<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Music of War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/the-music-of-war.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-music-of-war.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-music-of-war</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:41:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musik dan Perang &#171; Saung Kata</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-music-of-war.htm#comment-362590</link>
		<dc:creator>Musik dan Perang &#171; Saung Kata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 04:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-362590</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.historynet.com/the-music-of-war.htm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.historynet.com/the-music-of-war.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.historynet.com/the-music-of-war.htm</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Music and Culture Essay</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-music-of-war.htm#comment-237792</link>
		<dc:creator>Music and Culture Essay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-237792</guid>
		<description>[...] automations, to obey, smoothly and in formation, whatever commands were given by their superiors”(http://www.historynet.com/the-music-of-war.htm [8th paragraph]). Oral commands during combat were no longer easy to understand or hear with the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] automations, to obey, smoothly and in formation, whatever commands were given by their superiors”(http://www.historynet.com/the-music-of-war.htm [8th paragraph]). Oral commands during combat were no longer easy to understand or hear with the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-music-of-war.htm#comment-47193</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47193</guid>
		<description>&quot;Britain outlawed the instruments after the defeat of Prince Charles Edward Stuart’s Scottish army in 1746 - only to lift the ban for the benefit of its own Scottish regiments soon thereafter &quot;

1. It was a Jocobite army not Scottish containing Highlanders, Lowlanders  Irish and French.  There was even an English Regiment (Manchester) which stayed to occupy Carlisle so wasn&#039;t at the battle. The Government forces were equally diverse containing Lowland Highland and Hanovarian untis in addition to the English.

2. The instrument was never outlawed after the defeat this is a myth. It was called an instrument of war by the judge in the only piper to be executed for rebellion&#039;s trail but so were trumpets and drums and he was convicted of treason not playing the pipes. The Proscription act of 1747 never mentions pipes in any way shape of form and you have to misquote the judge and call it a weapon not an instrument to get it to fit the act. In addition there are no records of anyone being prosecuted for playing owning or teaching the pipes. There is also plenty of evidence of famous civilian pipers, pipe makers and piping schools in existence in the immediate aftermath of Culloden and for decades afterwards. The act of Proscription which actually banned arms and weapons and the wearing of tartan (except for the Army and Landed Gentry) was repealed only in 1782. The first new Highland regiment after Culloden was raised in 1757 some 25 years before the repeal of the act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;Britain outlawed the instruments after the defeat of Prince Charles Edward Stuart’s Scottish army in 1746 &#8211; only to lift the ban for the benefit of its own Scottish regiments soon thereafter &#034;</p>
<p>1. It was a Jocobite army not Scottish containing Highlanders, Lowlanders  Irish and French.  There was even an English Regiment (Manchester) which stayed to occupy Carlisle so wasn&#039;t at the battle. The Government forces were equally diverse containing Lowland Highland and Hanovarian untis in addition to the English.</p>
<p>2. The instrument was never outlawed after the defeat this is a myth. It was called an instrument of war by the judge in the only piper to be executed for rebellion&#039;s trail but so were trumpets and drums and he was convicted of treason not playing the pipes. The Proscription act of 1747 never mentions pipes in any way shape of form and you have to misquote the judge and call it a weapon not an instrument to get it to fit the act. In addition there are no records of anyone being prosecuted for playing owning or teaching the pipes. There is also plenty of evidence of famous civilian pipers, pipe makers and piping schools in existence in the immediate aftermath of Culloden and for decades afterwards. The act of Proscription which actually banned arms and weapons and the wearing of tartan (except for the Army and Landed Gentry) was repealed only in 1782. The first new Highland regiment after Culloden was raised in 1757 some 25 years before the repeal of the act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/the-music-of-war.htm#comment-20876</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20876</guid>
		<description>this info needs more information about medieval music in war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this info needs more information about medieval music in war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

