| |

Pearl Harbor, HawaiiBy Mark Potts | World War II Time Travel | 5 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post But he and the other soldiers at Schofield soon spotted the attacking Japanese planes. They were bombing nearby Wheeler Field—the first wave of the assault. Sitting at a folding table in the visitor center, Kinzler, 86, autographs biographical sheets and other mementos for visitors. Subscribe Today
“I feel I have to be here to answer questions, whether they’re exciting or not,” Kinzler says, “to keep the legacy and story of Pearl Harbor alive.” The National Park Service employees who run the Arizona memorial and visitor center cherish the work the survivors do, and are preserving their memories via oral histories and other means. “At Gettysburg, they can see the battlefield and visit the new museum,” says Daniel Martinez, the park historian since 1988. “But they can’t talk with anybody who was there.” “I saw planes diving,” he recalls, “and thought something might be wrong. Then I saw the rising sun” on the wings. Cale grabbed a fire ax, knocked down an armory door, and grabbed a Springfield rifle to shoot at the attacking planes. He spent the next few hours pulling survivors—and bodies—from the flaming wrecks. The break-in almost got him court-martialed. “Fortunately, President Roosevelt declared war the next day, so I got an award for breaking into the armory.” The Arizona memorial was completed in 1961, and while it is in good shape, the visitor center, built on reclaimed land in 1980, is sinking, falling apart, and generally inadequate to its historic task—especially handling the thousands of people who visit it every day, some of whom have to be turned away. Ground was broken in November on a two-year project to replace the visitor center with a modern facility; the memorial will remain open throughout the construction. The new visitor center will preserve the survivors’ stories after they’re gone. “Now is the time to be talking to the survivors…they’re living history,” says Eileen Martinez, the chief of interpretation at the memorial, who recently was part of a Park Service project to compile oral history interviews with 50 survivors (about 4,000 are still alive). “That’s the challenge—how do we speak for them once they’ve passed?” Scheduled to open on December 7, 2010, the new center will be able to accommodate more visitors and exhibits and take better advantage of the site’s waterfront location overlooking Pearl Harbor and the memorial. “The hope of the new center is that it’s a pleasant experience that supplies an opportunity to learn,” says Ms. Martinez. The private, nonprofit Pearl Harbor Memorial Fund has raised more than $30 million of the project’s $52 million cost; a six-city road tour last fall brought the effort more attention, and actor and World War II buff Tom Hanks has pitched in as a fundraiser. Back on the Missouri, Reggie Johnson explains the ship’s place in history to me. The retired marine leads tours of the battleship and loves to tell its story. The Missouri’s keel had just been laid in Brooklyn, New York, when its sister ships were attacked in Pearl Harbor. The “Mighty Mo” was launched in 1944—the last American battleship—and served in the Pacific fleet. On September 2, 1945, in Tokyo Bay, Allied and Japanese leaders gathered on the Missouri’s deck to sign the documents by which Japan surrendered, ending World War II. Standing on that historic spot on the Missouri, I can see the Arizona memorial in the near distance—a unique confluence of space and time that simultaneously puts me at the beginning and the ending of America’s involvement in the war. The black tears continue to stain the gently lapping waves around the memorial, iridescent in the bright Hawaiian sunshine. It’s a sacred and solemn place, and the surroundings reflect that. “Pearl Harbor,” says Johnson, “is still quiet.” Pages: 1 2 3Tags: Travel, World War II
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
5 Comments to “Pearl Harbor, Hawaii”
Only the battle ships in Pearl Harbor wasn´t informed by the us central intelligence about the approximation of the japanese fofrces and the rest of the navy was told not to inform them about it… Why is that? US intelligence at that time was able to read all the sisnals japanese was emitting. But the thing is US needed enough reason to start war. And here it is.
By MH on Aug 13, 2009 at 10:22 am
So you mean there was a ‘conspiracy’ that allowed the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor? What if the entire Pacific Fleet were sunk?….hmmm…you think that cunning plan to get into the war might have backfired??
By LA on Aug 13, 2009 at 5:46 pm
Right. It is also proven by the conversation between Roosevelt and Churchill. Churchill also knew that the japanese troops were heading for Pearl Harbor.
There is so much hidden truth that US government prefers keep quiet because that is against them and that will turn the WWII history known as it is upside down.
Why the launching of atomic bomb can be justified even though it was against the international law?
By MH on Aug 14, 2009 at 7:02 am
There was no conversation with Roosevelt and Churchill. That was based on a document claimed to be in the National Archives from the book the Gestapo Chief. Its not there. It’s far likely a fake, made up by Gregory Douglas.
http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/ah/2002/6/2002_6_65.shtml
By Scott on Aug 17, 2009 at 4:48 pm
Could this, and other sites, please restrict the use of the comments box to those who can write and spell in a language that at the very least resembles proper English! The submission of same with misspelled words should qualify these individuals to have their computers seized. It’s like “fingernails on the chalkboard” to read this butchery. Ever heard of spell check?
By CHRIS FAJER on Aug 23, 2009 at 12:47 am