Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link World History Group RSS feed World History Group Subscriptions Historynet Home page

The Bolshevik Who Believed in Tanks

By Stephen Budiansky 
Originally published by World War II magazine. Published Online: March 30, 2011 
Print Friendly
1 comment FONT +  FONT -

During World War II, and for a dozen years after, Mikhail Tukhachevsky was a nonperson. A celebrated Bolshevik hero of the civil wars that followed the 1917 Russian Revolution, Tukhachevsky had risen swiftly through the ranks of the Red Army with a combination of cold-blooded ruthlessness and military genius to become its chief of staff and one of the Soviet Union's most innovative military theorists and strategists.

But in 1937 he was denounced for organizing "a military-Trotskyist conspiracy"; on Stalin's orders he was secretly arrested, tried, and shot in his cell the next day in the basement of the Lubyanka, the notorious Moscow headquarters of the Soviet secret police. The signed "confession" produced at his trial was stained with his own blood.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to World War II magazine

Following his execution, Tukhachevsky ceased to exist. His military writings were banned. As Stalin's purges of the Red Army officer corps grew to the thousands, the message was unmistakable: anyone who showed the slightest deviation from the correct Stalinist line would be next. And in the Red Army on the eve of World War II, there was no more suspect deviation than the revolutionary ideas about the role of the tank that Tukhachevsky had championed. At his trial, he had been specifically condemned for seeking the "rapid formation of tank and mechanized units." Decadent capitalists "hid behind mechanical contrivances"; true Marxists placed their trust in the masses.

Though undeniably a courageous and tough soldier, Tukhachevsky did not at first blush seem to be the stuff that subtle or innovative military genius was made of. Much of his career was built on a talent for brutality, opportunism, and doctrinaire politics. The scion of a noble family, he had served as a lieutenant in World War I; captured by the Germans, he tried to escape from prison camps four times, succeeding on his fifth. Jumping to the Bolshevik cause, he had put down mutinies and peasant revolts with appalling barbarity, wiping out rebellious villages with poison gas. As Patrick Wright relates in his book Tank, Tukhachevsky also skillfully did in rivals on the general staff with the same sort of trumped-up denunciations of "bourgeois ideology" that would later bring about his own end.

Yet as early as 1923 he had also begun to formulate a theory of modern tank warfare that placed the Soviets well ahead of such better known prophets of the blitzkrieg as the British writer J. F. C. Fuller or Germany's Heinz Guderian. Most Western armies were thinking about the tank in a decidedly limited role, perhaps replacing the horse in cavalry units as a way to carry out swift reconnaissance or flanking attacks. More enthusiastic proponents like Fuller saw the tank as the spearhead of fast attacks that would break through the stalemate of static trench warfare that had bogged down million-man armies in the First World War and thus bring back the traditional concept of mobility to the battlefield.

But Tukhachevsky saw the tank as the centerpiece of an entirely new conception of land battle. As he explained in lectures and writings, the vast extended fronts of modern warfare made it impossible to gain a victory in a single blow; thus a series of linked operations were necessary across the battlefield to achieve a strategic objective.

In particular, he argued, it was necessary to strike an enemy in depth. An initial breakthrough would be followed by successively deeper plunges into the enemy's rear to pursue and destroy his remaining forces. In his conception the tank was not simply the spearhead to be followed by infantry; follow-on forces needed to be just as swift and powerful, and thus mechanized too.

It was only after the Soviets' crushing defeats during the German invasion in 1941 that Tukhachevsky's ideas about deep battle were quietly rehabilitated—leading to the stunning Soviet counteroffensive beginning with the Battle of Kursk in the summer of 1943. But it was only after Stalin's death that Tukhachevsky received recognition by name for his posthumous contribution to the Soviet victory, when he was officially exonerated in 1957.


One Response to “The Bolshevik Who Believed in Tanks”

  1. 1
    Joel says:

    Very interesting story. However, it appears to be another case of "you reap what you sow".

Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Related Articles

History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet? is brought to you by World History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
World History Group

World History Group Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer!
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2015 World History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy