HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

Uneasy About Alcohol – America and the Booze Question

By Peter Carlson | American History  | 5 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

Part of the popularity of patent medicines was their appeal to a growing segment of the American population—prohibitionists. In fact, a patent medicine called “Old Dr. Kaufmann’s Great Sulphur Bitters,” which contained 22 percent alcohol, targeted prohibitionists with ads featuring an endorsement by Mrs. S. Louise Barton, “An Indefatigable and Life-Long Worker in the Temperance Cause.” For prohibitionists, such patent medicines were a godsend, enabling them to stay pleasantly (but respectably) tipsy while toiling in the great national crusade to rid America of the demon rum.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to American History magazine

Prohibition is incontrovertible proof that you don’t have to be drunk to come up with a really, really bad idea. Stone cold sober but intoxicated on the powerful elixir of righteous idealism, American prohibitionists believed that the demon rum and its church, the saloon, were the world’s prime sources of evil. “When the saloon goes,” said Ernest Cherrington, a leader of the Anti-Saloon League, “the devil will be ready to quit.”

The American temperance movement is as old as America itself, but it became a political force in the mid-1800s, fueled in part by a bias against immigrants, including Irish and Italian Catholics, who were stereotyped as shiftless alcoholics. After the Civil War, it spawned two powerful groups—the Prohibition Party and the Woman’s Christian Temperance Union, whose slogan was “For God, Home and Native Land.”

The WCTU’s most famous member was Carry Nation, a Kansas minister’s wife, who led bands of women into saloons, where they sang hymns to the patrons and greeted bartenders with a cheery “Good morning, destroyer of men’s souls!” When those efforts failed to dry out Kansas, Nation prayed to God for direction and was awakened by a heavenly voice saying, “Go to Kiowa.” She went to the town of Kiowa, where she invaded three saloons, smashing the liquor bottles with rocks. Soon, she replaced the rocks with a hatchet and became famous, traveling across America, smashing up saloons with her trademark wrecking tool. Arrested dozens of times, she paid her fines with money raised by selling little souvenir hatchets.

But it wasn’t the antics of Carry Nation who won the fight for prohibition; it was the political savvy of the Anti-Saloon League, which added clout to the crusade for salvation of individual drunkards by strong-arming government officials. Founded in 1895, the league pioneered many of the techniques now used by modern advocacy groups. Working through local churches—generally rural Methodist or Baptist churches—it raised money, endorsed candidates and successfully lobbied for laws banning liquor in many towns and counties. In 1905 the league demonstrated its growing power by defeating Ohio Governor Myron Herrick, who had thwarted the league’s legislative agenda—an upset that terrified wet politicians.

In 1913 the league kicked off its drive for a constitutional amendment prohibiting liquor with a march on Washington and a massive letter-writing campaign that flooded Congress with mail. The amendment failed in 1914, but gained strength during World War I, when the league exploited America’s anti-German hysteria by deliberately associating beer with German-American brewers. “Kaiserism abroad and booze at home must go,” declared the league’s general counsel and wily Washington lobbyist, Wayne Wheeler.

It worked. Congress passed the amendment in 1918, and the states ratified it so quickly that America’s wets barely had time to finish their drinks and start fighting back. When the new law went into effect on January 17, 1920, evangelist Billy Sunday held a funeral for John Barleycorn in Norfolk, Va. “The slums will soon be a memory,” he predicted. “We will turn our prisons into factories and our jails into storehouses and corncribs….Hell will be forever for rent.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Tags: , ,

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 5 Comments to “Uneasy About Alcohol – America and the Booze Question”

  2. Today businessman the 75th Day of the annulment of Forbiddance, so look to see the port’s exerciser crowded with disorderly drunks tonight…kinda equivalent every Friday. Exclusive tonight, it’s debauchery with an eye on history! For on this day in 1933, the 21st amendment to cancellation proscription was ratified by Utah, Penn, and River, achieving the three-fourths of states required to ratify Constitutional amendments proposed by Legislature. Try remembering this fun fact tonight in the sodden haze: The 21st amendment is the only term a Integral amendment has repealed other amendment! Real news….

    By Alise on Mar 27, 2009 at 12:32 am

  3. The article misses a few points and fails to provide sources to some claims.

    First point — alcohol does infact create violent crime in America, something like 30% of violent crime is associated with alcohol, which rises to 66% when an intimate person is involved (http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/cvict_c.htm#alcohol). Prohibition is not the answer, but church groups were somewhat correct to assert “criminals” hung out at saloons.

    Second point — it’s not a battle between pursuit of happiness and righteousness. Binge drinkers, alcoholics, other drinkers are more happy than people who don’t drink? Please quote stats on happiness scales before making that claim. Also, alcoholics self-report lower self esteem and higher levels of depression. Hemingway blew his brains out with a shotgun from depression, and many of the artists they quoted suffered from depression or killed themselves. Pursuit of happiness, are you sure?

    Third point — The alcohol and tobacco lobby is very strong. So to just claim it’s somehow just “American” to drink largely ignores strategic lobbying and advertisements from various lobbying groups and breweries to make beer a pivotal part of sports and nascar.

    fourth — the article fails to realize beer was brought aboard ships because water would go bad and beer was fatty and filling. Clean, fresh water wasn’t readily available. But, beer could be stored in barrels, ferment, and be filling for some time.

    fifth — there’s a big point you fail to realize that’s separate from wet and dry, that is binge drinking made popular by our good friends at frats, sororities, and movies like “animal house.”

    Lastly, there’s nothing wrong with drinking, just poisoning yourself until you have to vomit or pass out shouldn’t be classified as admirable or a pursuit of happiness. Also, to challenge a popular notion, being able to swipe a credit card or hand cash to salesmen at a beer/wine/liquor shop doesn’t make some anyone more “cool,” “chill,” “fun,” and most importantly, “happy.”

    By Erik G on Jun 2, 2009 at 12:12 pm

  4. I drink a 12 pack of Bush beer a day. I don’t own a Vehicle or go to Bar’s. What’s wrong with me sitting at home after Work, and watching the History Channel with half a jag on. I know there are people who can’t seem to get it together when they Drink. Please don’t take it out on us Fuctoinal Drunk’s.

    By David Ringler on Jun 3, 2009 at 9:17 pm

  5. The prohibition era has always been a taint on the American spirit of liberty for all. The same right wing fascists who wanted to deny Americans the right to drink, are now waging their war against an even more benign intoxicant – marijuana. Except these days they have learned to keep the white hoods and the burning crosses out of sight.

    By Dave on Jul 6, 2009 at 12:56 pm

  1. 1 Trackback(s)

  2. Jan 15, 2009: PresidentsDaySociety.org » Blog Archive » Alcohol and Its Role In Our Nation’s Founding

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

OPINION POLL

Which of these World War I aircraft was the best fighter plane?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Get Our Daily HistoryNet Email
 
 


What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us|Advertise With Us|Subscription Help