Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link Weider History Group RSS feed Weider Subscriptions Historynet Home page

George Pickett

Facts, information and articles about George Pickett, a Confederate General during The Civil War

George Pickett Facts

Born

January 16 1825, Richmond, Virginia

Died

July 30, 1875, Norfolk, Virginia

Initial Rank

Captain, United States Army

Highest Rank Achieved

Major General, Confederate States Army

Armies Led

Pickett’s Division, First Corps, Army of Northern Virginia

Battle Fought

Peninsular Campaign
Battle Of Fredericksburg
Battle Of Gettysburg
Pickett’s Charge
Battle Of Petersburg
Appomattox Court House Battle

George Pickett Articles

Explore articles from the History Net archives about George Pickett

» See all George Pickett Articles

George Pickett summary: George Edward Pickett (1825 – 1875) Born in Richmond, Pickett was the eldest of eight children. He attended the United States Military Academy and graduated soon after a war broke out which would benefit his military career.

He fought in the Mexican War and gained a brevet promotion to captain after he carried the American colors to the roof of the palace to announce their victory in the Battle of Chapultepec. Pickett was assigned to the Washington Territory and became involved in a dispute with Great Britain. This became known as The Pig War but no conflict arose.

Picket In The Civil War

Pickett resigned from the US Army to join the Confederate Army as a colonel then became brigadier general on January 14th 1862. He first took action in combat in the Peninsula Campaigns. Pickett was shot in the shoulder at the Battle of Gaines’s Mill. When he returned to the war, three months later, he was promoted to major general and took command of a small division under General James Longstreet.

Pickett’s Charge At Gettysburg

Pickett was to join General Robert E. Lee on the third day of the Battle of Gettysburg on July 3, 1863. Pickett was in charge of his own fresh division alongside two other depleted divisions. They were to charge farthest into Union lines, but The Union troops decimated Pickett’s division and were forced to retreat, effectively ending the Battle of Gettysburg. Though Pickett did not lead the attack, it became known as “Pickett’s Charge”.

After this defeat, Pickett continued to command his division through the war. He was again defeated in the Battle of Five Forks, which led to the eventual surrender and collapse of the Confederate Army.


 

Articles Featuring George Pickett From History Net Magazines

Remembering Pickett’s Charge at the Battle of Gettysburg

Although literature on the three-day Battle of Gettysburg is abundant, this letter by Confederate Captain Joseph Graham offers a different perspective on the fight, particularly its final hours. An eyewitness, Graham notes "too feeble determination" as a reason for the failure of "Pickett’s Charge," a famous, desperate rush against the center of the Union lines on July 3, 1863, the last day of the battle.

This letter to his father, William A. Graham, a former Whig governor and conservative Confederate senator-elect, is characteristically thoughtful and literate. However, in his enthusiasm for Confederate arms Captain Graham errs when he concludes that Confederate artillery had silenced the Union’s guns just before the awesome charge. To the contrary, Federal artillery was concentrated and effective, as Major General George E. Pickett’s Southerners discovered.

Joseph Graham (1837-1907) graduated from the University of North Carolina in 1857 and from the University of North Carolina in 1859. When war came, he abandoned his nascent medical practice to join the "Charlotte Artillery." This unit entered state service as Company C, 10th North Carolina (later the 1st North Carolina Artillery). At Gettysburg, armed with three 3-inch rifled cannon, one 12-pounder howitzer, and two bronze 6-pounder smoothbore guns, "Graham’s Battery" was assigned to Lieutenant General A.P. Hill’s Corps. Young Graham had four brothers who were Confederate officers, and was cousin-in-law to general officers Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson, Daniel Harvey Hill, and Rufus Barringer.

Graham’s original letter is in the Southern Historical Collection at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. It was published in The Papers of William A. Graham.

Joseph Graham to
William A. Graham
Culpepper [Culpeper] County,
July 30th., 1863.

