| |

Uneasy About Alcohol – America and the Booze QuestionBy Peter Carlson | American History | 5 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post Alas, it didn’t work out that way. Prohibition not only failed to eradicate slums and prisons, it even failed to curtail drinking, a pastime that now took on the allure of a forbidden thrill. Booze was smuggled into the country on “rumrunner” ships, cooked up in countless illegal distilleries, breweries and bathtubs and sold to eager customers in illicit saloons known as speakeasies. Subscribe Today
New York City, which had 15,000 legal saloons before Prohibition, soon had 32,000 speakeasies. They came in infinite varieties, and two newspapermen described a few dozen in their 1932 guidebook, Manhattan Oases. The oases ranged from the prosaic Log Cabin (“designed for the visiting Shriner”) to the seedy Julius’s (“as weird as a witch’s Sabbath and as noisome as the psychopathic ward at Bellevue Hospital”) to the elegant 19th Hole (“a nice hideaway for bond salesmen and their customers’ wives”). Prohibition made selling booze a crime, which naturally attracted criminals to the business. Gangsters battled for control of the liquor trade, and the winners became big businessmen, millionaires with bribe-bought political power. The most famous was Al Capone, who survived a gang war that created 500 corpses to become one of the most powerful men in Chicago. “Somehow I just naturally drifted into the racket,” he told an interviewer from Liberty magazine in 1931. “And I guess I’m here to stay until the law is repealed.” Dry forces were confident that the law would never be repealed. “There is as much chance of repealing the Eighteenth Amendment,” said Senator Morris Sheppard, “as there is for a hummingbird to fly to the planet Mars with the Washington Monument tied to its tail.” Propelled by overwhelming public opinion against Prohibition, a hummingbird reached Mars on Dec. 5, 1933, and celebrations broke out across America. “Downtown bars were lined five and six deep,” the Chicago Tribune reported the next day. “‘Sweet Adeline’ and other old favorites rang in many of the bars as morning neared. Wags made frequent requests of musicians for the WCTU song, ‘It’s in the Constitution and It’s There to Stay,’ but nobody could remember the tune.” Repeal did not set off a wild national bender, as some dries had predicted, but it did result in one permanent change in American drinking habits: Respectable women began patronizing bars. “Women Flock To Bars As The New Wet Era Opens,” the Chicago Tribune reported. “Many women are crowding up to be served, something considered not quite right in the days preceding prohibition.” Before World War I, the saloon was largely a male outpost—one reason many women supported Prohibition. But after repeal, women, who’d recently gained the right to vote, seized the right to drink in public. In 1935, two years after repeal, two middle-class alcoholics with wonderfully American names—Bill Wilson and Bob Smith—founded an organization that proved far more effective than Prohibition in combating drunkenness. Wilson, a former Wall Street whiz kid, and Smith, a doctor, named their group “Alcoholics Anonymous” and it has spread around the world, helping millions of alcoholics kick the habit. These days, American liquor stores are packed with a dazzling variety of beverages, ranging from gourmet single-malt Scotches and domestic and imported wines, to neon-colored concoctions like MD 20/20 Blue Raspberry, and new alcoholic “energy drinks” like Joose, which mixes booze with caffeine, ginseng and tropical fruit juices. But the United States is, statistically speaking, a nation of moderate drinkers, ranking somewhere around 20th in surveys of worldwide per capita alcohol consumption, depending on how the data is calculated. Although our intake is far behind most European countries, American life is suffused with booze. We drink at weddings and wakes—and sometimes at baby showers, baptisms, graduation parties, anniversaries and funerals. We drink to celebrate our triumphs and drown our sorrows—but also just to unwind after another dull day at work. Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6Tags: American History, Social History, Women's History
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
5 Comments to “Uneasy About Alcohol – America and the Booze Question”
Today businessman the 75th Day of the annulment of Forbiddance, so look to see the port’s exerciser crowded with disorderly drunks tonight…kinda equivalent every Friday. Exclusive tonight, it’s debauchery with an eye on history! For on this day in 1933, the 21st amendment to cancellation proscription was ratified by Utah, Penn, and River, achieving the three-fourths of states required to ratify Constitutional amendments proposed by Legislature. Try remembering this fun fact tonight in the sodden haze: The 21st amendment is the only term a Integral amendment has repealed other amendment! Real news….
By Alise on Mar 27, 2009 at 12:32 am
The article misses a few points and fails to provide sources to some claims.
First point — alcohol does infact create violent crime in America, something like 30% of violent crime is associated with alcohol, which rises to 66% when an intimate person is involved (http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/cvict_c.htm#alcohol). Prohibition is not the answer, but church groups were somewhat correct to assert “criminals” hung out at saloons.
Second point — it’s not a battle between pursuit of happiness and righteousness. Binge drinkers, alcoholics, other drinkers are more happy than people who don’t drink? Please quote stats on happiness scales before making that claim. Also, alcoholics self-report lower self esteem and higher levels of depression. Hemingway blew his brains out with a shotgun from depression, and many of the artists they quoted suffered from depression or killed themselves. Pursuit of happiness, are you sure?
Third point — The alcohol and tobacco lobby is very strong. So to just claim it’s somehow just “American” to drink largely ignores strategic lobbying and advertisements from various lobbying groups and breweries to make beer a pivotal part of sports and nascar.
fourth — the article fails to realize beer was brought aboard ships because water would go bad and beer was fatty and filling. Clean, fresh water wasn’t readily available. But, beer could be stored in barrels, ferment, and be filling for some time.
fifth — there’s a big point you fail to realize that’s separate from wet and dry, that is binge drinking made popular by our good friends at frats, sororities, and movies like “animal house.”
Lastly, there’s nothing wrong with drinking, just poisoning yourself until you have to vomit or pass out shouldn’t be classified as admirable or a pursuit of happiness. Also, to challenge a popular notion, being able to swipe a credit card or hand cash to salesmen at a beer/wine/liquor shop doesn’t make some anyone more “cool,” “chill,” “fun,” and most importantly, “happy.”
By Erik G on Jun 2, 2009 at 12:12 pm
I drink a 12 pack of Bush beer a day. I don’t own a Vehicle or go to Bar’s. What’s wrong with me sitting at home after Work, and watching the History Channel with half a jag on. I know there are people who can’t seem to get it together when they Drink. Please don’t take it out on us Fuctoinal Drunk’s.
By David Ringler on Jun 3, 2009 at 9:17 pm
The prohibition era has always been a taint on the American spirit of liberty for all. The same right wing fascists who wanted to deny Americans the right to drink, are now waging their war against an even more benign intoxicant – marijuana. Except these days they have learned to keep the white hoods and the burning crosses out of sight.
By Dave on Jul 6, 2009 at 12:56 pm