Comments on: The War Over Plunder: Who Owns Art Stolen in War?

By: Perspectives on Art Restitution/Repatriation | the monuments men pathfinder

Perspectives on Art Restitution/Repatriation | the monuments men pathfinder — Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:56:48 +0000

[...] Article: Woodward, Colin. "The War Over Plunder: Who Owns Art Stolen in War?." MHQ: Quarterly Journal Of Military History 22.4 (2010): [...]

By: Module 8: Who owns the past? | ARCH 1010 -Dirty Little Secrets

Module 8: Who owns the past? | ARCH 1010 -Dirty Little Secrets — Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:15:50 +0000

[...] http://www.historynet.com/the-war-over-plunder-who-owns-art-stolen-in-war.htm [...]

By: Beatrice hartz

Beatrice hartz — Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:43:04 +0000

The germans in the second world war stole 450 oleo paintings made by louis hartz from the house of my uncle sem hartz . We never got them back again.louis hartz was my. Grandfather and a well known dutch painter. If someone knows about those paintings i would love to know about them.

By: Connections | Imagining India

Connections | Imagining India — Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:29:20 +0000

[...] I took last quarter. The photo accompanied a block of text teasing an extensive article titled "The War Over Plunder." The big connection: the late Queen Mother's crown contains the Koh-i-Noor Diamond which the [...]

By: Kaze: A Work of Art or a Human Life? Choose.

Kaze: A Work of Art or a Human Life? Choose. — Fri, 28 Jan 2011 04:44:26 +0000

[...] an interesting article on “The War Over Plunder: Who Owns Art Stolen in War?” appears in the current HistoryNet. [...]

By: STEAL, CONCEAL, & NO DEAL : Blood Canvas | Madame Pickwick Art Blog

STEAL, CONCEAL, & NO DEAL : Blood Canvas | Madame Pickwick Art Blog — Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:53:27 +0000

[...] past conflicts, captured art tended to flow in one direction: from vanquished to conquerors. After Napoleon's defeat, France had been forced to [...]

By: Kaze: A Work of Art or a Human Life? Choose. | 3:17am

Kaze: A Work of Art or a Human Life? Choose. | 3:17am — Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:52:05 +0000

[...] an interesting article on “The War Over Plunder: Who Owns Art Stolen in War?” appears in the current HistoryNet. [...]

By: Steve Tucker

Steve Tucker — Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:32:36 +0000

An interesting article. But a reasonable alternative could be that these artifacts are not cultural to a specific government, ethnicity, or geographic area but contribute to the human race's cultural identity. If so, an argument could be made that these artifacts should be held in places such as New York, London, Paris, or Tokyo (the victors of these wars) because more people would have access to them. It is not really a bad thing to have these artworks in more accessible locations. As travel becomes easier and cheaper it may make sense to return them to the geographic area, but in the end does it really matter now?

By: Thieves, plunderers, and musicians « Law and Conversation

Thieves, plunderers, and musicians « Law and Conversation — Fri, 27 Aug 2010 05:09:03 +0000

[...] repatriation of property stolen decades or centuries ago, as Colin Woodard shows in his article, "The War Over Plunder: Who Owns Art Stolen in War?" from The Quarterly Journal of Military History. Many treasures are simply of unknown [...]

By: When can a country legally keep art captured in war? « Belligerati

When can a country legally keep art captured in war? « Belligerati — Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:17:21 +0000

[...] discussion of this and many other issues in the international law of looted art are discussed in The War Over Plunder: Who Owns Art Stolen in War? Posted Tuesday, August 17th, 2010 (3 seconds ago) under Arts, Literature, Sports and Leisure, [...]