http://www.historynet.com/we-shall-remain-interview-with-ric-burns-and-chris-eyre.htm From the World's Largest History Magazine Publisher Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:48:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://www.historynet.com/we-shall-remain-interview-with-ric-burns-and-chris-eyre.htm#comment-64796 Antonio Pantanelli Sun, 24 May 2009 10:22:31 +0000 http://www.historynet.com/?p=13680974#comment-64796 I wrote (in my poor English) to the Pres. Barack Obama about a new interpretation to give to Tecumseh's history and his Correspondence Team answered appreciating hearing from me. "The Pres. has promised the most transparent administration in history, and we are committed to listening to and responding you...so we encourage you to resubmit your message" to a new link they gave me because the former receives "millions of electronic messages". The matter of my work is: "Why did not USA recognize Tecumseh's right to form a native, independent nation ?" He said to Harrison that "the US had set him the example of forming a strict union amongst all the fires that compose their confederacy...the Indians did not complain of it - nor should his white brothers complain of him doing the same with regard to the Indian tribes...they really meant nothing but peace" He alone had expanded a political program upon two simple principles which were very baneful for Jefferson, Madison, Harrison, Jackson...Reagan, Bush: 1) He wanted all the Indian tribes join together in order to form their confederation and to stop the American encroachments 2) the Indian land was not to be owned by a single tribe but it could be sold to USA only if all the tribes agreed: that is never more. If US had peaceflly agreed, recognized Indians' rights and stop any more invasion or encroachment upon their land, was there any reason to a war between them? Harrison said: "(The Indians) will never have recourse to arms unless riven to it by a series of injustice and oppression." But he after having drawn Tecumseh as "One of the uncommon geniouses which springs up occasionally to produce revolutions and overturn the established order of things" (the order of things the US wanted establish on the Indians, like as the Relocation west of Mississipi - to be read 'an Ethnic Cleansing') he wrote also the next words to the War Department. "If it not were for the vicinity of the US he would perhaps be the founder of an empire that rival in glory Mexico and Peru...He is now upon the last round to put a finishing stroke to his work. I hope however before his return that that part of work which he considered complete will be demolished and even its founadtion rooted up." "Before his return". Harrison knew very well that Tecumseh alone was and had the political structure of Tippecanoe: the Governor crossed up the line North of which the Indians owned their legal land just because he relied on the provoked honor of the tribesmen to obtain on Nov. 11, 1811 the kind of answer the Shawnee chief had strongly forbidden them from giving. Why a sculptured portrait of Tecumseh is among other portraits of men who made great the US in one of the Power Palaces in Washington D.C.? Why the brochure given at the Tippecanoe Memorial says of him "as both a great Indian and a great American"? Not only he fought the US all over his life for the Indian freedom, but the US fought him and his free, united native Nation till to their death. The brochure: "The Americans fought for a dream...of a great land of free men. The Indian fought for the same land, his happy hunting ground on earth'...'Tippecanoe Monument...righty honors the brave soldiers and Indians that died here. Today freedom prevails in America...the heritage of all that fought here'...'Jefferson wanted the Indian lands for America, he planned to buy land from whichever tribe owned it...he would train the braves to farm and be content without the vast land they had neede as hunters." So the Indians were so savages that were not able to fight for their freedom: only the Americans could do it; and the freedom for the Indians was to be deported more and more to West: Alexis de Tocqueville (an admirer of the newborn Republic) nevertheless wrote that the Americans would have joined the Indians where they be gone into 'ten years'. But did not the Declaration of Independence proclaim these words which are immortal and applicable to each man, to each people: "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all the men are created equal...endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights...Life, Liberty, pursuit of Happiness..."? Words written a few years before Tippecanoe... I wrote (in my poor English) to the Pres. Barack Obama about a new interpretation to give to Tecumseh's history and his Correspondence Team answered appreciating hearing from me. "The Pres. has promised the most transparent administration in history, and we are committed to listening to and responding you…so we encourage you to resubmit your message" to a new link they gave me because the former receives "millions of electronic messages". The matter of my work is: "Why did not USA recognize Tecumseh's right to form a native, independent nation ?" He said to Harrison that "the US had set him the example of forming a strict union amongst all the fires that compose their confederacy…the Indians did not complain of it – nor should his white brothers complain of him doing the same with regard to the Indian tribes…they really meant nothing but peace"
He alone had expanded a political program upon two simple principles which were very baneful for Jefferson, Madison, Harrison, Jackson…Reagan, Bush: 1) He wanted all the Indian tribes join together in order to form their confederation and to stop the American encroachments 2) the Indian land was not to be owned by a single tribe but it could be sold to USA only if all the tribes agreed: that is never more.
If US had peaceflly agreed, recognized Indians' rights and stop any more invasion or encroachment upon their land, was there any reason to a war between them? Harrison said: "(The Indians) will never have recourse to arms unless riven to it by a series of injustice and oppression."
But he after having drawn Tecumseh as "One of the uncommon geniouses which springs up occasionally to produce revolutions and overturn the established order of things" (the order of things the US wanted establish on the Indians, like as the Relocation west of Mississipi – to be read 'an Ethnic Cleansing') he wrote also the next words to the War Department.
"If it not were for the vicinity of the US he would perhaps be the founder of an empire that rival in glory Mexico and Peru…He is now upon the last round to put a finishing stroke to his work. I hope however before his return that that part of work which he considered complete will be demolished and even its founadtion rooted up."
"Before his return". Harrison knew very well that Tecumseh alone was and had the political structure of Tippecanoe: the Governor crossed up the line North of which the Indians owned their legal land just because he relied on the provoked honor of the tribesmen to obtain on Nov. 11, 1811 the kind of answer the Shawnee chief had strongly forbidden them from giving.
Why a sculptured portrait of Tecumseh is among other portraits of men who made great the US in one of the Power Palaces in Washington D.C.? Why the brochure given at the Tippecanoe Memorial says of him "as both a great Indian and a great American"? Not only he fought the US all over his life for the Indian freedom, but the US fought him and his free, united native Nation till to their death. The brochure: "The Americans fought for a dream…of a great land of free men. The Indian fought for the same land, his happy hunting ground on earth'…'Tippecanoe Monument…righty honors the brave soldiers and Indians that died here. Today freedom prevails in America…the heritage of all that fought here'…'Jefferson wanted the Indian lands for America, he planned to buy land from whichever tribe owned it…he would train the braves to farm and be content without the vast land they had neede as hunters."
So the Indians were so savages that were not able to fight for their freedom: only the Americans could do it; and the freedom for the Indians was to be deported more and more to West: Alexis de Tocqueville (an admirer of the newborn Republic) nevertheless wrote that the Americans would have joined the Indians where they be gone into 'ten years'.
But did not the Declaration of Independence proclaim these words which are immortal and applicable to each man, to each people: "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all the men are created equal…endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights…Life, Liberty, pursuit of Happiness…"?
Words written a few years before Tippecanoe…

]]>