<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Unmanned Aircraft Systems replace Pilots?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/will-unmanned-aircraft-systems-replace-pilots.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/will-unmanned-aircraft-systems-replace-pilots.htm</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 07:22:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DesertHiFlyer</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/will-unmanned-aircraft-systems-replace-pilots.htm#comment-800294</link>
		<dc:creator>DesertHiFlyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 18:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13683019#comment-800294</guid>
		<description>So far, at least, it seems RPVs saved us a lot of logistics and POWs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, at least, it seems RPVs saved us a lot of logistics and POWs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Midnite</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/will-unmanned-aircraft-systems-replace-pilots.htm#comment-786362</link>
		<dc:creator>Midnite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 00:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13683019#comment-786362</guid>
		<description>Unlikely. Unmanned aircraft comes packaged complete with their own sets of weaknesses that a savvy enemy can exploit. Autonomous airplanes will only be as good as the people that program them, so their tactical flexibility in any given situation is questionable. Remote controlled aircraft are only as reliable as the signal that links them to their pilots, which suggest that the countermeasures against them might be a lot cheaper than the weapon system itself. Robotic warfare adds a new dimension to the battlefield, but I hardly think it&#039;s going to replace anything that is already on it, either in the near future or afterward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlikely. Unmanned aircraft comes packaged complete with their own sets of weaknesses that a savvy enemy can exploit. Autonomous airplanes will only be as good as the people that program them, so their tactical flexibility in any given situation is questionable. Remote controlled aircraft are only as reliable as the signal that links them to their pilots, which suggest that the countermeasures against them might be a lot cheaper than the weapon system itself. Robotic warfare adds a new dimension to the battlefield, but I hardly think it&#039;s going to replace anything that is already on it, either in the near future or afterward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krb</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/will-unmanned-aircraft-systems-replace-pilots.htm#comment-784947</link>
		<dc:creator>krb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13683019#comment-784947</guid>
		<description>I hope not.  The recent loss of that stealth spy plane proves the point...a remote pilot cannot react the same way as a pilot on site.  that would have never happened had there been a pilot onboard.  I understand it was a smallish remotely controlled aircraft, and better to lose a machine than a pilot, but no robotic aircraft will ever be able to perform at the level a manned aircraft in so far as being able to react to the situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope not.  The recent loss of that stealth spy plane proves the point&#8230;a remote pilot cannot react the same way as a pilot on site.  that would have never happened had there been a pilot onboard.  I understand it was a smallish remotely controlled aircraft, and better to lose a machine than a pilot, but no robotic aircraft will ever be able to perform at the level a manned aircraft in so far as being able to react to the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Crow</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/will-unmanned-aircraft-systems-replace-pilots.htm#comment-690528</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Crow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 16:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13683019#comment-690528</guid>
		<description>Until they can come up with a 10+ G pilot the future of atmospheric flight belongs to RPG/APG aircraft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until they can come up with a 10+ G pilot the future of atmospheric flight belongs to RPG/APG aircraft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
