<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The War Over Plunder: Who Owns Art Stolen in War?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/the-war-over-plunder-who-owns-art-stolen-in-war.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-war-over-plunder-who-owns-art-stolen-in-war.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-war-over-plunder-who-owns-art-stolen-in-war</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:15:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connections &#124; Imagining India</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-war-over-plunder-who-owns-art-stolen-in-war.htm#comment-657322</link>
		<dc:creator>Connections &#124; Imagining India</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682270#comment-657322</guid>
		<description>[...] I took last quarter. The photo accompanied a block of text teasing an extensive article titled &#8220;The War Over Plunder.&#8221; The big connection: the late Queen Mother&#8217;s crown contains the Koh-i-Noor Diamond which the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I took last quarter. The photo accompanied a block of text teasing an extensive article titled &#034;The War Over Plunder.&#034; The big connection: the late Queen Mother&#039;s crown contains the Koh-i-Noor Diamond which the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaze: A Work of Art or a Human Life? Choose.</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-war-over-plunder-who-owns-art-stolen-in-war.htm#comment-444648</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaze: A Work of Art or a Human Life? Choose.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 04:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682270#comment-444648</guid>
		<description>[...] an interesting article on “The War Over Plunder: Who Owns Art Stolen in War?” appears in the current HistoryNet.&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an interesting article on “The War Over Plunder: Who Owns Art Stolen in War?” appears in the current HistoryNet.&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STEAL, CONCEAL, &#38; NO DEAL : Blood Canvas &#124; Madame Pickwick Art Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-war-over-plunder-who-owns-art-stolen-in-war.htm#comment-428075</link>
		<dc:creator>STEAL, CONCEAL, &#38; NO DEAL : Blood Canvas &#124; Madame Pickwick Art Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682270#comment-428075</guid>
		<description>[...] past conflicts, captured art tended to flow in one direction: from vanquished to conquerors. After Napoleon&#8217;s defeat, France had been forced to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] past conflicts, captured art tended to flow in one direction: from vanquished to conquerors. After Napoleon&#039;s defeat, France had been forced to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaze: A Work of Art or a Human Life? Choose. &#124; 3:17am</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-war-over-plunder-who-owns-art-stolen-in-war.htm#comment-398125</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaze: A Work of Art or a Human Life? Choose. &#124; 3:17am</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682270#comment-398125</guid>
		<description>[...] an interesting article on “The War Over Plunder: Who Owns Art Stolen in War?” appears in the current HistoryNet.&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an interesting article on “The War Over Plunder: Who Owns Art Stolen in War?” appears in the current HistoryNet.&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Tucker</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-war-over-plunder-who-owns-art-stolen-in-war.htm#comment-327419</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682270#comment-327419</guid>
		<description>An interesting article.  But a reasonable alternative could be that these artifacts are not cultural to a specific government, ethnicity, or geographic area but contribute to the human race&#039;s cultural identity.  If so, an argument could be made that these artifacts should be held in places such as New York, London, Paris, or Tokyo (the victors of these wars) because more people would have access to them.  It is not really a bad thing to have these artworks in more accessible locations.  As travel becomes easier and cheaper it may make sense to return them to the geographic area, but in the end does it really matter now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting article.  But a reasonable alternative could be that these artifacts are not cultural to a specific government, ethnicity, or geographic area but contribute to the human race&#039;s cultural identity.  If so, an argument could be made that these artifacts should be held in places such as New York, London, Paris, or Tokyo (the victors of these wars) because more people would have access to them.  It is not really a bad thing to have these artworks in more accessible locations.  As travel becomes easier and cheaper it may make sense to return them to the geographic area, but in the end does it really matter now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thieves, plunderers, and musicians &#171; Law and Conversation</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-war-over-plunder-who-owns-art-stolen-in-war.htm#comment-324806</link>
		<dc:creator>Thieves, plunderers, and musicians &#171; Law and Conversation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 05:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682270#comment-324806</guid>
		<description>[...] repatriation of property stolen decades or centuries ago, as Colin Woodard shows in his article, &#8220;The War Over Plunder: Who Owns Art Stolen in War?&#8221; from The Quarterly Journal of Military History.  Many treasures are simply of unknown [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] repatriation of property stolen decades or centuries ago, as Colin Woodard shows in his article, &#034;The War Over Plunder: Who Owns Art Stolen in War?&#034; from The Quarterly Journal of Military History.  Many treasures are simply of unknown [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When can a country legally keep art captured in war? &#171; Belligerati</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-war-over-plunder-who-owns-art-stolen-in-war.htm#comment-319790</link>
		<dc:creator>When can a country legally keep art captured in war? &#171; Belligerati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682270#comment-319790</guid>
		<description>[...] discussion of this and many other issues in the international law of looted art are discussed in The War Over Plunder: Who Owns Art Stolen in War?  Posted Tuesday, August 17th, 2010 (3 seconds ago) under Arts, Literature, Sports and Leisure, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussion of this and many other issues in the international law of looted art are discussed in The War Over Plunder: Who Owns Art Stolen in War?  Posted Tuesday, August 17th, 2010 (3 seconds ago) under Arts, Literature, Sports and Leisure, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The War Over Plunder &#171; Printede perler</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-war-over-plunder-who-owns-art-stolen-in-war.htm#comment-319737</link>
		<dc:creator>The War Over Plunder &#171; Printede perler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682270#comment-319737</guid>
		<description>[...] stjålet for lenge siden. Hvem den rettmessige eier virkelig er avhenger av øynene som ser, sier denne gode artikkelen på Historynet. Artikkelen begynner med svenskenes herjinger i Praha i 1648, og tsjkkernes krav om tilbakelevering [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stjålet for lenge siden. Hvem den rettmessige eier virkelig er avhenger av øynene som ser, sier denne gode artikkelen på Historynet. Artikkelen begynner med svenskenes herjinger i Praha i 1648, og tsjkkernes krav om tilbakelevering [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-war-over-plunder-who-owns-art-stolen-in-war.htm#comment-319413</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682270#comment-319413</guid>
		<description>Left out in the article is the Vatican, I suspect being the greatest respoitory of stolen art throughout history.  Then there are the Swiss vaults and the British Museum.  Secretary Rumsfeld&#039;s inaction and comments are an insult to any man of honor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Left out in the article is the Vatican, I suspect being the greatest respoitory of stolen art throughout history.  Then there are the Swiss vaults and the British Museum.  Secretary Rumsfeld&#039;s inaction and comments are an insult to any man of honor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I ran across a great, but short... - World War II Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-war-over-plunder-who-owns-art-stolen-in-war.htm#comment-319388</link>
		<dc:creator>I ran across a great, but short... - World War II Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13682270#comment-319388</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

