HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

Third Crusade: Siege of Acre

By Kenneth P. Czech | Military History  | 10 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

As the days continued to warm and the soggy ground dried out, the Crusaders constructed siege towers with the wood imported by the Italian merchant ships. Four stories high and capable of holding up to 500 men, these movable towers loomed as high as the walls of Acre. They were covered with hides soaked in vinegar and urine, which, it was believed, could provide protection from the deadly Greek fire that had been flung down by the garrison.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to Military History magazine

By the end of April 1190, the towers were ready. While Frankish bowmen in the crenelated tops dueled archers on the walls, thousands of Christian peasant soldiers and camp followers scurried to fill the city’s moat with rocks and fascines of brush. Once the ditch was filled, it was hoped, the towers could be pushed up against Acre’s parapets to disgorge their occupants and carry hand-to-hand combat to the enemy.

Boulders and fire pots hurled from Muslim mangonels had little effect on lumbering siege machines, which were reinforced with iron. The garrison was saved, however, by the son of a Damascus coppersmith who developed a new formula for making Greek fire. Initially scoffed at, he was finally allowed to try his creation.

On May 5, the new combustibles were shot from a mangonel and allowed to drench the siege towers. The Christians, believing they had nothing to fear, crowded the towers with archers as they jeered the defenders. Then, according to chronicler Ibn al-Athir, the man from Damascus launched a flaming pot: ‘The fire at once spread everywhere, the tower was consumed, and the outbreak happened so swiftly that the Christians had no time to flee. Men, weapons, everything was burned.’ Letters to Saladin’s camp reported that the moat around Acre had become ‘a pool of fire with the tower as a fountain.’

Crusaders and Muslims clashed on eight successive days in June, the heat baking the growing mounds of bodies. Clouds of flies accompanied the terrible stench, and disease gripped both camps. For nearly a month after, little fighting took place.

The Frankish men-at-arms tired at last of the waiting game. On St. James’ Day, July 25, they staged an attack on the Muslim lines north of Acre. It was a poorly conceived affair, with few armored knights participating. The Christian surge was primarily made up of peasant soldiers armed with pikes and axes. At-Adil, Saladin’s brother and the Muslim commander in that sector, lured the Christians into his own camp, where they broke ranks to plunder the tents. Saladin quickly sent reinforcements of Mosuli and Egyptian troops to hem in the enemy. Had it not been for the courageous efforts of Ralph de Hauterive, archdeacon of Colchester in England, the embattled soldiers might have been wiped out. Surrounded by his personal guard, the heavily armored Ralph cut a line of retreat through the Muslim ranks. The damage, however, had been done. A Muslim officer reported more than 9,000 Franks stain, including the gallant Ralph.

Three days later, on July 28, the besiegers welcomed the arrival of 10,000 men under Henry of Champagne. Henry’s army formed the vanguard of a much larger force that King Philip Augustus of France was bringing to the Holy Land. By fall, an English contingent headed by Baldwin, archbishop of Canterbury, landed with word that King Richard I of England had also embarked on the Crusade. It would be some time, however, before either Philip or Richard arrived at Acre.

While Henry of Champagne planned assaults on the city, including the use of battering rams, Saladin received word that Frederick Barbarossa had died while crossing a shallow river near Armenia. Although leadership fell to Barbarossa’s son Frederick of Swabia, the German crusade began to disintegrate. Numerous German nobles returned to Europe. Those who remained with the Duke of Swabia were beset by famine and stain in great numbers by Muslim Seljuk and Kurdish tribesmen. ‘We had many dead,’ reported a German knight. ‘We were obliged to kill our horses and eat their meat, and to feed the fire with our lances.’ Only 5,000 ragged survivors reached friendly Tripoli, finally joining the siege at Acre in October.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Tags: ,

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 10 Comments to “Third Crusade: Siege of Acre”

  2. like lewis oliver i am too reminded of my childhood years. i remeber once when the christians invaded my small village, mamrakova, it was a most traumatising time, i feel for you lewis. i know how hard it is to move on from times like these but you really just have to let it go and get on with your life.
    my love and sympathies to you mr oliver.
    yours sincerely,
    frazumakin boganshae.

    By frazumakin boganshae on Jul 30, 2008 at 11:21 pm

  3. Hi my name is conrad,my freinds call me Gaydogs .I like old men taking adventage of me and rubbing myself with oil and cry.

    By lolzman95 on Jul 30, 2008 at 11:25 pm

  4. Just an unauthenticated post, no probs!

    By tester on Aug 13, 2008 at 5:03 am

  5. great article about the events of acre, the only thing I don’t like is there is no mention of the Teutonic knights. The battle of Acre is where the Teutonic knights got there start but there is no mention of them at all.

    By Nicholas Kramer on Oct 17, 2008 at 12:26 pm

  6. nice info. But i am looking for battle of Hattin…
    Thanks anway !
    \,,/{(> . <)}\,,/

    By arcane dude11 on Apr 1, 2009 at 8:04 am

  7. if the crusades were started by the christans vainity why would the muslims not send for help from somewhere and if acre was diseased and so on why wasn’t jeuseleum. jaafa or damacus?

    By ryobies on Jun 2, 2009 at 7:21 am

  8. very interesting im quite interested in the ttemplars and the crusade of the holy land

    By daniel gillie on Sep 21, 2009 at 8:17 pm

  9. Great article, I read another informative articles about the crusade movement in Crusades-Medieval

    By adleer on Oct 27, 2009 at 10:43 pm

  10. Interesting tactic with the tunnels and mangonel bombardment, much better than the general information other sources mention about the siege. It’s also good to see a few weapons actually named rather than just categorized.

    By Paul S on Nov 10, 2009 at 7:51 pm

  1. 1 Trackback(s)

  2. May 24, 2008: Science And Supermodels » Blog Archive » Important Weekend Science: The Bar Pick-Up

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

OPINION POLL

Which of these World War I aircraft was the best fighter plane?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Get Our Daily HistoryNet Email
 
 


What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us|Advertise With Us|Subscription Help