| |

Wild West: Rescue of the Mountain Meadows OrphansWild West | Single Page | 4 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post Forney's party tried to get information as they trekked south, reaching Cedar City on April 16. "But no one professed to have any knowledge of the massacre, " Rogers recalled, "except that they had heard itwas done by the Indians." Jacob Hamblin sent IraHatch, a talented Indian interpreter who hadprobably killed at least one of the Arkansans himself,to guide the men to the scene of the massacre. Subscribe Today
"Words cannot describe the horrible picture which was here presented to us," James Lynch wrote a few months after the mid-April visit to the massacre site. What he and the others saw in this beautiful alpine valley would haunt them to their graves: "Human skeletons, disjointed bones, ghastly skulls and the hair of women were scattered in frightful profusion over a distance of two miles." The men found three mounds, evidence of "the careless attempt that had been made to bury the unfortunate victims." In a ravine by the side of the road, "a large number of leg and arm bones, and also skulls, could be seen sticking above the surface, as if they had been buried there," Rogers reported. They spent several hours burying a few of the exposed remains. "When I first passed through the place," Rogers later wrote, "I could walk for near a mile on bones, and skulls laying grinning at you, and women and children's hair in bunches as big as a bushel." The bones of children were lying by those of grown persons, "as if parent and child had met death at the same instant and with the same stroke." Lynch could not forget seeing the remains of those innocent victims of"avarice, fanatacism and cruelty," adding, "I have witnessed many harrowing sights on the fields of battle, but never did my heart thrill with such horrible emotions." The day after visiting Mountain Meadows, Forney and his escort reached the Mormon settlement at Santa Clara, where they found 13 of the surviving children in the custody of Hamblin, who was just beginning his legendary career as a frontiersman and Indian interpreter for explorers such as John Wesley Powell. In his recollections, Lynch claimed he and a few men might have been sent ahead in disguise to find the children and determine what kind of reception awaited Forney. Fifty years later, Lynch remembered that Hamblin claimed some of the children were being held captive by the Indians. "Produce them or we will kill you," Lynch recalled saying while pistols and rifles were pointed at Hamblin's head. "He surrendered." (It's a wonderful story, but none of the contemporary reports— including that by Lynch—tell it.) After Forney arrived, the men spent three days at Santa Clara while clothing was made forthe children. Eyewitnesses gave contradictory reports about the circumstances of the rescued children."The children when we firstsaw them were in a mostwretched and deplorable condition," James Lynch charged,"with little or no clothing, coveredwith fillth and dirt, theypresented a sight heart-rendingand miserable in the extreme."U.S. Army Major James Carletonsaid their captors "keptthese little ones barely alive."In contrast, William Rogersreported that all the childrenhad sore eyes but were otherwisewell, and Jacob Forneybelieved the children were wellcared for. He found them"happy and contented, exceptthose who were sick" andinsisted the orphans were inbetter condition than most ofthe children in the settlementsin which they lived. Forney rejected a number of obviously fraudulent claims to repay ransoms allegedly paid to save the children, since it was well known that the children "did not live among the Indians one hour." He received other claims for the children's support and indignantly reported he would not "condescend to become the medium of even transmitting such claims"; however, he later authorized $2,961.77 to pay for the cost of the children's care. Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Tags: Wild West
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Copyright © 2010 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
4 Comments to “Wild West: Rescue of the Mountain Meadows Orphans”
A lot for these comments are libel , although the train was in Salt Lake city, some of the men were gragging in town about their fortune ,so it was appereant that it was well known at the time, also they were bragging their involvement about the killing of Joseph Smith, and they had the rifle which was used to murder theor Prophet, all what was written was heresay and speculation which ws gathered 20 years after the fact.
By Lawrence Young on Jun 28, 2008 at 12:09 am
While the Mountain Meadows massacre was a terrible and horrifying event in the history of the Mormon saga, it is hardly the "most brutal act of religious terrorism in America history… and it would not be surpassed until a bright September morning exactly 144 years later, as airplanes filled with passengers were flown into the Pentagon and New York City’s World Trade Center" that you so crudely allege! This is a clear attempt to discredit the LDS church and Brigham Young. Your alleged "facts" are held together by myriad heresayings given by only one side of the conflict. You conveniently avoided the bravado by these "good" folks. Let us not forget the truly "most brutal act of religious terrorism in American history" was in fact issued by one Lilburn Boggs when he issued the infamous "extermination order" on the Mormons only a few years before this happened. One must remember that the Mormons had previously been hated, raped murdered and run out of their fair-gained homes by these very people by their own admission. It is not inexplicable to believe that they had had enough and when they heard this bravado by this group of travelers they over reacted. It is no doubt a terrible tradgedy and one that all of the LDS church regrets, but your silly little article is at best irresponsible. At worst it is libel.
This article does not address the facts rationally nor fairly. It is clearly and simply just another piece of rhetorical anti-mormon litterature. Comments like "mass murder and its twisted legacy" and comparisons to 9-11 are simply an attempt to play on an unsuspecting audience and are not good journalism. It is disgraceful and I am disappointed in WW for having published such a derrogitory and unfounded article.
By David Sweat on Jul 19, 2008 at 1:13 am
I was 16 years old when the 100th anniversary of the Mountain Meadow Massacre occured. My mother grew up in a Mormon family and was raised on a farm in the Myton, Utah area. When she was a girl she would listen to family talk in hushed tones of the Mountain Meadow Massacre. For sure my family knew about this incident, but every Mormon was sworn to secrecy and obeyed except to discuss it among themselves. Nothing goes further or is broadcast faster than a secret. The movie, "September Dawn" needed to be made and except for the artistic liberties it was a good movie, but terribly sad that the story has been covered up all these years. The Mormons know that it is true, and from what I have read and heard I know it to be true.
By Carol Kinman on Jul 22, 2008 at 2:47 am
i need help…… anybody have any good websites that have info. on jedediah smith…
By dylan on Feb 16, 2010 at 11:32 am