| |

Victor of VerdunBy Robert B. Bruce | Military History | 6 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post In 1916 aircraft and observation balloons were the eyes of the artillery. The Germans had established air superiority in the early stages of battle, but the French general was determined to win it back so his guns would have adequate fire direction. He summoned the pioneering French fighter pilot Charles Tricornot de Rose to his headquarters and exclaimed, “Rose, I am blind! Clean the skies for me!” Subscribe Today
In the following weeks, Commandant de Rose assembled the best pilots of the Aéronautique militaire, including Jean Navarre, Georges Guynemer and Charles Nungesser. De Rose organized these elite pilots into escadrilles de chasse, the first true fighter squadrons in aviation history, and sent them into battle against the Germans. The new fighter squadrons scored numerous victories. At Pétain’s urging, they grew dramatically in strength over the course of the battle and upgraded repeatedly with new and better models of aircraft. Eventually there were 15 squadrons, including the famed Escadrille américaine (later rechristened the Escadrille de Lafayette), composed of volunteer American pilots who first experienced air combat in the skies over Verdun. By the summer of 1916 the Allied aviators had gained the upper hand. “Verdun was the crucible where French aviation was forged,” Pétain later wrote. His ability to incorporate the nascent technology of military aviation into his operations at Verdun was a key component in the ultimate French victory. After the German onslaught of February and March 1916, the battle settled into a grim struggle of attrition in which the French were at a decided disadvantage. Crammed into a narrow bridgehead on the east bank of the Meuse, they were ringed by German artillery that both outnumbered and outgunned their own. The one advantage the French claimed was their forts, which by Pétain’s orders had been transformed into powerful centers of resistance. The central citadel of Verdun served as the main command post. Its massive earth-covered walls and subterranean galleries made it an ideal headquarters, hospital and supply depot. The tactical command center for French operations on the east bank of the Meuse was Fort Souville, one of the more modern forts in the sector. It, too, was well built, with multiple steel-reinforced concrete machine-gun positions that rose hydra-like from the subterranean fortress and spat fire at any who dared approach. This fortress withstood numerous attacks, barring every attempt by the Germans to advance from their ridgeline and take Verdun. The older forts in the sector proved very useful as shelters for reserve formations, supplies and field hospitals. Pétain, unlike many other commanders of the era, had a sincere concern for the well-being of his men and understood the sacrifice being asked of the soldiers he sent into battle. He instituted a rotational system, whereby after three days at the front a division would be withdrawn and spend a week recovering before returning to battle. This allowed the men just enough respite to keep themselves physically and psychologically strong for the fight. In stark contrast, the German practice was to keep frontline divisions in action until they were virtually destroyed. General Joffre was pleased by Pétain’s defense of Verdun but grew impatient with the battle. He urged Pétain to launch an immediate counteroffensive, but Pétain refused, insisting that the Germans were still too strong. Joffre was also annoyed by Pétain’s constant demands for more men, guns and supplies; the Battle of Verdun was consuming reserves Joffre had earmarked for a joint French-British offensive along the Somme that summer. Joffre believed that Pétain’s obsession with Verdun had blinded him to the overall Allied strategy. The French commander in chief argued that the best way to halt German attacks on Verdun was for the Allies to launch their own offensive in a different sector. For his part, Pétain was frustrated by a high command that didn’t recognize that the climactic battle of the war had arrived. Pétain believed that if Verdun fell, France itself would not survive. Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6Tags: 20th - 21st Century, Historical Figures, Military Technology, World War I
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
6 Comments to “Victor of Verdun”
Verdun was an extension of the European fratricide going on; there were no ‘victors’…
The assumption that Petain was competent really came back to bite in WWII, didn’t it ?
By Chris Long on Jun 21, 2008 at 4:24 pm
As far as Petain being the victor of Verdun, I feel it was in the sense that he was able to stablize the French Army at Verdun and prevent a German Victory which might have knocked the French out of WWI. As far as his later years and his conviction for cooperating with the Germans during WWII, he was an old man without a political background. He like a lot of other people felt after the Fall of France in 1940, that the Germans had won the war. He was trying to get the best terms for France in the New Order.
By Jerry Staatz on Jun 29, 2008 at 8:28 pm
I too think that there were other forces at play during this battle, but Petain rose above all the dispair with death all around him & the possiblity of defeat at hand, he lead a staunch defense the best way he could & succeded.He was the right man in the right place at the right time.
Joe Cottone sr
By Joseph A Cottone sr on Jul 2, 2008 at 3:12 pm
Those who chhoose to view history as a continuous flow of interrelated events and who see World War I and World War II as the same war, with a 20 year truce or armistice interrupting it, will view Petain much as we Americans generally view Benedict Arnold. While intially brave, resolute,brilliant and resourceful, adversity eventually got the better of him and he took counsel of his fears and opted for what his counterymen now view as treason. If you coose to view each war serparately, you can postulate that in his prime, Petain was a formidable General officer, tactician, logistician and artillerist. In his old age, he was defeatist, cynical and eager to preserve his nation at the no little expense of his personal integrity, honor and historial reputation. I say have pity on him in either case.
By Frank X. Weiss on Jul 3, 2008 at 11:13 am
What is sad about the Battle of Verdun is that it defined French military tactics to the point that the French Army after WWI believed that the defense would always stop offensive operations. The immense casualities the French took in WWI also contributed to the idea that defense would conserve lives. It took the the German Panzers to make the French realize their error. The Price of Glory by Alstair Horne is a great book about Verdun and its effect on the French military thinking between WWI and WWII.
By Jerry Staatz on Jul 6, 2008 at 10:25 pm