| |

|
Wild West: Rescue of the Mountain Meadows Orphans
Wild West | With the orphans in tow, Forney proceeded to John D. Lee’s home in Harmony on April 22, 1859. He had learned that Lee had some of the property of the murdered emigrants in his possession and demanded that he surrender it. On the 23rd, Lee denied he had any of the property and insisted he knew nothing about it except that the Indians took it. “Lee applied some foul and indecent epithets to the emigrants,” William Rogers reported. Lee said they slandered the Mormons “and in general terms justified the killing.” Forney’s conduct while visiting Lee astounded his escort, who had refused “to share the hospitality of this notorious murderer—this scourge of the desert,” Lynch swore. He was outraged that Forney accepted Lee’s hospitality, despite the statements of the surviving children, who identified Lee as one of the killers. Lee agreed to accompany Forney to Cedar City and discuss the matter of the massacre with other Mormon officials, but on the way he rode ahead and disappeared. The leaders in Cedar City proved no more helpful in tracking down the stolen property. Frustrated and outraged, Forney’s party picked up three additional survivors and headed north with 16 orphans. Meanwhile, both the U.S. Army and Federal Judge Cradlebaugh had launched their own investigations of the murders. In mid-April, Brig. Gen. Albert Sidney Johnston, commander of the Department of Utah, ordered one company of dragoons and two of infantry to proceed to Santa Clara to protect travelers on the road to California, investigate reported Indian depredations and provide an escort for the Army paymaster who was on his way to Camp Floyd with a large supply of “spondulicks,” as Utah’s Valley Tan reported—back pay in gold, worth a rumored half-million dollars. Johnston then ordered the “Santa Clara Expedition ” to provide protection for Judge Cradlebaugh, who was on his way to investigate the crime and, if possible, arrest the murderers. As Forney marched north, Kanosh, chief of the Pahvants, informed him that some Indians had told him there were two more children saved from the massacre than Hamblin had collected. The information was not deemed very reliable, but after meeting the troops from Camp Floyd at Corn Creek, Cradlebaugh swore in William Rogers as a deputy U.S. marshal, and Forney sent him back south to see if he could find any other children. Rogers soon learned that one child was at a remote settlement named Pocketville. He sent Hamblin to recover the orphan, “a bright-eyed and rosy-cheeked boy, about two years old,” who proved to be Joseph Miller, youngest son of Joseph and Matilda Miller. Rogers “inquired diligently” for the second child but learned nothing. Despite a host of legends about a surviving child who remained in southern Utah, all reliable evidence indicates that the federal officials successfullyrecovered every surviving child. The orphans and their ages at the time of the massacre included the children of George and Manerva Baker: Mary Elizabeth, 5; Sarah Frances, 3, and William Twitty, 9 months; of Alexander and Eliza Fancher: Christopher “Kit” Carson, 5, and Triphenia D., 22 months; of Joseph and Matilda Miller: John Calvin, 6; Mary, 4, and Joseph, 1; of Jesse and Mary Dunlap: Rebecca J., 6; Louisa, 4, and Sarah Ann, 1; of Lorenzo Dow and Nancy Dunlap: Prudence Angeline, 5, and Georgia Ann, 18 months; of Peter and Saladia Huff: Nancy Saphrona, 4; of Pleasant and Armilda Tackitt: Emberson Milum, 4, and William Henry, 19 months; and of John Milum and Eloah Jones: Felix Marion, 18 months. To his credit, Forney quickly determined that “none of these children have lived among the Indians at all.” He found them “intellectual and good looking” with “not one meanlookingchild among them.” In late June 1859, the Salt Lake probate court appointed Jacob Forney guardian of the orphans with the power “to collect and receive all property belonging to the murdered Emigrants.” Forney still hoped to recover some of the wealth looted from the Arkansans, but he and his successors failed to reclaim a single nickel stolen from the Fancher party. Forney’s craven behavior with John D. Lee disgusted James Lynch, who swore out an affidavit that called the agent a “veritable old granny.” Lynch accused Forney of assisting the coverup of the crime by undercutting the authority of federal officials like Judge Cradlebaugh by arousing “a feeling of resistance to his authority among the guilty murderers.” Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Tags: Wild West
|
SPONSORED SITES
|
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 1,200 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Once A Marine | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2008 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
3 Comments to “Wild West: Rescue of the Mountain Meadows Orphans”
A lot for these comments are libel , although the train was in Salt Lake city, some of the men were gragging in town about their fortune ,so it was appereant that it was well known at the time, also they were bragging their involvement about the killing of Joseph Smith, and they had the rifle which was used to murder theor Prophet, all what was written was heresay and speculation which ws gathered 20 years after the fact.
By Lawrence Young on Jun 28, 2008 at 12:09 am
While the Mountain Meadows massacre was a terrible and horrifying event in the history of the Mormon saga, it is hardly the “most brutal act of religious terrorism in America history… and it would not be surpassed until a bright September morning exactly 144 years later, as airplanes filled with passengers were flown into the Pentagon and New York City’s World Trade Center” that you so crudely allege! This is a clear attempt to discredit the LDS church and Brigham Young. Your alleged “facts” are held together by myriad heresayings given by only one side of the conflict. You conveniently avoided the bravado by these “good” folks. Let us not forget the truly “most brutal act of religious terrorism in American history” was in fact issued by one Lilburn Boggs when he issued the infamous “extermination order” on the Mormons only a few years before this happened. One must remember that the Mormons had previously been hated, raped murdered and run out of their fair-gained homes by these very people by their own admission. It is not inexplicable to believe that they had had enough and when they heard this bravado by this group of travelers they over reacted. It is no doubt a terrible tradgedy and one that all of the LDS church regrets, but your silly little article is at best irresponsible. At worst it is libel.
This article does not address the facts rationally nor fairly. It is clearly and simply just another piece of rhetorical anti-mormon litterature. Comments like “mass murder and its twisted legacy” and comparisons to 9-11 are simply an attempt to play on an unsuspecting audience and are not good journalism. It is disgraceful and I am disappointed in WW for having published such a derrogitory and unfounded article.
By David Sweat on Jul 19, 2008 at 1:13 am
I was 16 years old when the 100th anniversary of the Mountain Meadow Massacre occured. My mother grew up in a Mormon family and was raised on a farm in the Myton, Utah area. When she was a girl she would listen to family talk in hushed tones of the Mountain Meadow Massacre. For sure my family knew about this incident, but every Mormon was sworn to secrecy and obeyed except to discuss it among themselves. Nothing goes further or is broadcast faster than a secret. The movie, “September Dawn” needed to be made and except for the artistic liberties it was a good movie, but terribly sad that the story has been covered up all these years. The Mormons know that it is true, and from what I have read and heard I know it to be true.
By Carol Kinman on Jul 22, 2008 at 2:47 am