Paid Advertisement
Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link Weider History Group RSS feed Weider Subscriptions Historynet Home page

They Marched Into Sunlight: War and Peace, Vietnam and America, October 1967 (Book Review)

Originally published on HistoryNet.com. Published Online: June 12, 2006 
Print Friendly
1 comment FONT +  FONT -

Reviewed by Lewis Sorley
By David Maraniss
Simon & Schuster, New York

David Maraniss is an associate editor of The Washington Post who has written biographies of — brace yourself for the contrast — Vince Lombardi and Bill Clinton. He is thus well prepared for the formulation he employs in They Marched Into Sunlight: War and Peace, Vietnam and America, October 1967 (Simon & Schuster, New York, softcover $16). Here, a desperate battle in Vietnam is juxtaposed with antiwar activities occurring more or less simultaneously on the campus of the University of Wisconsin at Madison.

The October 1967 battle involved the 2nd Battalion, 28th Infantry, known as the "Black Lions," part of the 1st Infantry Division. The battalion commander was Lt. Col. Terry Allen Jr., son of the famous Maj. Gen. Terry de la Mesa Allen, who during World War II commanded that same 1st Infantry Division in North Africa.

The Black Lions encountered the 271st Viet Cong Regiment above Lai Khe, north of Saigon, and walked into prepared enemy positions. One U.S. infantry company was in the field with only 65 men, about half the normal fighting complement, while another had 68. It was later estimated that U.S. forces were outnumbered by as much as 8-to-1 in this engagement. In the ensuing fierce fight, Colonel Allen was one of 58 killed, along with Major Don Holleder, the 1st Brigade operations officer, who, in an effort to help the outfit regroup when Allen went down, charged into the midst of the battle and was abruptly cut down himself. For the Americans, writes Maraniss, the battle was "a disaster."

Meanwhile, on the campus at Madison, protesters — supported by many on the faculty — occupied a campus building to block access by fellow students desiring job interviews with Dow Chemical. Campus officials eventually, reluctantly, belatedly ordered the building cleared. Maraniss describes the ensuing riot just like a battle, complete with its own detailed maps. In the confrontation between police and protesters, writes Maraniss, who was there, "the intense hatred of one type for the other now was overwhelming." He understands, as well, the enduring nature of those mortal antipathies, referring at one point to "the overwrought notion of healing."

The parallel between campus and combat doesn't really hold up, but, except in one important respect, that doesn't much matter. The exception is in the implied equivalence of those who refused to serve with those who went to war. The idea that the antiwar protesters are in any way comparable to those who did their duty would be anathema to veterans. Maraniss does acknowledge one major difference: "That was always part of the reality, or unreality, of student life. One could simply leave."

Despite setting up a juxtaposition that is central to the structure of the book, the author seems to perceive the imbalance of the two elements. His treatment of those who served is powerful, dramatic, respectful, significant. By contrast, his effort to portray the antiwar crowd as comparably important seems strained, artificial, lacking in gravitas. This is so, even though his sentiments are apparently with those who opposed the war — perhaps not surprising in that he was himself an undergraduate at Wisconsin during the events he describes.

Even so, Maraniss does quote Joseph Kauffman, dean of student affairs at Wisconsin, on those who used student deferments to avoid military service. The day would come, opined Kauffman, "when these young men will feel guilty that they didn't go and someone went in their place, and they will wonder if they had the courage and the ability to go through something like that."

Maraniss has clearly been pulled two ways, presumably conditioned by his youthful experiences to view military service in one way (he writes of a soldier who has completed his hitch as having "escaped the army"), but also influenced by the veterans he has interacted with during research for this account. "Though I never served in the military and never experienced a battle," he writes, "they allowed me to see the best of soldiering, a bond of love and respect that for all the hyperbole flying around was incomparably meaningful." Had that comment come at the end, it would make a good coda to a most interesting book.


One Response to “They Marched Into Sunlight: War and Peace, Vietnam and America, October 1967 (Book Review)”


  1. 1
    Joe Dirvin says:

    David Maraniss, on a merely surface reading of his book, rationalizes broad and intense feelings weakly and more than likely artificially in order to make his point. Madison and Viet Nam, while serving in the infantry, are mutually exclusive for obvious reasons. As stated in the article, "That was always part of the reality, or unreality, of student life. One could simply leave."

    I served in the infantry in a partner battalion to the Black Lions
    (I served in the 1/26th Infantry), I have always felt, logically so, that the differences between Madison and Viet Nam were and remain profound and incomparable.



Leave a Reply

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Related Articles


History Net Images Spacer
Paid Advertisement
Paid Advertisement
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer
HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Which of these wars resulted in the most surprising underdog upset?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer
STAY CONNECTED WITH US
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer History net Spacer
Paid Advertisement

Paid Advertisement
What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer! | StreamHistory.com
Today in History | Ask Mr. History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | Contact Us

Copyright © 2013 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy