HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

World War II: North Africa Campaign

World War II  | 5 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

After the American debacle at Kasserine Pass, command of the U.S. II Corps passed to Patton. He wanted to mount an attack to drive to the coast, but Alexander would authorize only limited attacks designed to draw German forces away from the Mareth positions. At that point, Alexander simply did not trust American units. In fact, many among the British forces disparagingly referred to their American allies as our Italians. Patton’s limited attack between March 17 and 25 was successful, however, tying down the 10th Panzer Division near El Guettar.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to World War II magazine

On March 20, Montgomery attempted a night penetration of the center of the Mareth Line. The attack had failed by March 22. The next day, he shifted the weight of the main attack around the southwestern flank of the line, through the Matmata Hills. By March 26, his forces broke through the Tebaga Gap. The Italian First Army and the remainder of the Afrika Korps were forced back. Under continuous pressure from the Eighth Army on one side and the U.S. II Corps on the other, the Axis forces withdrew to Enfidaville.

By April 7, the Allied First and Eighth armies linked up, squeezing the Axis into a small pocket. On the east coast, the Eighth Army took Gabés on April 6, Sfax on April 10, Sousse on April 12, and Enfidaville on April 21. In the north, the U.S. II Corps, now under Lt. Gen. Omar N. Bradley, took Mateur on May 3 and Bizerte on May 7. Montgomery’s 7th Armoured Division captured Tunis on May 7. The remaining Axis forces in Tunisia were caught in two pockets, one between Bizerte and Tunis, and the other on isolated Cape Bon.

Arnim surrendered his forces on May 13, 1943. The Royal Navy, waiting in strength offshore, made sure that few Germans or Italians escaped to Sicily. Axis losses in Tunisia alone totaled 40,000 dead or wounded, 240,000 prisoners, 250 tanks, 2,330 aircraft and 232 ships. British and American casualties were 33,000 and 18,558 respectively. For the entire North African campaign, the British suffered 220,000 casualties. Total Axis losses came to 620,000, which included the loss of three field armies.

On the strategic level, the North African campaign was a watershed for the Western Allies. For the first time in the war they had decisively defeated the Axis, and especially the Germans, on the ground. The psychological value of the victory cannot be minimized. The U.S. Army, too, had finally gotten into the war and acquitted itself well after a shaky start at Kasserine Pass. The British and Americans perfected the combined command structure that would serve the Grand Alliance for the remainder of the war. The various Free French factions were finally united and organized under the Allied command. And perhaps most important, the British proved the value of Ultra intelligence and refined the system for getting the necessary information to the field commanders.

On the downside, the Allies were now out of position with a huge force of almost 1 million men and their equipment. With very limited means of transportation and no way for that force to strike directly at Germany, a follow-up campaign in Sicily was almost the only feasible next course of action for the Allies.

The loss was a stunning strategic setback for Germany. At first, North Africa had been a rather effective economy-of-force campaign. At the risk of only three German divisions and a number of Italian divisions of questionable quality, the Axis was able to tie down a proportionately larger force and at the same time pose a significant threat to one of Britain’s strategic lines of communication. But after the defeat at El Alamein, Hitler’s sense of pride once again overcame his meager grasp of strategy, and he committed a second field army to North Africa that he could neither sustain logistically nor afford to lose. The forces Hitler threw away in May 1943 just might have made some difference for the Germans fighting in Russia or Sicily.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Tags: , ,

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 5 Comments to “World War II: North Africa Campaign”

  2. A nice summary. I would have liked to see more discussion of the intelligence aspects of the campaign. Was it ultra that alerted the British to the leak from Col. Fellers at the Cairo embassy? And was it this leak that has led to Rommel’s reputation as “the desert fox” and was he really no more than a competent and energetic commander?

    The author is a little hazy on British titles. Monty was not a knight when he took over the 8th army and I’m not sure that Gott was ever knighted. Wavell was not ennobled until the end of the war.

    Finally, an interesting bit of research still waiting to be done is whether Wavell was suffering the beginnings of dementia in 1941. Not to malign a fine soldier, but there are faint signs.

    By Jim Garner on Jul 12, 2008 at 2:50 pm

  3. My father served in the No. Africa – Moracco time line. He was with the 80th Unit Fianace Dept. I would like to know if anyone has any data on it. Some of his squad members were: Dooley:Lt. Laurendrmur??, Capt Shea, Mr. Page, Brigh, Bay, Connely, Clark. Etc. They were in Oran, Algeria, Sidi-Bel-Addis, Morocco, Brigarte,Epinal Bridge.The next old pics I found was takaen in France.These were taken in 44-45. My dad was fiance clerk: Clarence Orville Mcpherson from Alabama.RA6388657

    By Linda McPherson Harless on Mar 31, 2009 at 12:35 am

  4. I fought in North Africa with the Army Air Corps, 5th Fighter Squadron, and 52nd Fighter Wing. From Tunesia we went to Sicely, Corsica, and Italy. I still have to to live with some of the horrors of war.

    By James A. Eagle on May 2, 2009 at 12:55 pm

  5. What could have been the chances of the Axis winning the battle at El Alamein, had Montgomery not beem informed from Britain’s ultra-intercept what Rommels plans were and the supply routes?

    By Bakker on Nov 7, 2009 at 11:16 pm

  1. 1 Trackback(s)

  2. Dec 26, 2008: Who were some of history - Q&A WIKI

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

OPINION POLL

Which of these World War I aircraft was the best fighter plane?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Get Our Daily HistoryNet Email
 
 


What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us|Advertise With Us|Subscription Help