Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link Weider History Group RSS feed Weider Subscriptions Historynet Home page

Wild West Discussion - February 2010

Published Online: December 16, 2009 
Print Friendly
2 comments FONT +  FONT -

Wild horses are viewed by some people as living symbols of the Wild West and by others as nuisances, as the mustangs compete with livestock on the open range. What do you think of the Bureau of Land Management policy of keeping a set number of mustangs in the wild, while placing the remainder in holding pens and putting them up for adoption?


2 Responses to “Wild West Discussion - February 2010”


  1. 1
    len says:

    A reading of Howard Zinn's "people's history of United States" re-enforces this idea, If all people are thinking the same, there is NO thinking. greg michno is a member of a culture that seems unable or unwilling to go beyond what mommy an daddy told him and cannot relate to any other people save those who "think" the same as he does.

  2. 2
    Steve McCarty says:

    I live in Oregon. From here they send out animal lovers to round up the mustangs. They get several hundred a season. Most are in pretty poor condition, but they do hold auctions. The animals usually sell for $150 or so.

    People who love animals buy them and put them in their back yard, thinging they will become pets, like the family mutt. Not so. Horses to be properly cared for are expensive to maintain. One owner ordered an employee to take out out back and shoot it. So the young fellow did, using his 9mm pistol. After the horse came to, it wandered off and was discovered starving and blind in one eye. The found the owner and tried the shooter. Animal cruelty. He was sentence to five years in prison, as I recall.

    Other people just turn the horses out, and being alone, they starve. Some just keep them in the pen and starve them to death.

    Morale of the story? They were probably better off on the open range. They don't really compete for forage. You seen them in the desert where there are no cattle. There are also donkey's out there. Some of the horses are Kiger Mustangs which are a unique breed of wild Oregon horses. They IMO should be left out there, as they have been for 500 years. They are some of the purest Spanish stock brought over here by the Conquistadores extant.

    Left on their own hook the wild horses survive for a few years and starve. Brought in they live for two or three years and then starve. What's the diff?



Leave a Reply

Related Articles


History Net Images Spacer
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer
HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Which of these nonfiction books had the most significant effect on American society?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer History net Spacer
STAY CONNECTED WITH US
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer

What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer!
Today in History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | History Forums

Copyright © 2012 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy