<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today in History: May 22</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/today-in-history/may-22/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:17:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cosmo Kramer</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/today-in-history/may-22#comment-803713</link>
		<dc:creator>Cosmo Kramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-803713</guid>
		<description>well, here it is, 23 May 2012, two (2) years after my previous post and the erroneous entry regarding Preston Brooks STILL HAS NOT BEEN CORRECTED!  perhaps by the time 23 May rolls around next year we will see the error straightened out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, here it is, 23 May 2012, two (2) years after my previous post and the erroneous entry regarding Preston Brooks STILL HAS NOT BEEN CORRECTED!  perhaps by the time 23 May rolls around next year we will see the error straightened out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cosmo Kramer</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/today-in-history/may-22#comment-283081</link>
		<dc:creator>Cosmo Kramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 05:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-283081</guid>
		<description>I do not understand why HistoryNet insists on making Preston Brooks a &quot;senator&quot;.  see today (22MAY) in history.  This is the 3rd time that I see HistoryNet stating that this fool from S. Carolina was a senator when, in point of obvious fact, he was only a &quot;congressman&quot;.  a represantative of said state to the US Congress NOT the US SENATE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not understand why HistoryNet insists on making Preston Brooks a &#034;senator&#034;.  see today (22MAY) in history.  This is the 3rd time that I see HistoryNet stating that this fool from S. Carolina was a senator when, in point of obvious fact, he was only a &#034;congressman&#034;.  a represantative of said state to the US Congress NOT the US SENATE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

