<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why No Poison Gas?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/why-no-poison-gas.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/why-no-poison-gas.htm</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:21:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Snow</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/why-no-poison-gas.htm#comment-903325</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Snow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681721#comment-903325</guid>
		<description>I have been helping WWII Veterans file medical claims. The hardest one was exposure to Mustard Gas. The VA has a central file location for vets exposed to Mustard Gas. Trying to work with these people is VERY DIFFICULT.

I also do WWII research and here is what I know as fact. The US Liberty Ship John Harvey was loaded with canisters of Mustard Gas and being positioned if needed to push/kill the Germans from Italy. Documentation shows that Allies believed the Germans already positioned their Mustard Gas there. The US John Harvey entered the Port of Bari under British control. Only two men on board the US John Harvey knew the gas was there and the British Harbor Master was also aware of the cargo. Not only was the harbor full with ships to be unloaded, other ships were anchored outside the harbor. 

Because of its cargo the US John Harvey was moved up on the list to the number #3 slot to be unloaded. Research shows that a British LT (doctor) is the person who figured out why the US John Henry blew sky high and why so many men died on the ships on either side. He wanted to know why so many military and citizens of the village were ill. After examining soldiers in the hospital he went and spoke to those men who were still alive and reported to the Harbor Master. They told him what the manifest said. He then took this information and his diagram to his Commanding Officer and reported what he had discovered. The next day this doctor was gone, never to be heard from again. Churchill immediately sealed all information about this and convinced Eisenhower to do the same. They did not want the world to know about the Allies willingness to use gas if necessary. 

Recently two Doctors have made public what soldiers were exposed to and how those still alive suffer.  One is from the CDC and the other is a US Army doctor with a specialty in Toxicology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been helping WWII Veterans file medical claims. The hardest one was exposure to Mustard Gas. The VA has a central file location for vets exposed to Mustard Gas. Trying to work with these people is VERY DIFFICULT.</p>
<p>I also do WWII research and here is what I know as fact. The US Liberty Ship John Harvey was loaded with canisters of Mustard Gas and being positioned if needed to push/kill the Germans from Italy. Documentation shows that Allies believed the Germans already positioned their Mustard Gas there. The US John Harvey entered the Port of Bari under British control. Only two men on board the US John Harvey knew the gas was there and the British Harbor Master was also aware of the cargo. Not only was the harbor full with ships to be unloaded, other ships were anchored outside the harbor. </p>
<p>Because of its cargo the US John Harvey was moved up on the list to the number #3 slot to be unloaded. Research shows that a British LT (doctor) is the person who figured out why the US John Henry blew sky high and why so many men died on the ships on either side. He wanted to know why so many military and citizens of the village were ill. After examining soldiers in the hospital he went and spoke to those men who were still alive and reported to the Harbor Master. They told him what the manifest said. He then took this information and his diagram to his Commanding Officer and reported what he had discovered. The next day this doctor was gone, never to be heard from again. Churchill immediately sealed all information about this and convinced Eisenhower to do the same. They did not want the world to know about the Allies willingness to use gas if necessary. </p>
<p>Recently two Doctors have made public what soldiers were exposed to and how those still alive suffer.  One is from the CDC and the other is a US Army doctor with a specialty in Toxicology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Laurence Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/why-no-poison-gas.htm#comment-817796</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Laurence Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681721#comment-817796</guid>
		<description>Hitler says very clearly in Mein Kampf that he would never use Mustard Gas because of fear of retaliation from the enemy. --D. Laurence Rogers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitler says very clearly in Mein Kampf that he would never use Mustard Gas because of fear of retaliation from the enemy. &#8211;D. Laurence Rogers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letter To The Faroes &#171; ovisarie</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/why-no-poison-gas.htm#comment-813534</link>
		<dc:creator>Letter To The Faroes &#171; ovisarie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681721#comment-813534</guid>
		<description>[...] Frank A Churchill [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Frank A Churchill [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RAW</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/why-no-poison-gas.htm#comment-787661</link>
		<dc:creator>RAW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681721#comment-787661</guid>
		<description>correction:   The SS John Harvey was loaded w/ mustard gas bombs and was destroyed at BARI, Italy:&quot;The Second Pearl Harbor&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>correction:   The SS John Harvey was loaded w/ mustard gas bombs and was destroyed at BARI, Italy:&#034;The Second Pearl Harbor&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/why-no-poison-gas.htm#comment-781629</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 01:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681721#comment-781629</guid>
		<description>These Germans on this blog kill me. After all these years they still stick up for Hitler. Hitler was a madman and the Germans that tried to kill him that&#039;s who you should stick up for. Meanwhile the officers that tried get called traitors.  Typical German pride</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These Germans on this blog kill me. After all these years they still stick up for Hitler. Hitler was a madman and the Germans that tried to kill him that&#039;s who you should stick up for. Meanwhile the officers that tried get called traitors.  Typical German pride</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/why-no-poison-gas.htm#comment-781627</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 01:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681721#comment-781627</guid>
		<description>So that proves the point right there the axis didn&#039;t use chemical weapons because they would have them used on them. That&#039;s the most logical answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that proves the point right there the axis didn&#039;t use chemical weapons because they would have them used on them. That&#039;s the most logical answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The main reason of why Nazis lost the War??? - Page 4</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/why-no-poison-gas.htm#comment-780618</link>
		<dc:creator>The main reason of why Nazis lost the War??? - Page 4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 18:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681721#comment-780618</guid>
		<description>[...] link to a very short article on the subject which was posted online in the WW2 Magazine.   Goto:   Why No Poison Gas?       Happy Trails, Clint.        Reply With [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] link to a very short article on the subject which was posted online in the WW2 Magazine.   Goto:   Why No Poison Gas?       Happy Trails, Clint.        Reply With [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sagesource</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/why-no-poison-gas.htm#comment-454627</link>
		<dc:creator>sagesource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 09:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681721#comment-454627</guid>
		<description>That was mustard gas, a vesicant, or blistering agent. It has horrifying effects against unprotected victims (many of whom drown when huge blisters form and burst in their lungs), but is pretty useless against trained troops. My father was in World War I on a machine-gun crew with 3rd Division of the Canadian Army and he thought that gas was no more than a nuisance weapon, even though he went through some very heavy attacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was mustard gas, a vesicant, or blistering agent. It has horrifying effects against unprotected victims (many of whom drown when huge blisters form and burst in their lungs), but is pretty useless against trained troops. My father was in World War I on a machine-gun crew with 3rd Division of the Canadian Army and he thought that gas was no more than a nuisance weapon, even though he went through some very heavy attacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sagesource</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/why-no-poison-gas.htm#comment-454623</link>
		<dc:creator>sagesource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 09:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681721#comment-454623</guid>
		<description>The V-weapons did tie up very considerable amounts of Allied weapons in countering them -- shooting down V1s and attacking V1 and V2 launch sites. But the V-weapons could only be aimed in a very approximate way. They could not have been used to establish a useful concentration of gas in an area, and the V2, which hit at faster than the speed of sound, might not have been usable for gas delivery at all (unless you believe that gassing the English subsoil was a worthy endeavor). The V1, for its part, was a noisy beast that would have taken very few people by surprise and so would have been largely ineffective as a delivery means for gas.

