| |

Allied Airborne Forces in World War II: Surviving the Devil's CauldronBy Bernd Horn | MHQ | Single Page | one comment | Print This Post | Email This Post The daring German airborne operations in Norway and the Low Countries in the spring of 1940 forcibly introduced the world to a new form of warfare. They also altered the widely held prewar conceptions of many senior Allied leaders that parachute operations were little more than just a stunt. In the aftermath of the German aerial onslaught, the Allies began to consider a paratroop arm, largely at the behest of fiery British Prime Minister Winston Churchill. However, even his influence was initially muted. Churchill's military commanders resisted vehemently, in part due to their conservatism but also because they were facing the immediate crisis of defending England and rebuilding a British army capable of fighting a modern war. Most of the commanders felt that airborne forces would be of little use in the war against Germany. As a result, Churchill initially agreed to a parachute corps of five hundred men instead of the five thousand he had originally envisioned. The Americans were also content with establishing a test platoon. The startling success of German paratroopers in the conquest of Crete in May 1941 enraged Churchill. On May 27, he declared, "We ought to have 5,000 parachutists and one Airborne Division on the German model." Four days later, the British general and air staffs agreed to press forward as quickly as possible with the airborne program. A brigade of twenty-five hundred fully trained parachutists was to be formed by July 1, 1941. Even before this was achieved, army staff began to plan for a division-sized organization. On an almost parallel track, the Americans also ramped up their efforts on the same scale, converting their 82nd Motorized Infantry Division to an airborne role on June 26, 1942. Although the German success in Crete was clearly a catalyst in changing the Allied philosophy toward airborne forces, there were other factors, including public perception. By the summer of 1942, the tide of the war was beginning to shift, and the public demanded heroes. Tough, fearless paratroopers could satisfy that need. "It builds our morale, it stiffens the spine and braces the backbone of the public to hear talk about the independent type airborne operation," said Lt. Gen. E.M. Flanagan. After years of Allied defeats, the public hungered for options to strike back, as Flanagan elaborated, with a force able "to deal a lethal blow to the enemy, deep in his backyard." It wasn't long until Field Marshal Bernard Law Montgomery could say, "When the maroon beret [signifying a paratrooper] is seen on the battlefield, it at once inspires confidence, as it is well known that its wearers are good men and true and have the highest standards in all things." The media assisted in defining the modern paratrooper's role. Numerous newspaper articles described the parachute volunteers as "hard as nails," the toughest and smartest soldiers in a country's army. "They are good, possibly great soldiers," wrote one journalist, "hard, keen, fast-thinking and eager for battle." According to Larry Gough in the American magazine Liberty, "In the first place, [parachutists] are perfect specimens. They have to be, because their work is rough, tough, and full of excellent opportunities to get hurt. Mentally they're quick on the trigger, again because their job demands it, because split seconds can make the difference between instant death or a successfully completed job." Yet another writer insisted they were the most "daring and rugged soldiers…daring because they'll be training as paratroops: rugged because paratroops do the toughest jobs in hornet nests behind enemy lines." Soon it would have been impossible for military leaders to ignore this advancement in modern warfare. Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Tags: 20th - 21st Century, Airborne Operations, Historical Conflicts, World War II
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Copyright © 2010 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
One Comment to “Allied Airborne Forces in World War II: Surviving the Devil's Cauldron”
Mr. Horn's article is informative, and I believe, more accurate than most that I have read.
Airborne operations will always be among the most difficult to precisely execute, and I believe the difficulties do not, as it seems popular with some to imagine, stem from the use of novice or cowardly aircrews. The airborne aspect of the Normandy invasion in particular, seems to have become a focus for such myth and misinformation, to the extent that even the 101st Airborne Division's own website was forced to revise its web page, in the direction of reality. Even at that, it was hardly thorough.
Steven Ambrose, generally excellent author that he was, was even called to account for his fictionalization and denigration of airborne operations. He admitted it, but never offered an apology. Unfortunately, many parrot his writing on the subject.
