HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

Uneasy About Alcohol - America and the Booze Question

By Peter Carlson | American History  | Single Page  | 5 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

The Pilgrims drank so much beer on Mayflower that they'd almost run out by the time they reached America, and they may have landed at Plymouth simply because they didn't have enough beer to fuel the search for a better place. "We could not now take time for further search and consideration," one passenger wrote, "our victuals being much spent, especially our beere." Not long after landing, the Pilgrims began making wine out of wild grapes. They served it to the Indians at the first Thanksgiving, although you probably didn't hear about that back in kindergarten.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to American History magazine

The Puritans are not known as party animals, but they arrived in Boston in 1630 on a ship that carried plenty of beer—and 10,000 gallons of wine. Despite their well-deserved reputation as killjoys, the Puritans didn't oppose drinking, they merely opposed drinking too much. "Drink is in itself a good Creature of God, and to be received with thankfulness," wrote Increase Mather, the famed Puritan preacher, "but the abuse of drink is from Satan."

All over the colonies, settlers quaffed vast quantities of this "good Creature of God." When they could get it, they drank imported wine, brandy and port, but such luxuries were expensive and tended to mysteriously disappear en route from England in accidents attributed to "leakage." Consequently, thirsty colonists began making booze out of just about everything, as recounted in this little ditty from the 1630s:

If barley be wanting to make into malt,
We must be content and think it no fault,
For we can make liquor to sweeten our lips,
Of pumpkins and parsnips and walnut-tree chips.

Among the most popular concoctions in colonial-era taverns was a drink called "Flip." The bartender filled about two-thirds of a mug or pitcher with beer, added a dollop of rum, sweetened the cocktail with sugar, molasses or dried pumpkin and then stirred it with a red-hot poker, which made the drink bubble, gurgle and steam. Good for what ails you, especially on a cold winter's night.

Tea is the beverage most commonly associated with the American Revolution, but beer and rum are far more deserving of that honor. Even though Samuel Adams was a devout Congregationalist (see "The Revolutionary Gospel According to Samuel Adams," p. 42), he recruited his Sons of Liberty in Boston taverns, causing Tories to mock him as "Sam the Publican." And the patriots who dumped British tea in Boston harbor had fortified themselves for their mission by downing several bowls of rum punch. Later, General George Washington boosted his troops' morale with a daily ration of rum. "The benefits arising from the moderate use of strong Liquor," he explained, "have been experienced in all Armies and are not to be disputed."

Unlike today's milquetoast pols, America's Founding Fathers were eager tipplers. James Madison liked to start his day with a tumbler of whiskey. John Adams breakfasted on what his son described as "a large tankard of hard cider." Washington owned one of Virginia's most productive whiskey distilleries. Thomas Jefferson was an avid wine connoisseur and so was Benjamin Franklin, who wrote an ode to drinking that concluded with this lovely couplet:

That virtue and safety's in wine-bibbing found
While all that drink water deserve to be drowned.

One of the first crises of the newborn United States of America was caused by whiskey—or, more accurately, by a whiskey tax. In 1791 Congress voted to tax whiskey, which proved to be extremely unpopular, particularly in the Appalachian Mountains, where whiskey-making was not only a passion but a major source of cash income for subsistence farmers. In 1794, near Pittsburgh, a motley army of tax protesters rebelled, attacking courts and tarring and feathering a tax collector. President Washington responded by personally leading a militia army to put down what came to be called the "Whiskey Rebellion."

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Tags: , ,

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 5 Comments to “Uneasy About Alcohol - America and the Booze Question”

  2. Today businessman the 75th Day of the annulment of Forbiddance, so look to see the port's exerciser crowded with disorderly drunks tonight…kinda equivalent every Friday. Exclusive tonight, it's debauchery with an eye on history! For on this day in 1933, the 21st amendment to cancellation proscription was ratified by Utah, Penn, and River, achieving the three-fourths of states required to ratify Constitutional amendments proposed by Legislature. Try remembering this fun fact tonight in the sodden haze: The 21st amendment is the only term a Integral amendment has repealed other amendment! Real news….

    By Alise on Mar 27, 2009 at 12:32 am

  3. The article misses a few points and fails to provide sources to some claims.

    First point — alcohol does infact create violent crime in America, something like 30% of violent crime is associated with alcohol, which rises to 66% when an intimate person is involved (http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/cvict_c.htm#alcohol). Prohibition is not the answer, but church groups were somewhat correct to assert "criminals" hung out at saloons.

    Second point — it's not a battle between pursuit of happiness and righteousness. Binge drinkers, alcoholics, other drinkers are more happy than people who don't drink? Please quote stats on happiness scales before making that claim. Also, alcoholics self-report lower self esteem and higher levels of depression. Hemingway blew his brains out with a shotgun from depression, and many of the artists they quoted suffered from depression or killed themselves. Pursuit of happiness, are you sure?

    Third point — The alcohol and tobacco lobby is very strong. So to just claim it's somehow just "American" to drink largely ignores strategic lobbying and advertisements from various lobbying groups and breweries to make beer a pivotal part of sports and nascar.

    fourth — the article fails to realize beer was brought aboard ships because water would go bad and beer was fatty and filling. Clean, fresh water wasn't readily available. But, beer could be stored in barrels, ferment, and be filling for some time.

    fifth — there's a big point you fail to realize that's separate from wet and dry, that is binge drinking made popular by our good friends at frats, sororities, and movies like "animal house."

    Lastly, there's nothing wrong with drinking, just poisoning yourself until you have to vomit or pass out shouldn't be classified as admirable or a pursuit of happiness. Also, to challenge a popular notion, being able to swipe a credit card or hand cash to salesmen at a beer/wine/liquor shop doesn't make some anyone more "cool," "chill," "fun," and most importantly, "happy."

    By Erik G on Jun 2, 2009 at 12:12 pm

  4. I drink a 12 pack of Bush beer a day. I don't own a Vehicle or go to Bar's. What's wrong with me sitting at home after Work, and watching the History Channel with half a jag on. I know there are people who can't seem to get it together when they Drink. Please don't take it out on us Fuctoinal Drunk's.

    By David Ringler on Jun 3, 2009 at 9:17 pm

  5. The prohibition era has always been a taint on the American spirit of liberty for all. The same right wing fascists who wanted to deny Americans the right to drink, are now waging their war against an even more benign intoxicant – marijuana. Except these days they have learned to keep the white hoods and the burning crosses out of sight.

    By Dave on Jul 6, 2009 at 12:56 pm

  1. 1 Trackback(s)

  2. Jan 15, 2009: PresidentsDaySociety.org » Blog Archive » Alcohol and Its Role In Our Nation’s Founding

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Given cultural differences and expanding populations, could European settlers and America’s native tribes poossibly have co-existed peacefully?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
STAY CONNECTED WITH US 
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
HistoryNet on Twitter HistoryNet RSS Feed

What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!
Today in History | Picture of the Day | Daily Quiz | Daily History Question

Copyright © 2010 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Subscription Help