<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Pearl Harbor Myth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/the-pearl-harbor-myth.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-pearl-harbor-myth.htm</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:44:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seconds from Disaster video about the Pearl Harbor Attack</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-pearl-harbor-myth.htm#comment-807314</link>
		<dc:creator>Seconds from Disaster video about the Pearl Harbor Attack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13684214#comment-807314</guid>
		<description>[...] to some of the same conclusions, that Alan D. Zimm does in his article, The Pearl Harbor Myth (The Pearl Harbor Myth). I found the Zimm article in OpanaPointer&#039;s post: Pearl Harbor attack one big SNAFU  Minohara [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to some of the same conclusions, that Alan D. Zimm does in his article, The Pearl Harbor Myth (The Pearl Harbor Myth). I found the Zimm article in OpanaPointer&#039;s post: Pearl Harbor attack one big SNAFU  Minohara [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting article I just ran across...</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-pearl-harbor-myth.htm#comment-786495</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting article I just ran across...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13684214#comment-786495</guid>
		<description>[...] be, but it does make one remember that the; &quot;plans dissolve upon first contact&quot;.  Goto:  The Pearl Harbor Myth       Happy Trails, Clint.        Reply With [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be, but it does make one remember that the; &quot;plans dissolve upon first contact&quot;.  Goto:  The Pearl Harbor Myth       Happy Trails, Clint.        Reply With [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-pearl-harbor-myth.htm#comment-779028</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13684214#comment-779028</guid>
		<description>I believe little to no damage was done to the submarine base either. This is a report from Submarine Squadron 4 at the time. Note their losses and damage.

FF12-10(4)/A16-3
Serial 0556     

From: The Commander Submarine Squadron FOUR.  
To: The Commander Submarines, Scouting Force.  
   
Subject: Attack on Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941 -- Measures taken.  
   
Reference: (a) Cincpac despatch 102102.  


In accordance with reference the following report relating to the attack on Pearl Harbor is submitted. 
Offensive measure taken: 
Ships of Squadron Four, and Squadron Six, berthed at the Submarine Base, maintained a continuous antiaircraft fire. 

Personnel of the Submarine Base manned 250 rifles, 15 automatic rifles and 15 machine guns, maintaining a continuous fire. 

Damage to enemy: 
Two low flying torpedo planes were shot down. One crashed in the channel about fifty yards off Pier Four. The other crashed in the channel fifty yards off berth twelve. 

Own losses and damage: None.

Distinguished conduct of personnel: 
All personnel without exception were alert and eager, carrying on in an exemplary manner. 

Other items of interest: 

Rescue parties were sent to disabled ships, and Kuahua Island where survivors were landing. Fire apparatus was sent to the fires in the Navy Yard.

All facilities of the Submarine Base were made available to the survivors. Wounded men were treated at the Dispensary. Officers and men were fed, clothed, berthed and made comfortable. Office space was provided for Commander Battle Force and Commander Mine Force.

The Widgeon, Seagull and all salvage facilities and divers were sent to work on disabled ships.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe little to no damage was done to the submarine base either. This is a report from Submarine Squadron 4 at the time. Note their losses and damage.</p>
<p>FF12-10(4)/A16-3<br />
Serial 0556     </p>
<p>From: The Commander Submarine Squadron FOUR.<br />
To: The Commander Submarines, Scouting Force.  </p>
<p>Subject: Attack on Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941 &#8212; Measures taken.  </p>
<p>Reference: (a) Cincpac despatch 102102.  </p>
<p>In accordance with reference the following report relating to the attack on Pearl Harbor is submitted.<br />
Offensive measure taken:<br />
Ships of Squadron Four, and Squadron Six, berthed at the Submarine Base, maintained a continuous antiaircraft fire. </p>
<p>Personnel of the Submarine Base manned 250 rifles, 15 automatic rifles and 15 machine guns, maintaining a continuous fire. </p>
<p>Damage to enemy:<br />
Two low flying torpedo planes were shot down. One crashed in the channel about fifty yards off Pier Four. The other crashed in the channel fifty yards off berth twelve. </p>
<p>Own losses and damage: None.</p>
<p>Distinguished conduct of personnel:<br />
All personnel without exception were alert and eager, carrying on in an exemplary manner. </p>
<p>Other items of interest: </p>
<p>Rescue parties were sent to disabled ships, and Kuahua Island where survivors were landing. Fire apparatus was sent to the fires in the Navy Yard.</p>
<p>All facilities of the Submarine Base were made available to the survivors. Wounded men were treated at the Dispensary. Officers and men were fed, clothed, berthed and made comfortable. Office space was provided for Commander Battle Force and Commander Mine Force.</p>
<p>The Widgeon, Seagull and all salvage facilities and divers were sent to work on disabled ships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pearl Harbor attack one big SNAFU?</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-pearl-harbor-myth.htm#comment-779008</link>
		<dc:creator>Pearl Harbor attack one big SNAFU?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 23:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13684214#comment-779008</guid>
		<description>[...] Harbor attack one big SNAFU?           The Pearl Harbor Myth  Recommended. Not approved, but recommended.           &quot;One of our King Tigers could take five [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Harbor attack one big SNAFU?           The Pearl Harbor Myth  Recommended. Not approved, but recommended.           &quot;One of our King Tigers could take five [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: World War II November/December Table of Contents &#124; Freedom Developers</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-pearl-harbor-myth.htm#comment-778993</link>
		<dc:creator>World War II November/December Table of Contents &#124; Freedom Developers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 16:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13684214#comment-778993</guid>
		<description>[...] Harbor at 70 The Pearl Harbor Myth A new analysis shows the &quot;brilliant&quot; Japanese attack was riddled with blunders By Alan D. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Harbor at 70 The Pearl Harbor Myth A new analysis shows the &quot;brilliant&quot; Japanese attack was riddled with blunders By Alan D. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
