nelson,

The question of just how coordinated the Pueblo incident and the Tet Offensive were is recently addressed in In the Shadow of Vietnam, a 2013 book on the diplomatic relations between the two by Hungarian historian Balász Szalontai (see attached review).
 
http://h-net.msu.edu/cgi-bin/logbrowse.pl?trx=vx&list=H-Diplo&month=1307&week=b&msg=KHgG2Mq48E4YxVL0putfKg
 
Although Mr. Szalontai has had invaluable access to the former Hungarian People's Republic's documents on relations throughout the Communist Bloc, his efforts were still limited by the paucity of documentation specifically covering the direct relations between North Vietnam and North Korea themsevles, which in 1968 both regarded themselves as more actively engaged in revolution and less compromised in their convictions than the superpowers aiding them, the Soviet Union and China. Nevertheless, he continues to believe that in practice both Hanoi and Pyongyang were pursuing separate agendas more in line with their own national characters and objectives than working together to coordinate a "united front." North Vietnam had spent a long time working up to the Tet Offensive in spite of misgivings in its own camp (Le Duan apparently overruled Vo Nguyen Giap when it came to getting it underway), whereas the North Koreans saw Pueblo's close spying pass as an opportunity and grabbed it. Coincidental though the two events were in terms to time, if Pueblo's seizure was intended to divert American attention from South Vietnam on the eve of Tet, it didn't work. Tet had major consequences, both as a tactical defeat for the Communists and as an unexpectedly effective strategic blow, just by the fact that it happened at all, on wavering American resolve. The Pueblo affair, in comparison, left the North Koreans feeling pretty good about themselves, but otherwise accomplished nothing vis-à-vis the balance of power with South Korea and the United States.

Sincerely,

 

Jon Guttman
Research Director
Weider History Group
More Questions at Ask Mr. History

 

Don't miss the next Ask Mr. History question! To receive notification whenever any new item is published on HistoryNet, just scroll down the column on the right and sign up for our RSS feed.



Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Related Articles


History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer
HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
STAY CONNECTED WITH US
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by Weider History, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
Weider History

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer! | StreamHistory.com
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2014 Weider History. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy