| |

Victor of VerdunBy Robert B. Bruce | Military History | 6 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post He worked closely with Nivelle to assemble guns and munitions for the attack and to refine Nivelle’s concept of a “rolling barrage,” in which a curtain of artillery fire was dropped directly in front of the assault formations and then shifted forward at timed intervals to provide fire support as the infantry advanced. The two men agreed that General Charles Mangin should lead the attack. Nicknamed “the Butcher” by his detractors, Mangin was a skilled tactician who personally led his troops into battle. Pétain saw to it that Mangin’s battalions were brought up to full strength and equipped with the latest weapons, including grenade launchers, automatic rifles and flamethrowers. Subscribe Today
The counteroffensive began on October 19. Pétain had amassed more than 700 heavy guns—including a battery of new “super heavy” 400mm railway guns—and a like number of light and medium pieces. He made counterbattery fire a top priority, and in just three days the French artillery, directed by observation balloons and aircraft, knocked out more than half of the German batteries in the Douaumont sector. To keep the Germans off balance, Mangin did not attack at dawn as usual but remained in position through the morning. Then, at 2 p.m., battle cries rang through the cool autumnal air. Mangin’s lead assault battalions succeeded in surprising the German defenders and quickly overran their front lines. A heavy artillery shell penetrated Fort Douaumont during the bombardment and started a fire that forced out the Germans. The fire was brought under control, but not before the French infantry had overrun the German positions. An hour after the attack started, signal rockets rose over Fort Douaumont, cueing the French artillery to shift its fire. The assault troops used mirrors to flash a one-word message back to the tactical command post at Fort Souville: Victoire. Cheers resounded at the news that after eight months Fort Douaumont was back in French hands. ![]() U.S. Gen. John "Black Jack" Pershing decorates Pétain with the Army Distinguished Service Medal. National Archives. Pétain persisted with his offensive. After consolidating his positions around Douaumont, he moved to push the Germans farther back, to ensure the safety of the fort. On December 14 the French attacked, inflicting heavy losses on the Germans. As the Battle of Verdun drew to a close in the midst of a snowstorm on December 16, the Germans had fallen back almost to their February starting point. This final attack sealed the French victory. Ludendorff conceded: “We not only suffered heavy casualties, but also lost important positions. The strain during this year had proved too great….We were completely exhausted on the Western Front.”
The Battle of Verdun was one of history’s longest and bloodiest battles, lasting almost 10 months and costing more than half a million French and German casualties. The French victory marked Germany’s descent into the abyss. While many individuals contributed to the triumph, Pétain towered above them all. General Joffre later wrote: “What saved Verdun was [Pétain’s] highly developed tactical sense, his continual perfecting of the methods of defense, and the constant improvement he effected in the organization of the command of the higher units. General Pétain was the heart and soul of the action.” Robert B. Bruce is the author of Pétain: Verdun to Vichy. For further reading, he also recommends: Verdun, by Henri-Philippe Pétain, and The Price of Glory, by Alistair Horne. Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6Tags: 20th - 21st Century, Historical Figures, Military Technology, World War I
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
6 Comments to “Victor of Verdun”
Verdun was an extension of the European fratricide going on; there were no ‘victors’…
The assumption that Petain was competent really came back to bite in WWII, didn’t it ?
By Chris Long on Jun 21, 2008 at 4:24 pm
As far as Petain being the victor of Verdun, I feel it was in the sense that he was able to stablize the French Army at Verdun and prevent a German Victory which might have knocked the French out of WWI. As far as his later years and his conviction for cooperating with the Germans during WWII, he was an old man without a political background. He like a lot of other people felt after the Fall of France in 1940, that the Germans had won the war. He was trying to get the best terms for France in the New Order.
By Jerry Staatz on Jun 29, 2008 at 8:28 pm
I too think that there were other forces at play during this battle, but Petain rose above all the dispair with death all around him & the possiblity of defeat at hand, he lead a staunch defense the best way he could & succeded.He was the right man in the right place at the right time.
Joe Cottone sr
By Joseph A Cottone sr on Jul 2, 2008 at 3:12 pm
Those who chhoose to view history as a continuous flow of interrelated events and who see World War I and World War II as the same war, with a 20 year truce or armistice interrupting it, will view Petain much as we Americans generally view Benedict Arnold. While intially brave, resolute,brilliant and resourceful, adversity eventually got the better of him and he took counsel of his fears and opted for what his counterymen now view as treason. If you coose to view each war serparately, you can postulate that in his prime, Petain was a formidable General officer, tactician, logistician and artillerist. In his old age, he was defeatist, cynical and eager to preserve his nation at the no little expense of his personal integrity, honor and historial reputation. I say have pity on him in either case.
By Frank X. Weiss on Jul 3, 2008 at 11:13 am
What is sad about the Battle of Verdun is that it defined French military tactics to the point that the French Army after WWI believed that the defense would always stop offensive operations. The immense casualities the French took in WWI also contributed to the idea that defense would conserve lives. It took the the German Panzers to make the French realize their error. The Price of Glory by Alstair Horne is a great book about Verdun and its effect on the French military thinking between WWI and WWII.
By Jerry Staatz on Jul 6, 2008 at 10:25 pm