Since I left Kinston, I have travelled between seven and Eight Hundred miles, and have been engaged in one of the bloodiest conflicts of the War. We met the Enemy about two miles from Gettysburg, Pa., on the 1st. day of this month, and drove him, after a sharp contest, lasting all day, to Cemetery Hill, beyond town, distant about half a mile. During the next morning, nothing more than skirmishing occurred, until about two and a half P.M. When Longstreet’s Corps arrived upon the Enemy’s left, and commenced engaging him in his fortified position on the "Hill." In about half an hour, the fight became general, along our right, and right centre, (the right half of our Corps.) Our men advanced and fell back, in succession, until about six o’clock, when a desperate charge dislodged the Enemy from his position, but unfortunately our reserve was not near enough to support the brave, but decimated ranks of the assailants. Just at this time, the sun being nearly down, our Battalion was ordered up at a gallop, under the thickest fire I ever experienced to support our men, who had been overpowered by the enemy’s reinforcements, and compelled to fall back with great loss. Darkness soon put an end to the operations, and the night passed off very quietly. This night and the night previous, the Enemy spent in fortifying his positions, already very strong from the nature of the ground. it was equal, if not superior to his situation at Malvern Hill. And that I think, naturally, the finest position for defence I ever saw.

We slept upon the field, and no sound was audible, except continuous din of the enemy’s tools, and the awful groans of the wounded and dying. The next sun brought the fatal 3rd. day of July. Everything remained quiet ’till about 12 1/2 P.M. (by the watch I saw) when we began shelling their positions. On both sides I think there must have been between 350 and 400 guns in action. And after the heaviest Artillery duel of the war, (and said to have been heavier than the cannonade at Balaklava) and lasting about one hour and ten minutes, we silenced all their guns. They report that we killed and disabled nearly all their cannoneers, and they were compelled to get detachments from their Infantry to man their pieces. My men behaved very handsomely indeed, and shells from my guns blew up two of their Caissons loaded with Ammunition. The firing was terrific, and I never expect to hear anything to compare with it. We whipped them fairly in the Artillery, and they were in an elevated and fortified position, and we have no works at all. The distance was about 1 1/4 miles, over an open and gradual slope. The Infantry were to have charged through the dense smoke immediately upon the cessation of our fire, but by some mismanagement, there was quite a delay, until everything became settled, and the Enemy had time to prepare for the charge.

It was a very oppressive day, and our troops were much fatigued by the work of the two days previous, and consequently had to advance very slowly, exposed all the time to the Enemy’s fire. The most of our Artillery Ammunition then expended, we could not do much towards driving off their batteries. However, our men advanced steadily, but I fear with too feeble determination, some, up to the work, others, not so far, and so on, ’till some did not go more than 150 yds. Gen’l Pettigrew told me that when the front line gave way, (we advanced in two lines) he could see their Artillery limbering up their guns to retire from the works. Our second line was 1000 yards from the first, and of course not near enough to support it. This being the case, the first was completely routed, and broke through the second, spoiling the whole affair. I saw the whole charge, the view was open from my position, to the Enemy’s works, on the Heights. The lines moved right through my Battery, and I feared then I could see a want of resolution in our men. And I heard many say, "that is worse than Malvern Hill," and "I don’t hardly think that position can be carried," etc., etc., enough to make me apprehensive about the result. Davis’ Miss. Brigade was the first to give way. The slaughter is represented as terrible, but so far as I would judge, it was not near as bad as reported. And much is owing to the cowardice of the enemy, for when our men retreated, so much disordered, if they had charged upon them, our Army would have been utterly routed and ruined. It is painful to make such admissions, but they are nevertheless true. this part being over, the day passed off quietly in the centre. Gen’l Lee’s plan was excellent, but some one made a botch of it indeed. Had we carried those Heights, that Army would have been ruined. There were only two avenues of escape, and Ewell had one, and Longstreet the other. So that they must have surrendered or been cut to pieces, and entirely ruined. They would have been scattered over the whole country, and we must have had Washington City, and Baltimore. And I hoped a speedy peace. But the fortune of war was otherwise. On the night of the 3rd. Inst., after the crippling of that day, the Enemy began to retire his Artillery, and kept moving out all night, Longstreet having moved back when we could not carry their works. On the 4th. Inst. they threw out heavy lines of skirmishers, and pretended as if they intended to advance upon us. That night, about dusk, both Armies, badly crippled, retired in different directions. they towards Baltimore and we towards Hagerstown. If we had only remained ’till the next day we could have claimed the victory. But our supplies were exhausted, and a retrograde movement absolutely necessary. And for want of transportation, we left about 4500 wounded to fall into their hands. Neither side buried the dead of July 3rd. before leaving. It was an awful affair altogether.