There was nothing the Germans could have done for themselves at that point in the war anyway. The failure to take Britain out virtually guaranteed their eventual loss, and the twin insanities of attacking the USSR and declaring war on the United States meant that the inevitable would come quickly rather than slowly. Gas wouldn&#039;t have done them any good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The V-weapons did tie up very considerable amounts of Allied weapons in countering them &#8212; shooting down V1s and attacking V1 and V2 launch sites. But the V-weapons could only be aimed in a very approximate way. They could not have been used to establish a useful concentration of gas in an area, and the V2, which hit at faster than the speed of sound, might not have been usable for gas delivery at all (unless you believe that gassing the English subsoil was a worthy endeavor). The V1, for its part, was a noisy beast that would have taken very few people by surprise and so would have been largely ineffective as a delivery means for gas.</p>
<p>There was nothing the Germans could have done for themselves at that point in the war anyway. The failure to take Britain out virtually guaranteed their eventual loss, and the twin insanities of attacking the USSR and declaring war on the United States meant that the inevitable would come quickly rather than slowly. Gas wouldn&#039;t have done them any good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sagesource</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/why-no-poison-gas.htm#comment-454621</link>
		<dc:creator>sagesource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 09:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681721#comment-454621</guid>
		<description>The idea that Hitler was &quot;eco-friendly&quot; is a bad joke at best. He had a certain glutinous sentimentality about animals common among fascists, but that was about it. His lack of interest in atomic weaponry was driven not by love of the Earth but by his racism -- he thought that nuclear research was &quot;Jewish science.&quot; On top of that, Speer sabotaged the German nuclear program by releasing German stocks of uranium to be used in anti-tank ammunition in place of tungsten (much as it is used today). Or perhaps &quot;sabotaged&quot; is a bad word. Speer was merely being realistic. Germany did not have nearly the industrial reserves needed to make an atom bomb -- at that point in time, such reserves could only be found in the United States. There would never have been a German atomic bomb under any circumstances whatsoever, and that fact has nothing to do with Hitler&#039;s presumed &quot;greenness.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea that Hitler was &#034;eco-friendly&#034; is a bad joke at best. He had a certain glutinous sentimentality about animals common among fascists, but that was about it. His lack of interest in atomic weaponry was driven not by love of the Earth but by his racism &#8212; he thought that nuclear research was &#034;Jewish science.&#034; On top of that, Speer sabotaged the German nuclear program by releasing German stocks of uranium to be used in anti-tank ammunition in place of tungsten (much as it is used today). Or perhaps &#034;sabotaged&#034; is a bad word. Speer was merely being realistic. Germany did not have nearly the industrial reserves needed to make an atom bomb &#8212; at that point in time, such reserves could only be found in the United States. There would never have been a German atomic bomb under any circumstances whatsoever, and that fact has nothing to do with Hitler&#039;s presumed &#034;greenness.&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
