<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uneasy About Alcohol - America and the Booze Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/uneasy-about-alcohol-america-and-the-booze-question.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/uneasy-about-alcohol-america-and-the-booze-question.htm</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:58:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AP: Reading for Roaring &#8212; and Repressive &#8212; 1920s &#171; Mr. Rickman&#039;s blog</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/uneasy-about-alcohol-america-and-the-booze-question.htm#comment-883848</link>
		<dc:creator>AP: Reading for Roaring &#8212; and Repressive &#8212; 1920s &#171; Mr. Rickman&#039;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13679799#comment-883848</guid>
		<description>[...] Uneasy about alcohol: American and the booze question [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Uneasy about alcohol: American and the booze question [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jane elizabeth caldwell</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/uneasy-about-alcohol-america-and-the-booze-question.htm#comment-815284</link>
		<dc:creator>jane elizabeth caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 10:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13679799#comment-815284</guid>
		<description>What a brilliant brutal description of history of  &#039;sinking piss&#039; in america</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a brilliant brutal description of history of  &#039;sinking piss&#039; in america</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UNA HI202: Discussion Board #2 (Due Feb. 21 11:59 p.m.) &#171; Mr. Rickman&#039;s blog</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/uneasy-about-alcohol-america-and-the-booze-question.htm#comment-789239</link>
		<dc:creator>UNA HI202: Discussion Board #2 (Due Feb. 21 11:59 p.m.) &#171; Mr. Rickman&#039;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13679799#comment-789239</guid>
		<description>[...] Uneasy about alcohol: American and the booze question [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Uneasy about alcohol: American and the booze question [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeepBreath</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/uneasy-about-alcohol-america-and-the-booze-question.htm#comment-642301</link>
		<dc:creator>DeepBreath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13679799#comment-642301</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re right--there is a clash between two different mindsets, or world views.  This is being played out with the issue of marijuana today.  Making a drug illegal seems like a common-sense solution.  If something is bad, why should we let people do it?  (Re)legalizing it just seems wrong.  We would be letting irresponsible people get away with doing bad things, giving up control.  If we&#039;re doing the right thing, we shouldn&#039;t give up just because its difficult or expensive or unpopular.
The arguments on one side have to do with principles, and the arguments on the other have to do with practical results, so we end up talking past each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#039;re right&#8211;there is a clash between two different mindsets, or world views.  This is being played out with the issue of marijuana today.  Making a drug illegal seems like a common-sense solution.  If something is bad, why should we let people do it?  (Re)legalizing it just seems wrong.  We would be letting irresponsible people get away with doing bad things, giving up control.  If we&#039;re doing the right thing, we shouldn&#039;t give up just because its difficult or expensive or unpopular.<br />
The arguments on one side have to do with principles, and the arguments on the other have to do with practical results, so we end up talking past each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erniepaul izereckt</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/uneasy-about-alcohol-america-and-the-booze-question.htm#comment-314680</link>
		<dc:creator>erniepaul izereckt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 19:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13679799#comment-314680</guid>
		<description>Marijuana:::::::Better High,NO LITTER,NO DUI&#039;s &amp; U can drop the hangover and all headaches</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marijuana:::::::Better High,NO LITTER,NO DUI&#039;s &amp; U can drop the hangover and all headaches</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hinrustjum</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/uneasy-about-alcohol-america-and-the-booze-question.htm#comment-297716</link>
		<dc:creator>hinrustjum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13679799#comment-297716</guid>
		<description>?????? ?????? ???????? ???????????! ???????? ????? ???????????? ????????? ??????? ????????.   r­u/podglyadyvanie-skr­ytaya-kamera-znameni­tostey-v-neglyazhe-.   ?? ??? ????????? ???????? ???-?? ????????? ? ?????????? ?????????? ?????????? ? ??????? ??????.   ? ????????? ?? ???????? ????? ???????????? ? ??? ?????? ?? ???? ??????? ???? ????? ? ????? ?? ?????? ???????? ?????.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>?????? ?????? ???????? ???????????! ???????? ????? ???????????? ????????? ??????? ????????.   r­u/podglyadyvanie-skr­ytaya-kamera-znameni­tostey-v-neglyazhe-.   ?? ??? ????????? ???????? ???-?? ????????? ? ?????????? ?????????? ?????????? ? ??????? ??????.   ? ????????? ?? ???????? ????? ???????????? ? ??? ?????? ?? ???? ??????? ???? ????? ? ????? ?? ?????? ???????? ?????.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/uneasy-about-alcohol-america-and-the-booze-question.htm#comment-84838</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13679799#comment-84838</guid>
		<description>The prohibition era has always been a taint on the American spirit of liberty for all.  The same right wing fascists who wanted to deny Americans the right to drink, are now waging their war against an even more benign intoxicant - marijuana. Except these days they have learned to keep the white hoods and the burning crosses out of sight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The prohibition era has always been a taint on the American spirit of liberty for all.  The same right wing fascists who wanted to deny Americans the right to drink, are now waging their war against an even more benign intoxicant &#8211; marijuana. Except these days they have learned to keep the white hoods and the burning crosses out of sight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ringler</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/uneasy-about-alcohol-america-and-the-booze-question.htm#comment-72500</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ringler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13679799#comment-72500</guid>
		<description>I drink a 12 pack of Bush beer a day. I don&#039;t own a Vehicle or go to Bar&#039;s. What&#039;s wrong with me sitting at home after Work, and watching the History Channel with half a jag on. I know there are people who can&#039;t seem to get it together when they Drink. Please don&#039;t take it out on us Fuctoinal Drunk&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I drink a 12 pack of Bush beer a day. I don&#039;t own a Vehicle or go to Bar&#039;s. What&#039;s wrong with me sitting at home after Work, and watching the History Channel with half a jag on. I know there are people who can&#039;t seem to get it together when they Drink. Please don&#039;t take it out on us Fuctoinal Drunk&#039;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik G</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/uneasy-about-alcohol-america-and-the-booze-question.htm#comment-71275</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13679799#comment-71275</guid>
		<description>The article misses a few points and fails to provide sources to some claims.

