![]() |
||
![]() |
||
6 Responses to “What made Kelly Johnson such a successful airplane designer?”Leave a Reply
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
|
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer! Copyright © 2012 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
What amazes me about the design team at the "Skunk Works" didn't have computers and other technologies we have today. Yet they were able to design and build innovative aircraft with advanced technology and were able to do it in a remarkably short time. I wonder if such men and women exist today?
Sirs: I think that Kelly was a genius in his on right, but was smart enough to surround himself with very intelligent and free thinking engineers. Together thay made a team unmatched in building the ultimate planes. Though he made many enemies in the pentagon he still would not let them dictate to him. This in turn kept all the egg heads like McNamara away from him. Very few men are as he was, strong willed and refused to be cowed by power and money. Thanks
STYLE !!!!
The Steve Jobs of the aerospace industry.
No Robin, Steve Jobs was the Kelly Johnson of the consumer IT industry
Kelly had a philosophy of risk and reward, AKA Biblical faith. He rejected committees. "Working within the safety of committees you may avoid utter failure but you will also avoid utter success". Unlike men who are phenoms almost by accident, Kelly could articulate this and meant he understood the concept, quietly and deliberately managing his achievements without committees as part of his genius.
D Branson is correct. Johnson made a point of getting the very smart and "out of the box" thinking people around him.
When the foolish Canadian gover't killed the Avro ARROW project and laid off the brilliant engineers, Johnson and NASA divided the spoils. Johnson hired many of those Canadians whose thinking was far ahead of their time.
To this day top edge Canadian talent is recognozed in the USA before it is in Canada.