<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is considered to be the best overall fighter of World War II?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/what-is-considered-to-be-the-best-overall-fighter-of-world-war-ii.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/what-is-considered-to-be-the-best-overall-fighter-of-world-war-ii.htm</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:56:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: G Mullen</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/what-is-considered-to-be-the-best-overall-fighter-of-world-war-ii.htm#comment-835820</link>
		<dc:creator>G Mullen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13687060#comment-835820</guid>
		<description>I would agree with the Mustang but only after it had been fitted with the Rolls-Royce Merlin engine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree with the Mustang but only after it had been fitted with the Rolls-Royce Merlin engine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macmn</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/what-is-considered-to-be-the-best-overall-fighter-of-world-war-ii.htm#comment-834338</link>
		<dc:creator>macmn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 20:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13687060#comment-834338</guid>
		<description>Sorry Mike, I have to disagree. The Spit didn&#039;t have the speed, endurance or firepower the Mustang did. Or for that matter the P-38 or the Jug. .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Mike, I have to disagree. The Spit didn&#039;t have the speed, endurance or firepower the Mustang did. Or for that matter the P-38 or the Jug. .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Davies</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/what-is-considered-to-be-the-best-overall-fighter-of-world-war-ii.htm#comment-833881</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 13:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13687060#comment-833881</guid>
		<description>For my money it&#039;s the Supermarine Spitfire. In production at the outset of the war and after its conclusion. Unequalled as an air superiority fighter  at all altitudes across different marks it also shone as a photo reccie and fighter bomber and served on aircraft carriers with equal distinction. A testament  to the old adage &quot;if it looks right it is right&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For my money it&#039;s the Supermarine Spitfire. In production at the outset of the war and after its conclusion. Unequalled as an air superiority fighter  at all altitudes across different marks it also shone as a photo reccie and fighter bomber and served on aircraft carriers with equal distinction. A testament  to the old adage &#034;if it looks right it is right&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