Did Robert E. Lee Doom Himself at Gettysburg?By blindly relying on poor intelligence and saying far too little to his generals, Lee may have sealed the Rebels’ fate.
Fighting and Dying for the Colors at Gettysburg

Nearly two months after the battle of Gettysburg 24-year-old Isaac Dunsten of the 105th Pennsylvania Infantry lay on officers' row at Camp Letterman, the large tent hospital established just east of the town. On July 2, 1863, the second day …

America's Civil War Comes to West PointThough the Corps of Cadets was forced apart by political differences in 1860-61, and passions grew intense, there were more tears than hurrahs among the Northerners when their Southern friends resigned. The last institution to divide, the Academy was one of the first to reunite.
Life at West Point of Future Professional American Civil War OfficersWhether they spent their energy studying or sneaking off to Benny Havens's tavern, the future professional officers of the Civil War left West Point with enough stories for a lifetime -- and an enduring common bond.
Book Review:Gettysburg 1863: High Tide of the Confederacy (Carl Smith): CWT


Gettysburg 1863: High Tide of the Confederacy, by Carl Smith, Osprey Military, London, England, (212) 685-5560, 128 pages, softcover, $16.95.

Although a mountain of books have been written about the Battle of Gettysburg over the last 130 years, the logistical …

Book Review: General George E. Pickett in Life and Legend (by Lesley J. Gordon): CWT


General George E. Pickett in Life and Legend, by Lesley J. Gordon, University of North Carolina Press, P.O. Box 2288, Chapel Hill, NC 27515, 269 pages, $29.95.

George E. Pickett is a demanding subject for a biographer. He left behind …

Book Review: Deeply FlawedMajor General George E. Pickett is widely recognized because of his association with a single event.
Book Review: General George E. Pickett in Life and LegendWho was George Pickett, and how did he come to be one of the most recognizable individuals--at least by name--of the Civil War?
Book Review: Lee vs. Pickett: Two Divided By War : ACWLee vs. Pickett: Two Divided by War will stand as a groundbreaking study of a fascinating relationship.
Battle of Gettysburg: Remembering Pickett's ChargeFew judgments have generated as much controversy as the Confederate decision to make a last desperate attack on the center of the Union lines on the afternoon of July 3, 1863, at Gettysburg.
The Proving Ground - April '96 Civil War Times Feature

thePROVINGground

The Mexican War gave future civil war generals their first taste of combatJOHN C. WAUGH

Chatham Roberdeau Wheat would one day lead a famous Louisiana battalion called "Wheat's Tigers" into battle for the Confederacy. He would fight and die …

Battle of Gettysburg: Union General George Stannard and the 2nd Vermont BrigadeThe first Vermonter to enlist in the war, Union General George Stannard helped turn the tide at Gettysburg.
Mexican War: The Proving Ground for Future American Civil War GeneralsFor young American army officers of the time, the Mexican War was not only the road to glory, it was the road to promotion--a proving ground for future Civil War generals.

Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer
HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
STAY CONNECTED WITH US
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by Weider History, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
Weider History

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer! | StreamHistory.com
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2014 Weider History. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy