HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

Wild West: Rescue of the Mountain Meadows Orphans

Wild West  | 3 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

Yet their youth did not prevent the orphans from leaving behind some of the most compelling accounts of what actually happened on that black Friday. “The scenes and incidents of the massacre were so terrible that they were indelibly stamped on my mind, notwithstanding I was so young at the time,” Nancy Huff Cates recalled in 1875. The tale of how a hard-bitten crew of colorful frontiersmen rescued these sad orphans is one of the great, untold stories of the American West.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to Wild West magazine

The first news of the worst massacre in the history of the Oregon and California trails appeared in the Los Angeles Star on October 3, 1857. Several children, it reported, “were picked up on the ground, and were being conveyed to San Bernardino.” A week later, that newspaper said the Indians saved 15 “infant children” and sold them to the Mormons at Cedar City. By the end of the year, word of the murders had reached the families of the victims in northwest Arkansas, where an angry citizen asked if the government would send enough men to Utah “to hang all the scoundrels and thieves at once, and give them the same play they give our women and children?”

William C. Mitchell’s married daughter, Nancy Dunlap, had been with the so-called Fancher party, as had a married son, Charles, and an unmarried son, Joel. Mitchell wrote to Senator W.K. Sebastian, chairman of the Committee on Indian Affairs, expressing his hope that an infant grandson had survived. He asked Sebastian to investigate: “I must have satisfaction for the inhuman manner in which they have slain my children,” he wrote,“together with two brothers-in-law and seventeenof their children.” Many of the murdered emigrantscame from powerful Arkansas families. InFebruary 1858, the “deeply aggrieved” people ofCarroll County in northwest Arkansas petitioned Congress to appropriate funds to reclaim andreturn the children saved from the massacre.

Utah was still in a virtual state of rebellion, however, and not long after the massacre Mormon guerrillas had burned Army supply trains on the way to the territory. The government could do nothing much until June 1858, after Brigham Young’s hoped-for alliance with the Indians collapsed and the “Mormon Revolt” fizzled. Young grudgingly accepted a blanket pardon for treason and allowed the new governor and federal judges into the territory. That same month the U.S. Army established the nation’s largest military station at Camp Floyd, 40 miles from Salt Lake City. Alfred Cumming replaced Young as governor, and Jacob Forney took over as Indian superintendent. One of their first priorities was to locate the Mountain Meadows orphans and “use every effort to get possession” of them, as Washington had first orderedForney to do back in March.

Jacob Hamblin, the president of the Mormon Southern Indian Mission, met with Brigham Young in June and told Young “everything” about the murders, including that whites were involved. Young told him, “Don’t say anything about it,” and Hamblin loyally continued to blame the massacre on the Indians. Hamblin told Forney that 15 of the survivors were living near his ranch with white families. With considerable effort, Hamblin claimed, the children had been “recovered, bought and otherwise, from the Indians.” Forney hoped to go south in a month to recover the children, but he put off the job for almost a year, although he didtell Hamblin to collect the children.

In early August, Young sent orders to Isaac Haight and William Dame, religious leaders in southern Utah (and the same men who had given the direct orders to massacre the Arkansans). He told them to have Hamblin“gather up those children that were saved from theIndian Masacre [sic].” Forney also sent orders toHamblin, “All the children must be secured, at anycost or sacrifice, whether among whites or Indians.” He instructed Hamblin to take the childreninto his family. “You will be well compensated forall the trouble you and Mrs. Hamblin will have,”Forney promised.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Tags:

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 3 Comments to “Wild West: Rescue of the Mountain Meadows Orphans”

  2. A lot for these comments are libel , although the train was in Salt Lake city, some of the men were gragging in town about their fortune ,so it was appereant that it was well known at the time, also they were bragging their involvement about the killing of Joseph Smith, and they had the rifle which was used to murder theor Prophet, all what was written was heresay and speculation which ws gathered 20 years after the fact.

    By Lawrence Young on Jun 28, 2008 at 12:09 am

  3. While the Mountain Meadows massacre was a terrible and horrifying event in the history of the Mormon saga, it is hardly the “most brutal act of religious terrorism in America history… and it would not be surpassed until a bright September morning exactly 144 years later, as airplanes filled with passengers were flown into the Pentagon and New York City’s World Trade Center” that you so crudely allege! This is a clear attempt to discredit the LDS church and Brigham Young. Your alleged “facts” are held together by myriad heresayings given by only one side of the conflict. You conveniently avoided the bravado by these “good” folks. Let us not forget the truly “most brutal act of religious terrorism in American history” was in fact issued by one Lilburn Boggs when he issued the infamous “extermination order” on the Mormons only a few years before this happened. One must remember that the Mormons had previously been hated, raped murdered and run out of their fair-gained homes by these very people by their own admission. It is not inexplicable to believe that they had had enough and when they heard this bravado by this group of travelers they over reacted. It is no doubt a terrible tradgedy and one that all of the LDS church regrets, but your silly little article is at best irresponsible. At worst it is libel.
    This article does not address the facts rationally nor fairly. It is clearly and simply just another piece of rhetorical anti-mormon litterature. Comments like “mass murder and its twisted legacy” and comparisons to 9-11 are simply an attempt to play on an unsuspecting audience and are not good journalism. It is disgraceful and I am disappointed in WW for having published such a derrogitory and unfounded article.

    By David Sweat on Jul 19, 2008 at 1:13 am

  4. I was 16 years old when the 100th anniversary of the Mountain Meadow Massacre occured. My mother grew up in a Mormon family and was raised on a farm in the Myton, Utah area. When she was a girl she would listen to family talk in hushed tones of the Mountain Meadow Massacre. For sure my family knew about this incident, but every Mormon was sworn to secrecy and obeyed except to discuss it among themselves. Nothing goes further or is broadcast faster than a secret. The movie, “September Dawn” needed to be made and except for the artistic liberties it was a good movie, but terribly sad that the story has been covered up all these years. The Mormons know that it is true, and from what I have read and heard I know it to be true.

    By Carol Kinman on Jul 22, 2008 at 2:47 am

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

OPINION POLL

Which of these World War I aircraft was the best fighter plane?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Get Our Daily HistoryNet Email
 
 


What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us|Advertise With Us|Subscription Help