To the alleged use of amateur flight crews in the Normandy operation, the answer lies in the fact that everyone, from Eisenhower on down knew that this was an operation that had to succeed, for there would be no second chance. The most experienced aircrews were therefore used, not the most recent graduating classes as some prefer to imagine. It should be remembered that the British considered that the entire airborne aspect of the Normandy operation would be completely hopeless (and the British were hardly short of experienced aircrews), and opposed it until it actually succeeded, even though they consented to participate
It was by their experience that the aircrews were able to get as many troops on target as they did, as they were operating without pathfinders, at night, in fog, over territory that they had never overflown before, and under intense enemy fire. Another myth maintains that they panicked in the face of the ground fire, and took evasive action. They were, however, as used to being shot at as any bomber crews, and were no more prone to breaking flight discipline than anyone. There was no accelerating, as the aircraft were spaced at 100 feet, measured from nose-to nose, and each aircraft took up 64 feet of that space. Accelerating would have produced an instant mid-air collision with the preceding plane. The tight formations were mandated by the necessity to put the troops on the ground in the maximum possible density. Similarly, there was no diving out of formation. Any aircraft which dives out of formation during a troop drop will be immediately colliding with the troopers who are parachuting from the planes in front of them, as all troops in a serial of planes jump at the same time. Anybody who put a paratrooper through his propeller and lived to tell about it, would shortly face a firing squad. It never happened.
Col. Robert Sink, Commander of the 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division, considered the difficulties of what they were about to undertake at Normandy. He was to fly in the lead aircraft of serial #11, comprised of almost 50 planes, which would carry his 1st Battalion. The pilot of his aircraft would be Col. Charles Young, Commander of the 439th Troop Carrier Group. Young commanded not only the 50 planes carrying the 1st Battalion, but also the approximately 50 planes carrying the second Battalion as serial #12, and 100 more which would tow gliders. Col. Sink may have been among the first of those to underestimate what the Troop Carriers could do: He told Young that he didn't believe that Young could put him on the ground anywhere near the farmhouse that was Sink's designated command post, in the conditions that they were about to fly into. Young bet 10 English Pounds that he could put Sink within 300 yards, and actually put Sink within 200 yards, dropping Sink's second officer into the farmyard in the process. The entire 1st battalion jumped at the same time, and serial#12 arrived six minutes later, dropping the 2nd Battalion right on top of the 1st. Serial #12 was led by one of Col. Young's senior Officers, and included Lt.Col. Robert J Martin, Young's Group Communications Officer (Martin had been in the Air corps since the 1930's). Later, in England, Col Sink paid Young – double.
It is true that a substantial number of troops were scattered, and some, badly. But in the prevailing conditions, it was actually a better drop than even Eisenhower had hoped for, and the strategic planning anticipated greater airborne losses and lesser effectiveness than actually resulted.
For the troops who were dropped wrongly, it can be said that it was, indeed, their resolve, and their willingness to fight alone if necessary, that paid dividends beyond their numbers, and even beyond the plan.
It is noteworthy that the troopers of Col. Sink's 1st and 2nd Battalions were actually strung out for over a mile. There is no inconsistency here in considering this particular kind of scattering to be a perfect drop, because it was.The normal jump time for a stick of paratroopers from a C-47 was 30 seconds, or one man per second. Essentially, they were hooked up to a static line, and they rushed the door. The jump speed was 120 mph, and in 30 seconds, the plane had traveled one mile. As all troopers in a squadron element jumped simultaneously, and as the planes were in train, the first man from the last plane and the last man from the first plane were separated on the ground by well over a mile. And this would be the least dispersion possible under daylight circumstances in peacetime.
In the invasion across the Rhine, about 200 B-24's were modified to airdrop heavy cargoes, and they went in with the troop carriers. The B-24 crews later said that they were used to taking 20mm hits, but from aircraft, not from ground guns, and that they were also used to having 88's go off in their laps, but not so close to the guns that they could hear them going off as well. They expressed a great admiration for the C-47 crews, who operated in that as a normal environment. I have an original letter dated 15 January 1945, from Gen. Anthony Mcauliffe to a Troop Carrier Wing Commander, expressing his appreciation for the actions of the C-47 units that resupplied him at Bastogne, some of them taking 25% casualties, and still returning the next day. It is unfortunate that some seem to have relegated the Troop Carriers to having given second-class service, and thereby, effectively relegated them to second-class graves.
By Dennis Moran on Dec 12, 2009 at 6:13 am