<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weaponry: The Rifle-Musket and the Mini&#233; Ball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/weaponry-the-rifle-musket-and-the-mini-ball.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/weaponry-the-rifle-musket-and-the-mini-ball.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=weaponry-the-rifle-musket-and-the-mini-ball</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:15:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/weaponry-the-rifle-musket-and-the-mini-ball.htm#comment-788686</link>
		<dc:creator>melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-788686</guid>
		<description>How much would a musket minie ball be worth today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much would a musket minie ball be worth today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/weaponry-the-rifle-musket-and-the-mini-ball.htm#comment-788113</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-788113</guid>
		<description>I was metal-detecting in Kentucky near my home and found a lead sabot. It was about 8-10 inches deep. I do not know if it is modern or old. It is in very good condition. Is it possible to send pics of it to you or anyone that could tell me anything about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was metal-detecting in Kentucky near my home and found a lead sabot. It was about 8-10 inches deep. I do not know if it is modern or old. It is in very good condition. Is it possible to send pics of it to you or anyone that could tell me anything about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/weaponry-the-rifle-musket-and-the-mini-ball.htm#comment-782148</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-782148</guid>
		<description>BillG, I&#039;m sure their accuracy would have been much higher if they didn&#039;t have people trying to kill them also with guns and cannon fire going off around them. I have never had anyone shoot a gun at me in a deliberate intent of trying to kill me, but I suspect that such an environment isn&#039;t ideal for accuracy. Something perhaps to keep in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BillG, I&#039;m sure their accuracy would have been much higher if they didn&#039;t have people trying to kill them also with guns and cannon fire going off around them. I have never had anyone shoot a gun at me in a deliberate intent of trying to kill me, but I suspect that such an environment isn&#039;t ideal for accuracy. Something perhaps to keep in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/weaponry-the-rifle-musket-and-the-mini-ball.htm#comment-780354</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 02:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-780354</guid>
		<description>Great article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheOneThatComments</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/weaponry-the-rifle-musket-and-the-mini-ball.htm#comment-779988</link>
		<dc:creator>TheOneThatComments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-779988</guid>
		<description>You guys are crazy! This article was amazing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are crazy! This article was amazing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/weaponry-the-rifle-musket-and-the-mini-ball.htm#comment-779017</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-779017</guid>
		<description>There are two reasons for the really low, &quot;hit rates&quot;. Neither is the fault of the weapon.   First, the average Civil war officer did not see much value in target practice and there was no such thing as &quot;qualifying&quot; as the term is used today.   At 100 fpm, you have a pretty high ark, so a lot of practice is necessary to hit at various ranges.   The second problem is combat stress.  In one study, a group of expert marksmen, using modern weapons fired while a number of tennis ball thrower machienes were &quot;returning fire&quot;.  Their accuracy dropped to about 25% of non stressed accuracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two reasons for the really low, &#034;hit rates&#034;. Neither is the fault of the weapon.   First, the average Civil war officer did not see much value in target practice and there was no such thing as &#034;qualifying&#034; as the term is used today.   At 100 fpm, you have a pretty high ark, so a lot of practice is necessary to hit at various ranges.   The second problem is combat stress.  In one study, a group of expert marksmen, using modern weapons fired while a number of tennis ball thrower machienes were &#034;returning fire&#034;.  Their accuracy dropped to about 25% of non stressed accuracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill G</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/weaponry-the-rifle-musket-and-the-mini-ball.htm#comment-662661</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-662661</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that the actual accuracy of the civil war rifled musket and mini ball is atrocious.  200k KIA out of how man tens of millions of shots fired?  A Union sharpshooter was required to shoot 5&quot; groups at 200 yards.  With a conservative 4 RPM a competent sharpshooter would have at least 7 shots at an advancing enemy, the last 3 from within 75 yards.  It seems like 4-5 hits would be likely, especially when firing from behind a stone wall to act as a rifle rest.

The hundreds of men of the famed 20th Maine inflicted less than 1 casualty per (Kia and wounded) in 2 hours of fighting off repeated assaults.  If just 10% of their shots fired from 50 yards or less hit the Alabaman&#039;s casualties would have been far greater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that the actual accuracy of the civil war rifled musket and mini ball is atrocious.  200k KIA out of how man tens of millions of shots fired?  A Union sharpshooter was required to shoot 5&#034; groups at 200 yards.  With a conservative 4 RPM a competent sharpshooter would have at least 7 shots at an advancing enemy, the last 3 from within 75 yards.  It seems like 4-5 hits would be likely, especially when firing from behind a stone wall to act as a rifle rest.</p>
<p>The hundreds of men of the famed 20th Maine inflicted less than 1 casualty per (Kia and wounded) in 2 hours of fighting off repeated assaults.  If just 10% of their shots fired from 50 yards or less hit the Alabaman&#039;s casualties would have been far greater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Young</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/weaponry-the-rifle-musket-and-the-mini-ball.htm#comment-331254</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 00:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-331254</guid>
		<description>Thank for a great explantion that is too often ignored by other writers.  It would be even better if it were accompanied by photos of the paper cartridges carried during at period together with drawn illustrations..  

I have read elsewhere that civil war soldiers oftens moisted minie bullets in their mouths before loading and that the British packed them in grease.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank for a great explantion that is too often ignored by other writers.  It would be even better if it were accompanied by photos of the paper cartridges carried during at period together with drawn illustrations..  </p>
<p>I have read elsewhere that civil war soldiers oftens moisted minie bullets in their mouths before loading and that the British packed them in grease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meh Summers</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/weaponry-the-rifle-musket-and-the-mini-ball.htm#comment-66018</link>
		<dc:creator>Meh Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 23:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-66018</guid>
		<description>wow this was not even helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow this was not even helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Boatwright</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/weaponry-the-rifle-musket-and-the-mini-ball.htm#comment-1675</link>
		<dc:creator>James Boatwright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1675</guid>
		<description>Lt. General Nathan Bedford Forrest (CSA) had not gone to West Point (or to ANY educational institution higher than possibly the 8th grade), and so did not know the &quot;correct&quot; way to fight a battle.
He DID know that frontal charges were mostly useless --- he would rather take the time to attack from the flank, or, hopefully (taking a little longer), from his enemies&#039; REAR --- as at Brice&#039;s Cross Roads.

Thank you,

James Boatwright</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lt. General Nathan Bedford Forrest (CSA) had not gone to West Point (or to ANY educational institution higher than possibly the 8th grade), and so did not know the &#034;correct&#034; way to fight a battle.<br />
He DID know that frontal charges were mostly useless &#8212; he would rather take the time to attack from the flank, or, hopefully (taking a little longer), from his enemies&#039; REAR &#8212; as at Brice&#039;s Cross Roads.</p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>James Boatwright</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

