| |

Wild West: Rescue of the Mountain Meadows OrphansWild West | 3 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post Brigham Young followed the federal investigation closely. In early May, he groused that Congress had appropriated $10,000 and appointed two commissioners to return the orphans to their relatives. “What an expensive and round about method for transacting what any company for the States could easily attend to at any time, and with trifling expense,” he complained. Subscribe Today
General Johnston, however, was taking no chances with the survivors’ safety, and he assigned two companies of the 2nd Dragoons to escort the orphans to Fort Leavenworth. As“an act of humanity,” the firm of Russell,Majors & Waddell (which would start the Pony Express in the spring) offered the children free transportation in their freight wagons, but Johnston provided more comfortable spring wagons. Forney hired five women to accompany the “unfortunate, fatherless, motherless, and pennyless children” and made sure they had at least three changes of clothes, plenty of blankets, and “every appliance” to “make them comfortable and happy.” Forney took two of the survivors, John Calvin Miller and Emberson Milum Tackitt, to Washington, D.C., in December 1859 to provide their “very interesting account of the massacre” to the government. The next day, Brigham Young’s Washington agent reported that Forney had given the Mormon version of the massacre and would “be of service.” Young immediately responded that if Forney continued to be a “friend of Utah,” he would not lose“his reward.” Interestingly, no record of what the two boys told federal officials survives, but even “Old Granny” had seen enough. Forney reported in September 1859 that he began his inquiries hoping to exonerate“all white men from any participation in this tragedy, and saddle the guilt exclusively on the Indians.” But it simply wasn’t so. “White men werepresent and directed the Indians,” he concluded.Forney named the “hell-deserving scoundrels whoconcocted and brought to a successful termination” the mass murder: Stake President Isaac Haight, Bishop Philip Klingensmith, Branch President John D. Lee, Bishop John Higbee and Forney’s own trusty guide, Ira Hatch. He gave their names to the attorney general, but nothing was done to bring the murderers to justice before the Civil War broke out—and nothing would be done for a dozen years. William C. Mitchell, who was an Arkansas state senator, had picked up the other 15 children, who included his granddaughters Prudence Angeline and Georgia Ann Dunlap (but not his infant grandson, who was among the dead), at Fort Leavenworth in late August 1859, and on September 15, friends and relatives gathered at Carrollton, Ark., to welcome the orphans home. According to the Arkansian, Mitchell told the crowd the children were “kept secreted by the Mormons” until Forney offered to pay a $6,000 ransom. No one who witnessed the return of the children ever forgot it. Mary Baker, whose husband Jack had died at the Meadows, took charge of her three grandchildren. “You would have thought we were heroes,” Sarah Frances “Sallie” Baker recalled in 1940. “They had a buggy parade for us.” Her grandmother gave each of the children a powerful hug. The children arrived home not long before Confederate guns opened fire at Fort Sumter, and Arkansas witnessed some of the most brutal conflict of the Civil War. Despite the turmoil, all the children found homes with relatives, who raised them as best they could. According to John D. Lee, Brigham Young said that the government took the children to St. Louis and sent letters to their relatives to come for them. “But their relations wrote back that they did not want them—that they were the children of thieves, outlaws and murderers, and they would not take them, they did not wish anything to do with them, and would not have them around their houses.” However unreliable Lee’s quote might be, a generation of Mormon historians repeated the slander that most of the children wound up in a St. Louis orphanage. Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Tags: Wild West
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
3 Comments to “Wild West: Rescue of the Mountain Meadows Orphans”
A lot for these comments are libel , although the train was in Salt Lake city, some of the men were gragging in town about their fortune ,so it was appereant that it was well known at the time, also they were bragging their involvement about the killing of Joseph Smith, and they had the rifle which was used to murder theor Prophet, all what was written was heresay and speculation which ws gathered 20 years after the fact.
By Lawrence Young on Jun 28, 2008 at 12:09 am
While the Mountain Meadows massacre was a terrible and horrifying event in the history of the Mormon saga, it is hardly the “most brutal act of religious terrorism in America history… and it would not be surpassed until a bright September morning exactly 144 years later, as airplanes filled with passengers were flown into the Pentagon and New York City’s World Trade Center” that you so crudely allege! This is a clear attempt to discredit the LDS church and Brigham Young. Your alleged “facts” are held together by myriad heresayings given by only one side of the conflict. You conveniently avoided the bravado by these “good” folks. Let us not forget the truly “most brutal act of religious terrorism in American history” was in fact issued by one Lilburn Boggs when he issued the infamous “extermination order” on the Mormons only a few years before this happened. One must remember that the Mormons had previously been hated, raped murdered and run out of their fair-gained homes by these very people by their own admission. It is not inexplicable to believe that they had had enough and when they heard this bravado by this group of travelers they over reacted. It is no doubt a terrible tradgedy and one that all of the LDS church regrets, but your silly little article is at best irresponsible. At worst it is libel.
This article does not address the facts rationally nor fairly. It is clearly and simply just another piece of rhetorical anti-mormon litterature. Comments like “mass murder and its twisted legacy” and comparisons to 9-11 are simply an attempt to play on an unsuspecting audience and are not good journalism. It is disgraceful and I am disappointed in WW for having published such a derrogitory and unfounded article.
By David Sweat on Jul 19, 2008 at 1:13 am
I was 16 years old when the 100th anniversary of the Mountain Meadow Massacre occured. My mother grew up in a Mormon family and was raised on a farm in the Myton, Utah area. When she was a girl she would listen to family talk in hushed tones of the Mountain Meadow Massacre. For sure my family knew about this incident, but every Mormon was sworn to secrecy and obeyed except to discuss it among themselves. Nothing goes further or is broadcast faster than a secret. The movie, “September Dawn” needed to be made and except for the artistic liberties it was a good movie, but terribly sad that the story has been covered up all these years. The Mormons know that it is true, and from what I have read and heard I know it to be true.
By Carol Kinman on Jul 22, 2008 at 2:47 am