<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>History Net: Where History Comes Alive - World &#38; US History Online &#187; Military Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/topics/military-technology/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:27:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What If Werner Heisenberg Had Been a Nazi?</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/what-if-werner-heisenberg-had-been-a-nazi.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-if-werner-heisenberg-had-been-a-nazi</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/what-if-werner-heisenberg-had-been-a-nazi.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aburchyski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What If ...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weaponry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13684863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: rgb(128, 0, 0);"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><img width="250" vspace="10" hspace="10" height="384" align="left" src="http://www.historynet.com/wp-content/uploads/image/2012/WWII/04%20April/what%20if.jpg" alt="" />T</b></span></span>oday the name Werner Heisenberg means little, even to highly educated people. But on the eve of World War II, he was a Nobel laureate with a reputation as possibly the world&#039;s greatest atomic physicist. So when the community &#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/what-if-werner-heisenberg-had-been-a-nazi.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The T-34/76: Stalin&#039;s Armored Fist</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-t-3476-stalins-armored-fist.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-t-3476-stalins-armored-fist</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/the-t-3476-stalins-armored-fist.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aburchyski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World War II Weapons Manual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Conflicts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13684646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The top tank of the war]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/the-t-3476-stalins-armored-fist.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What If Germany Had Developed the Atomic Bomb?</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/what-if-germany-had-developed-the-atomic-bomb.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-if-germany-had-developed-the-atomic-bomb</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/what-if-germany-had-developed-the-atomic-bomb.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aburchyski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What If ...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13684650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How a Nazi superweapon might have altered the course of the war]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/what-if-germany-had-developed-the-atomic-bomb.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Attack on Pearl Harbor</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/review-attack-on-pearl-harbor.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=review-attack-on-pearl-harbor</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/review-attack-on-pearl-harbor.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aburchyski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World War II Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13684652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new book shows where Japan went wrong at Pearl Harbor]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/review-attack-on-pearl-harbor.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patton M48A3 Battle Tank</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/patton-m48a3-battle-tank.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=patton-m48a3-battle-tank</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/patton-m48a3-battle-tank.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dnewbold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vietnam Arsenal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20th - 21st Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weaponry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13684626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although designed to combat massed Soviet armored formations, the Patton tank was an invaluable weapon for infantry support and defending firebases]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/patton-m48a3-battle-tank.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia&#039;s Centurion Mark 5 Tank</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/australias-centurion-mark-5-tank.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=australias-centurion-mark-5-tank</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/australias-centurion-mark-5-tank.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dnewbold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vietnam Arsenal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13684624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The absence of enemy tanks in Vietnam drove the Centurion into a primarily infantry-support role, with several field modifications]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/australias-centurion-mark-5-tank.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USS Grayback: Secret Submarine Landing Boat</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/uss-grayback-secret-submarine-landing-boat.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=uss-grayback-secret-submarine-landing-boat</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/uss-grayback-secret-submarine-landing-boat.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dnewbold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vietnam Arsenal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13684618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The USS Grayback, whose missions during and after the Vietnam War remain classified, was the only U.S. Navy submarine capable of covertly delivering Marines or Special Forces to an enemy shore]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/uss-grayback-secret-submarine-landing-boat.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Type 95 Torpedo: The Long Lance of Japan’s Submarine Fleet</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/type-95-torpedo-the-long-lance-of-japan%e2%80%99s-submarine-fleet.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=type-95-torpedo-the-long-lance-of-japan%25e2%2580%2599s-submarine-fleet</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/type-95-torpedo-the-long-lance-of-japan%e2%80%99s-submarine-fleet.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 21:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Lauterborn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MH Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20th - 21st Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weaponry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13684560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Type 95 boasted three times the range of its U.S. Navy counterpart, was faster than the electrically driven Mark 18, and it left no wake.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/type-95-torpedo-the-long-lance-of-japan%e2%80%99s-submarine-fleet.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A New Deconstruction of Prokhorovka</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/a-new-deconstruction-of-prokhorovka.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-new-deconstruction-of-prokhorovka</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/a-new-deconstruction-of-prokhorovka.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aburchyski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World War II Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13684348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img width="600" vspace="5" hspace="5" height="355" alt="" src="http://www.historynet.com/wp-content/uploads/image/2011/WWII/December/prokhorovka.jpg" /></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="color: rgb(128, 0, 0);"><b>Demolishing the Myth</b></span></span><b><br />
The Tank Battle at Prokhorovka, Kursk, July 1943: An Operational Narrativ</b>e<br />
<i>By Valeriy Zamulin. 672 pp.<br />
Helion &#38; Company, 2011. $69.95.</i></p>
<p><span style="color: rgb(128, 0, 0);"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>F</b></span></span>or anyone interested in the war between Russia and Germany, the battle of Prokhorovka &#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/a-new-deconstruction-of-prokhorovka.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Travel: Kiel</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/time-travel-kiel.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=time-travel-kiel</link>
		<comments>http://www.historynet.com/time-travel-kiel.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aburchyski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World War II Time Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weaponry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13684276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enter the Wolf Pack's Baltic lair.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historynet.com/time-travel-kiel.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