First point -- alcohol does infact create violent crime in America, something like 30% of violent crime is associated with alcohol, which rises to 66% when an intimate person is involved (http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/cvict_c.htm#alcohol). Prohibition is not the answer, but church groups were somewhat correct to assert &quot;criminals&quot; hung out at saloons.

Second point -- it&#039;s not a battle between pursuit of happiness and righteousness. Binge drinkers, alcoholics, other drinkers are more happy than people who don&#039;t drink? Please quote stats on happiness scales before making that claim. Also, alcoholics self-report lower self esteem and higher levels of depression. Hemingway blew his brains out with a shotgun from depression, and many of the artists they quoted suffered from depression or killed themselves. Pursuit of happiness, are you sure?

Third point -- The alcohol and tobacco lobby is very strong. So to just claim it&#039;s somehow just &quot;American&quot; to drink largely ignores strategic lobbying and advertisements from various lobbying groups and breweries to make beer a pivotal part of sports and nascar.

fourth -- the article fails to realize beer was brought aboard ships because water would go bad and beer was fatty and filling. Clean, fresh water wasn&#039;t readily available. But, beer could be stored in barrels, ferment, and be filling for some time.

fifth -- there&#039;s a big point you fail to realize that&#039;s separate from wet and dry, that is binge drinking made popular by our good friends at frats, sororities, and movies like &quot;animal house.&quot;

Lastly, there&#039;s nothing wrong with drinking, just poisoning yourself until you have to vomit or pass out shouldn&#039;t be classified as admirable or a pursuit of happiness. Also, to challenge a popular notion, being able to swipe a credit card or hand cash to salesmen at a beer/wine/liquor shop doesn&#039;t make some anyone more &quot;cool,&quot; &quot;chill,&quot; &quot;fun,&quot; and most importantly, &quot;happy.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article misses a few points and fails to provide sources to some claims.</p>
<p>First point &#8212; alcohol does infact create violent crime in America, something like 30% of violent crime is associated with alcohol, which rises to 66% when an intimate person is involved (<a href="http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/cvict_c.htm#alcohol" rel="nofollow">http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/cvict_c.htm#alcohol</a>). Prohibition is not the answer, but church groups were somewhat correct to assert &#034;criminals&#034; hung out at saloons.</p>
<p>Second point &#8212; it&#039;s not a battle between pursuit of happiness and righteousness. Binge drinkers, alcoholics, other drinkers are more happy than people who don&#039;t drink? Please quote stats on happiness scales before making that claim. Also, alcoholics self-report lower self esteem and higher levels of depression. Hemingway blew his brains out with a shotgun from depression, and many of the artists they quoted suffered from depression or killed themselves. Pursuit of happiness, are you sure?</p>
<p>Third point &#8212; The alcohol and tobacco lobby is very strong. So to just claim it&#039;s somehow just &#034;American&#034; to drink largely ignores strategic lobbying and advertisements from various lobbying groups and breweries to make beer a pivotal part of sports and nascar.</p>
<p>fourth &#8212; the article fails to realize beer was brought aboard ships because water would go bad and beer was fatty and filling. Clean, fresh water wasn&#039;t readily available. But, beer could be stored in barrels, ferment, and be filling for some time.</p>
<p>fifth &#8212; there&#039;s a big point you fail to realize that&#039;s separate from wet and dry, that is binge drinking made popular by our good friends at frats, sororities, and movies like &#034;animal house.&#034;</p>
<p>Lastly, there&#039;s nothing wrong with drinking, just poisoning yourself until you have to vomit or pass out shouldn&#039;t be classified as admirable or a pursuit of happiness. Also, to challenge a popular notion, being able to swipe a credit card or hand cash to salesmen at a beer/wine/liquor shop doesn&#039;t make some anyone more &#034;cool,&#034; &#034;chill,&#034; &#034;fun,&#034; and most importantly, &#034;happy.&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alise</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/uneasy-about-alcohol-america-and-the-booze-question.htm#comment-46896</link>
		<dc:creator>Alise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 04:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13679799#comment-46896</guid>
		<description>Today businessman the 75th Day of the annulment of Forbiddance, so look to see the port&#039;s exerciser crowded with disorderly drunks tonight...kinda equivalent every Friday. Exclusive tonight, it&#039;s debauchery with an eye on history! For on this day in 1933, the 21st amendment to cancellation proscription was ratified by Utah, Penn, and River, achieving the three-fourths of states required to ratify Constitutional amendments proposed by Legislature. Try remembering this fun fact tonight in the sodden haze: The 21st amendment is the only term a Integral amendment has repealed other amendment! Real news....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today businessman the 75th Day of the annulment of Forbiddance, so look to see the port&#039;s exerciser crowded with disorderly drunks tonight&#8230;kinda equivalent every Friday. Exclusive tonight, it&#039;s debauchery with an eye on history! For on this day in 1933, the 21st amendment to cancellation proscription was ratified by Utah, Penn, and River, achieving the three-fourths of states required to ratify Constitutional amendments proposed by Legislature. Try remembering this fun fact tonight in the sodden haze: The 21st amendment is the only term a Integral amendment has repealed other amendment! Real news&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
